• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Advantages of a 5.0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brtnstrns
  • Start date Start date Jan 14, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

brtnstrns

Member
Dec 19, 2003
606
11
19
Lewisville, TX
Jan 14, 2004
#1
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #1
What exactly are the advantages of getting a 5.0L? People always talk about them so whats the deal? Why should I get one of those over lets say a 302? Like do they come with power steering since they're newer? And if they're worth it, will it fit in my car? (1966 200 ci)
 
M

mp67

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
392
0
0
Texas
Jan 14, 2004
#2
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #2
brtnstrns said:
What exactly are the advantages of getting a 5.0L? People always talk about them so whats the deal? Why should I get one of those over lets say a 302? Like do they come with power steering since they're newer? And if they're worth it, will it fit in my car? (1966 200 ci)
Click to expand...

A 5.0 is a 502. 5 liters is 302 cubic inches. 5.0 is referred to as the 302 offered since early 80's but is still a 302. A newer 5.0 is a roller motor. Roller cam motor that is. You can easily convert and older 302 to a roller. They also have fuel injection and serpentine belts. If your looking to put one in your 66, you need deep pockets. You not only need the motor and fuel injection, but the computer as well. Yes a 302 will fit in your car.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 14, 2004
#3
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #3
The only 5.0 motor that has a real advantage over an older 302 are the roller cam motors. A roller allows a cam profile that out performs a flat-tappet design of the same lift/duration. The roller lifters also reduce friction. The late model E7TE heads also breathe a little better than the older heads. The crankshafts in post 82 motors also weigh less than their older counterparts ( less rotating mass = more power) Other than these differences, there's not much different between the older and newer motors aside from EFI
 

burnout289

Founding Member
Jan 3, 2002
1,000
0
36
sun diego
Jan 14, 2004
#4
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #4
5.0's are metric, which as we all know is superior to a 302 since the metric system is better than the american standard.... that being said, modifying an inline-6 to a V8 at all is a lot of work, from what i've read on this forum. the 5.0/302 motor is almost idendical to a 289 on the outside, so can drop right into a 289-based car. the 302 is a great motor for stroking, as well.

depending on who you ask and how much $$$ you have, some people would tell you to start with a V8 car for mods rather than trying to convert an I-6. i have no experience with that, however. i've seen some pretty wicked I-6's on here, though.
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Jan 14, 2004
#5
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #5
burnout289 said:
5.0's are metric, which as we all know is superior to a 302 since the metric system is better than the american standard....
Click to expand...


That's a joke, right.

302 Cubic inches equals 4.94889 Liters

They are technically EQUAL

Just different ways of measuring the same thing
 

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Jan 14, 2004
#6
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #6
I am doing the 5.0 swap using a hopped up 91 GT motor and AOD into a '68. (hopped up motor meaning GT-40Y heads, e-303 cam, 65mm Throttle body, GT-40 intake, and some other minor mods. ) The car origianlly had a 302 and C4, just pulled it- want to buy it? (sorry cheap plug ) The total swap will cost me about $2400. (not including the new engine parts) It has got to cost about twice that amount to beef up the suspension on the 6cyl and what ever else you have to do. Just wanted to give a cost idea.
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Jan 14, 2004
#7
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #7
Besides, everybody knows the cool mustangs have 5.7 liter mototrs
 
J

JimF65

New Member
Jan 5, 2004
41
0
0
Jan 14, 2004
#8
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #8
burnout289 said:
modifying an inline-6 to a V8 at all is a lot of work, from what i've read on this forum. the 5.0/302 motor is almost idendical to a 289 on the outside, so can drop right into a 289-based car. the 302 is a great motor for stroking, as well.

depending on who you ask and how much $$$ you have, some people would tell you to start with a V8 car for mods rather than trying to convert an I-6. i have no experience with that, however. i've seen some pretty wicked I-6's on here, though.
Click to expand...

I converted my I-6 65 convert to 5.0. Yes, it was/is a lot of work (almost finished), but a major upgrade in the car's performance. The 5.0 is the same block as the 289, so everything fits - the T-5 transmission shifter even comes up through the floor in the same place!!! (Use 66 motor mounts) The computer and wiring can be a bit pricy (the conversion engine wiring harness alone was almost $500 from Ford), but I bought the engine, trans, computer and original harness in a package from one donor car and that helped. Be sure to get all the sensors with the engine, especially the barometric pressure sensor.

Replacing the entire suspension front and rear takes a bit, but is necessary if you're starting with a 6 (I upgraded plus dropped it one inch all around) if you're gonna handle the extra power. Stronger rearend and 4-wheel power disc brakes are worth the effort. Price? I have less than $1000 in the suspension changeover. Not counting the Torque Thrust Ds and Michelins, of course :o) they were a bit more than that! You can triple that if you go to rack & pinion Mustang II front (kits are available to change over) but that would only be necessary for a serious competition road car.

It is a lot of work but worth it, I think. Just depends on what you want in a car. Mustangs Plus in California has a lot of the pieces you need and some good instructions on particulars.
 
J

JimF65

New Member
Jan 5, 2004
41
0
0
Jan 14, 2004
#9
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #9
gp001 said:
Besides, everybody knows the cool mustangs have 5.7 liter mototrs
Click to expand...

Hmmmm.... actually, everyone knows cool Mustangs have 260, 289, 170, 200, 302, 5.0, 5.7, 4.6, 427, and quite a few other displacement motors!!!
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Jan 14, 2004
#10
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #10
JimF65 said:
Hmmmm.... actually, everyone knows cool Mustangs have 260, 289, 170, 200, 302, 5.0, 5.7, 4.6, 427, and quite a few other displacement motors!!!
Click to expand...

What, no sense of humor?
 
J

JimF65

New Member
Jan 5, 2004
41
0
0
Jan 14, 2004
#11
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #11
gp001 said:
What, no sense of humor?
Click to expand...

Oops, sorry, I left out this at the end (really meant to) >chuckle<
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 14, 2004
#12
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #12
burnout289 said:
5.0's are metric, which as we all know is superior to a 302 since the metric system is better than the american standard....
Click to expand...
,,,,,, Please tell me you were only kidding?? There's nothing metric about the 5.0 other than the liter designation. All the bolts in them have SAE standard threads.
 

burnout289

Founding Member
Jan 3, 2002
1,000
0
36
sun diego
Jan 15, 2004
#13
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #13
as;ldjgal;sgjasdl;

yes, i was joking! you people are funny.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jan 15, 2004
#14
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #14
actually gp was referring to his stroker jim, since ford made a 5.8L motor, not a 5.7
 
M

my66coupe

Founding Member
Apr 30, 2002
1,134
0
36
Arizona fountain hills
Jan 15, 2004
#15
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #15
I was recently quoted 750 plus tax for a EFI conversion, including everything brand new or refurbished, upper and lower intake, complete wiring harness, etc... But the manifolds are stock specs and same with everything else. Good starting point I think. Anyone get a good junkyard price??

Mike

Ps my 5.7 is better than all of yours
 
M

my66coupe

Founding Member
Apr 30, 2002
1,134
0
36
Arizona fountain hills
Jan 15, 2004
#16
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #16
And to answer your original questions brtnstrns the EFI 5.0 is more reliable and I beleive you can plug alot more power with the roller motors. The engine probably will have power steering, but Im not sure if you can use the same system on a classic. And yes they will fit in your car, its exactly the same size of your 302/289 only with fuel injection.

Mike
 

jcp123

New Member
Nov 1, 2003
408
0
0
Tyler, TX
Jan 15, 2004
#17
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #17
just having that roller cam setup is a nice advantage. roller cams are fantastic, i've considered converting to rollers myself because it might just be worth it
 
3

351pacecar

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2001
644
0
0
Hudson, Wisconsin
Jan 16, 2004
#18
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #18
The 5.0 HO's (the ones with the roller cams) are well built for all the previously stated reasons, but nobody mentioned the fact that they had forged pistons, most engines have cast pistons. (or those icky hypereutectic ones but we wont go there)
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
Jan 16, 2004
#19
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #19
my66coupe said:
Ps my 5.7 is better than all of yours
Click to expand...

Oh yea?
 

65fsbkhipo

Founding Member
Jul 6, 2001
1,296
0
0
Tampa, FL
Jan 16, 2004
#20
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #20
JimF65 said:
I converted my I-6 65 convert to 5.0. Yes, it was/is a lot of work (almost finished), but a major upgrade in the car's performance. The 5.0 is the same block as the 289, so everything fits - the T-5 transmission shifter even comes up through the floor in the same place!!! (Use 66 motor mounts) The computer and wiring can be a bit pricy (the conversion engine wiring harness alone was almost $500 from Ford), but I bought the engine, trans, computer and original harness in a package from one donor car and that helped. Be sure to get all the sensors with the engine, especially the barometric pressure sensor.

It is a lot of work but worth it, I think. Just depends on what you want in a car. Mustangs Plus in California has a lot of the pieces you need and some good instructions on particulars.
Click to expand...

Do you have a wiring diagram for the installation...I could use one.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
1965 Mustang with 80s 5.0 engine in it Power Steering hose or connection ID?
  • spearce
  • May 19, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
110
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 8, 2026
AeroCoupe
J
Exhaust manifold to Y-pipe nut & stud dimensions?
  • joeybuddy96
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
74
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 9, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
323
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
M
Too much for me to repair in my current housing situation
  • My Drama Magnet 04 Gt
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
8
Views
297
The Welcome Wagon Apr 14, 2026
Noobz347
  • Sticky
Free Beta Access: Tool I Built to Hunt Fox Bodies Faster
  • MRaburn
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
504
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 7, 2026
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?