• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

AFR 185's on a 306?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tylerrocks
  • Start date Start date Jan 18, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Jan 18, 2007
#1
  • Jan 18, 2007
  • #1
Well finally got an afterschool job to help feed my adiction. Next couple of projects include Megasquirt fuel injection for my 65' (thanks Bottlefed!!) and new heads to replace my GT-40p's. In another year, I could see myself moving up to a 347. I would like to know what yall thank about going ahead and getting the AFR 185's. I know these are a lil lage for the 306 but are they too big? Other vitals include Edelbrock RMP intake (carb style), F303 cam (226/226--544/544), T-5, and 3.89 rear. As always, any HP guestimates?

Tyler
 

Shakin66

Founding Member
Jan 19, 2001
628
1
19
Waycross, Ga / Lake James, NC
Jan 18, 2007
#2
  • Jan 18, 2007
  • #2
I say go for it if your long term goal is to have a stroker. I am in the same boat myself thinking the 210cc intake runners on the alum. heads I am looking at may be too large but when you have a power adder you kinda need the larger intake tracts.
 
M

mtbdoc

New Member
Nov 2, 2003
245
1
0
Jan 18, 2007
#3
  • Jan 18, 2007
  • #3
Actually when you are adding boost, you don't need large ports. The forced induction flows plenty as you are above atmospheric pressure [duh!]. Smaller ports will have better velocity, especially when you first open it up and aren't in boost. 185's aren't too much for a 306, but if you are going to that expense, I'd go a bit bigger on the cam. Let that baby rev!!! And these cars are relatively light, so they'll take more cam and still have decent low end power [compared to a heavy, late model car].
 

Shakin66

Founding Member
Jan 19, 2001
628
1
19
Waycross, Ga / Lake James, NC
Jan 19, 2007
#4
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #4
Well I guess I should have just asked you instead of researching what heads were going to be best for my combo. I did the (DUH) stupid thing by calling my engine builder, AFR, and Trick flow to name a few and asking them. I know boost as all 3 of my personal vehicals are boosted in some form. Jeez......
 
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Jan 19, 2007
#5
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #5
Shakin66 said:
I say go for it if your long term goal is to have a stroker. I am in the same boat myself thinking the 210cc intake runners on the alum. heads I am looking at may be too large but when you have a power adder you kinda need the larger intake tracts.
Click to expand...

Yea if I had a blower it would be Vic Jrs. all the way Just weary of those ports on a NA 306.

Actually when you are adding boost, you don't need large ports. The forced induction flows plenty as you are above atmospheric pressure [duh!]. Smaller ports will have better velocity, especially when you first open it up and aren't in boost. 185's aren't too much for a 306, but if you are going to that expense, I'd go a bit bigger on the cam. Let that baby rev!!! And these cars are relatively light, so they'll take more cam and still have decent low end power [compared to a heavy, late model car].
Click to expand...

Thats what I'm saying. If AFR's flow 277cfm/185cc and the Vics flow 288cfm/210cc the AFR's gotta have some better velocity. Am I thinking right? It makes sence. (info from AFR site and FordMuscle.com) I guess I kinda answered my original Q? there, AFR's are the better choice. You got me to thinking about my cam. I found one that Lutani makes that caught my eye. I forget the exact specs but it was someting along the lines of 232/242 @.05 and 540/560 lift with a 2800-6500 powerband.

BTW this is an on-again-off-again DD which I may or may not be taking off to school (out of town) next August
 
M

mtbdoc

New Member
Nov 2, 2003
245
1
0
Jan 19, 2007
#6
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #6
S-66: Fine...ignore such issues as port velocity. Given the limitation of flow rate the Powerdyn's tend to show, maybe you need less restriction. But for most applications, oversized ports are not needed for many FI apps. With the twin turbo setup I'm currently installing on my LS2-GTO, the stock heads are great for 550-600 rwhp. MUCH bigger ports are needed for a 500 rwhp NA car. AFR often has better port velocity AND will out-perform larger heads in real-world situations [ie at the strip]. Anyway, sorry if you didn't want any input.

Now back to the starter of this thread.

Tyler: a couple of suggestion...first, clearly think through your desired end-point. Give Comp Cams a call and see what their tech folks suggest. But by all means give Ed Curtis a call @ FTI. [ http://flowtechinduction.com/ ] Ed is a serious cam guru, and you will likely pay <$100 more for a custom cam from him. He can give you great advice about an integrated package as well [heads and cam]. He was a Mustang guy for a long time, but is now also in the LSx arena since he bought a GTO.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Jan 19, 2007
#7
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #7
good luck getting Ed C. on the phone, lol. Add Camshaft Innovations on your list of cam providers, Jay Allen is a stand up guy. He can set you up with a great set of heads too.
 
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Jan 19, 2007
#8
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #8
Ok guys I'll remember those names when I get ready for a cam. Thanks for all the input
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 19, 2007
#9
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #9
If you've still got stock rods and bolts in there, the 185's are going to push the power band into territory that's going to break something for sure. With my Canfields (same as ARF165's) and a Vic jr with a Holley 650 the upper rpm limit was 7500. Stock rods are fine with that, but only with good bolts.
 
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Jan 19, 2007
#10
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #10
already got some ARP rod bolts in there, think I'll be alright?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 19, 2007
#11
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #11
What lifters you using in there? THAT is another factor. If you're running stock O.E Ford lifters, your rev limit is determined by them. Anything over 6000 or so, they bounce off the cam the results are the same as valve float.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Jan 19, 2007
#12
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #12
my buddies dad has the 165's on a 10.5:1 289,256* .550 lift cam,Vic Jr/650 cfm and made 446 on the dyno.stock bottom end with Arp bolts.
 
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Jan 19, 2007
#13
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #13
^^^Wow, thats impressive. Is that 256* at .05? Is that streetable?

D. I am using OE hydrolic roller lifters. Are there any other options besides solid lifters?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 19, 2007
#14
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #14
tylerrocks said:
^^^Wow, thats impressive. Is that 256* at .05? Is that streetable?

D. I am using OE hydrolic roller lifters. Are there any other options besides solid lifters?
Click to expand...

Yea, Crane sells O.E. type hydraulic rollers that will rev higher. These are what I switched to, p/n 36530-16 Summits sells em for about $170 a set. I've rev'd em to 7500 in a 306, B cam w/1.7 rockers. My Kid was home over the X-mas holiday and I learned that he was reving my 331 to 7 grand. Same set of lifters in it, but with a Z303 cam.
 
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Jan 19, 2007
#15
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #15
Isn't that what sons are good for, playing with your toys? Anyways thanks for the info and suggestion.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 19, 2007
#16
  • Jan 19, 2007
  • #16
Yea, and he managed to suck in the intake gaskets when downshifting in too low a gear with too many rpms. But just as well I guess, I tore into the 331 last weekend to also find that the timing gear on the cam was wearing into the cam retainer plate. This has been the second time for this. I've finally realized I have the Ford Racing timing set that requires a steel cam retainer plate. I bought this set a few years back when just getting back into this stuff. The parts guy at the dealer I bought it from never told me I needed the steel plate to go with the gear.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jan 20, 2007
#17
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #17
You basically described my old combo. 9.2-1 308 with 185's. Not too big at all. Ran the X cam and switched to the F cam right before turbo. Ran the same time, didn't lose anything anywhere. Had enough umph down low to pull the wheels with an auto. And I only shifted at 6400.
 
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Jan 20, 2007
#18
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #18
That sucks D, just part of the game tho i guess.

10sec, have any Times/MPH with your old combo?
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Jan 20, 2007
#19
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #19
Best in the 1/8 was 7.67@89.15 and the 1/4 was 12.14@109.9.
With a little squezze it went 7.14@94.55. Never made a 1/4 pass with the bottle.Car drove and cruised fine. Perfectly reliable.I'm cheap, too. Stock used lifters out of a junk motor, stock retainers and spider plate with a stud girdle.
Depending on how crazy you may or may not get with the cam, I needed a 750. I tried a 650 and lost MPH and a little down low also.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Jan 20, 2007
#20
  • Jan 20, 2007
  • #20
tylerrocks said:
^^^Wow, thats impressive. Is that 256* at .05? Is that streetable?

D. I am using OE hydrolic roller lifters. Are there any other options besides solid lifters?
Click to expand...
it was very streetable, idles at about 900, and made for a vey nice little 289.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
AFR 185's on a 306
  • tylerrocks
  • Jan 18, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 18, 2007
Brn N Rubr
B
B
AFR 185's and valve clearance.
  • blacksunshine89
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 17, 2006
Michael Yount
9
Trick flow twisted wedge or afr 185's on...
  • 93lx50conv
  • Mar 14, 2004
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 24, 2006
bluevenom867
306, 331, 347 Crate motor ...??
  • mstangfrk95GTS!
  • Jun 19, 2004
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 25, 2004
mstangfrk95GTS!
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?