• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

afr185

  • Thread starter Thread starter shelbe67
  • Start date Start date Mar 6, 2006

shelbe67

Member
Apr 10, 2004
309
0
17
Mar 6, 2006
#1
  • Mar 6, 2006
  • #1
I was just wandering who has the afr185 on a stock bottom end? how big of a cam have you guys used? who has p-v clearance issues? thanks
 
J

jared_blown5.0

New Member
Dec 27, 2005
73
0
0
Mar 10, 2006
#2
  • Mar 10, 2006
  • #2
Well first off you do know that you have to fly cut your pistons for the valves to clear on the stock bottom end even if you use the stock 5.0 cam. But to answer your question i have a stock bottom end, afr 185cc heads and comp cams 35-518-8 cam. Teh cam has .555 and .565 lift at .050. My piston to valve clearence with this cam and the fly cut pistons and a 39k head gasket was ZERO. LOL So i got SCE head gasket that was 62k thick, and now my valve cleaence on the intake is 21k. So my advice is to go no bigger than the cam i chose or else it gonna be a headache. If you want to know where to get a tool you can rent to flycut ur pistons, or the head gasket part number or if you have any other questions feel free to email me at jlsx125@yahoo.com! It was a headache to get it all squared away.
 

69clark

Founding Member
Sep 25, 2002
731
7
18
Ravena, NY
Mar 10, 2006
#3
  • Mar 10, 2006
  • #3
Don't you need to rebalance your rotating assembly when you fly cut your pistons like that?
 

Methodical

15 Year Member
Dec 1, 2003
1,192
11
59
Clinton, MD
Mar 10, 2006
#4
  • Mar 10, 2006
  • #4
Go with the AFR 165s. Peace
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Mar 10, 2006
#5
  • Mar 10, 2006
  • #5
69clark said:
Don't you need to rebalance your rotating assembly when you fly cut your pistons like that?
Click to expand...
MM&FF would tell you yes, but I say they're full of ****. You're taking the rotating assembly a few grams out of balance. Compared to the 50oz. balance, what's a few grams? Unless you're going to zing the stock bottom end to 7200 or so, there isn't anything to worry about.

AFR 185 would work VERY well on a 302 with different pistons. With such a "big" cylinder head on a stock bottom end 302, you're going to have to flycut the hell out of the pistons and you're going to lose a TON of compression in the process.

Joe
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Clearance
  • 1993mustang50
  • Apr 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
165
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
2000xp8
Staytuned stock bottem end build...
  • rednotch
  • Dec 13, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
337
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 13, 2025
Noobz347
Big Posi and Neg wire from Starter to Battery and Alt wires..........
  • from6to8
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
227
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 9, 2026
AeroCoupe
D
What's it Worth? Considering Selling '82 Fairmont Futura Body Shell
  • DonMay63
  • Apr 5, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
0
Views
100
What is it Worth?!?!? Apr 5, 2026
DonMay63
D
S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
699
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jun 19, 2026
spencergt66
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?