• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Air/fuel Swing In Wideband, Car Stutters

  • Thread starter Thread starter 89gtsleeper
  • Start date Start date Jul 31, 2016
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

89gtsleeper

Member
May 20, 2016
66
6
18
40
Aug 1, 2016
#21
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #21
Ok guys. Decided to take a look at mass air and here are my findings. Engine running, voltage between pins A and B is 14 volts. I think I'm good there. Next, with the maf off the car and in the house, I checked resistance between pins A and B, then from C to D. The results were both at only around 4-5k ohms... Much lower than the 10k mentioned above. I put the meter back on the car, then probed between C and D with the car at idle. Only comes up with about .25 volts. Reached in and gave it a few throttle jabs while watching the meter, and it only jumped to around 1.1 volts at the most. Could this meter be the problem?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,184
21,354
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Aug 1, 2016
#22
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #22
89gtsleeper said:
MAF is a pro-m 75 mm calibrated for 42 lb injectors.
Click to expand...


This is the elephant in the room. Does anyone know why? Where are the digital tuner dudes? @hoopty5.0
 

89gtsleeper

Member
May 20, 2016
66
6
18
40
Aug 1, 2016
#23
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #23
Or Is the low voltage simply pro-m's way of trying to trick the computer into altering the pulse width of the injectors?
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,789
6,940
214
SW Houston
Aug 1, 2016
#24
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #24
If you're still running with the a9l, unplug the MAF and see how it runs. If it's an improvement in limp mode, your MAF may be shot
 

89gtsleeper

Member
May 20, 2016
66
6
18
40
Aug 1, 2016
#25
  • Aug 1, 2016
  • #25
hoopty5.0 said:
If you're still running with the a9l, unplug the MAF and see how it runs. If it's an improvement in limp mode, your MAF may be shot
Click to expand...
Thx. That's the next thing on my list. I'll update tomorrow evening.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
80
Dublin GA
lowendmac.com
Aug 2, 2016
#26
  • Aug 2, 2016
  • #26
89gtsleeper said:
Ok guys. Decided to take a look at mass air and here are my findings. Engine running, voltage between pins A and B is 14 volts. I think I'm good there. Next, with the maf off the car and in the house, I checked resistance between pins A and B, then from C to D. The results were both at only around 4-5k ohms... Much lower than the 10k mentioned above. I put the meter back on the car, then probed between C and D with the car at idle. Only comes up with about .25 volts. Reached in and gave it a few throttle jabs while watching the meter, and it only jumped to around 1.1 volts at the most. Could this meter be the problem?
Click to expand...
That does not look good at all...
Use the diagram to locate the MAF output pins on the computer connector. Hook up your DVM or Multimeter, get a helper to watch the meter and go for a drive. Then compare your results to the figures posted in the MAF test path.
 

89gtsleeper

Member
May 20, 2016
66
6
18
40
Aug 2, 2016
#27
  • Aug 2, 2016
  • #27
Haven't driven it yet, but with the mass air unplugged, the car is reasonably similar. Seemed to start up a little easier than normal, but it is still acting the same as far as swinging rich then lean. That aspect seems unaffected. I'll clear the codes then take her for a spin tonight with the mass air on and checking signal. If that still doesn't look good, I'll try driving around the block without mass air to see if any better.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,184
21,354
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Aug 2, 2016
#28
  • Aug 2, 2016
  • #28
An A9L, 42 lb/hr injectors, and a calibrated MAF...

In my experience, it's going to run like crap until it's tuned.

Injector pulse minimums and injector pulse slopes differ too much from the behavior of 19 lb/hr injectors for this setup to run well without a tune.

Yes, your calibrated MAF will "lie" to the computer and tell it that there is only W amount of air versus X amount of air (this lowers the injector pulse so that the 42 comes down far enough to be equivalent to the 19s in this condition).

As the mass of air rises, the meter sends an approximate equivalent to compensate for the larger injector.

What the computer DOESN'T know is how a 42 lb injector really acts. The minimum pulse for a 42 lb/hr injector is much lower than that of a 19. The EEC doesn't know this and a tune is required in order to force the EEC to adjust for these differences.

Now... There are some mechanically tuned alternatives that work great on the race-track. You on the other hand, are shooting for power and streetability. You need a tune. If in doubt about the meter, send it in and have it checked. They can also provide you with a detailed 32 point transfer function (for your tuner).

Air Flow Research makes probably the best aftermarket meters but you still need to remember that 'calibrated' meters will sacrifice resolution (the more the better for drive ability) when they shorten the scale to accommodate for larger injectors.

Reliably, 30 lb/hr injectors are about as large as I would go with nothing but a 'calibrated' meter. The further you get from 19 lb/hr injectors, the more there is to compensate for than just a formula for calculating the mass of air being ingested.
 

89gtsleeper

Member
May 20, 2016
66
6
18
40
Aug 3, 2016
#29
  • Aug 3, 2016
  • #29
I've been thinking a lot about the injector size and plans for the car. I agree 42 is really stout unless I install a blower cam and turn the boost way up. I'm going to drop this thing down to 30 lb injectors. Found a deal on some solid frpp 30 lb and a matching 75 mm pro-m. Keep it simple at 5-6 lbs boost and this should be a good combo. It will also give me an opportunity to redo some vacuum lines and plugs on the upper intake and work over the PCV config. I'll have this knocked out in the next week or so, and will report my findings.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 3, 2016
#30
  • Aug 3, 2016
  • #30
Leave the injectors and MAF where they are. They aren't the problem. You need to have the car retuned. You know as well as anyone, that 5-6psi will keep you satisfied until about the next pay check, then you'll be looking for more. Only you won't be able to, because after you swap to the 30's, you won't have the injector to support it. Spend the money you're thinking of dropping on the injector/MAF combo on a new tune. Your drivability issues will be gone and you'll be back into boost before you know it.

The 42's can be tuned to run just like stock. I've got 60's in mine and they'll tune up just fine. Heck, the new thing is 80lb injectors now for the forced induction crowd. No such thing as too much injector anymore.
 
Reactions: Davedacarpainter, a91what and Noobz347

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
37
Hillsborough county
Aug 3, 2016
#31
  • Aug 3, 2016
  • #31
Very true... hell I just tuned a 1.6l Honda with a mega squirt ecu, 75lb injectors idles like stock.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,184
21,354
234
Box behind Walmart
www.stangnet.com
Aug 3, 2016
#32
  • Aug 3, 2016
  • #32
Gearbanger 101 said:
Leave the injectors and MAF where they are. They aren't the problem. You need to have the car retuned. You know as well as anyone, that 5-6psi will keep you satisfied until about the next pay check, then you'll be looking for more. Only you won't be able to, because after you swap to the 30's, you won't have the injector to support it. Spend the money you're thinking of dropping on the injector/MAF combo on a new tune. Your drivability issues will be gone and you'll be back into boost before you know it.

The 42's can be tuned to run just like stock. I've got 60's in mine and they'll tune up just fine. Heck, the new thing is 80lb injectors now for the forced induction crowd. No such thing as too much injector anymore.
Click to expand...

What he said
 

89gtsleeper

Member
May 20, 2016
66
6
18
40
Aug 3, 2016
#33
  • Aug 3, 2016
  • #33
So I can't believe this, but it think I figured out a large portion of my issue... Though I'm still trying to make sense of why this issue would have just started out of nowhere. So a few weeks ago I was reading about crank case pressure and I read how most people that install a blower remove the vacuum line from the throttle body to the valve cover oil fill tube, then install a breather filter on the valve cover. At the time, I immediately noticed the car ran much better once I did that. Then suddenly I have all this issues weeks later, mid drive. Today I put that vacuum line back on, and voila. Car runs like it did right before the issue started.

However, I'm still cant get it to ever run much more rich than 14 under any throttle condition I've tried. I shouldn't have to put it all the way to the floor and get into 4-6k rpm in order for the car's computer to start pushing toward 12:1 AFR should I? I won't do that until I have the tune in better shape in terms of pulling the timing during boost and possibly installing fmu or chip to get fuel pressure increased on the top end.
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
37
Hillsborough county
Aug 3, 2016
#34
  • Aug 3, 2016
  • #34
if your getting into any kind of boost then you will show lean....
consider this 7psi has the effect of adding 50% atmosphere into the engine.. that means your engine is consuming 50% more air [generally speaking theres a lot more to it than this] you need more fuel to make it even out.

Don't go into boost without a FMU/ TUNE.
 

89gtsleeper

Member
May 20, 2016
66
6
18
40
Aug 9, 2016
#35
  • Aug 9, 2016
  • #35
Got the msd btm installed to handle timing. Car is running fine for daily drive duty. Fmu with discs will be here tomorrow, and also have a new fuel pressure regulator for peace of mind. Prob going to try the 4:1 disc first. Going to tackle all that this weekend and see what she does. Trying to figure out if I want to alter my pcv setup while I've got the upper intake off.
 

elarm1

10 Year Member
Dec 17, 2010
1,428
652
154
N.Va
Aug 11, 2016
#36
  • Aug 11, 2016
  • #36
Woah, I think your in dangerous territory without a tune. What fp, spark plugs, heat range. Your playing with fire....ask a man who's popped two sets of hgs playing with settings.
 

89gtsleeper

Member
May 20, 2016
66
6
18
40
Aug 11, 2016
#37
  • Aug 11, 2016
  • #37
Running new autolite plugs a heat range colder than stock gapped at 35. Fuel pressure a little higher than stock, about 42 with vac removed. Car seems happier there than 39 for daily use. Btm set to kick in at 0 boost and pull 1.5 degrees per pound of boost. Mityvac will be here tomorrow so I can verify and calibrate this setting. Still running base timing at 10 degrees.
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
37
Hillsborough county
Aug 13, 2016
#38
  • Aug 13, 2016
  • #38
Start with the 10:1 disk in the fmu... remember rich will save the motor lean kills. Afr in boost shoot for 11.5
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
01 mustang 3.8 fuel pressure issue
  • Mhaley2006
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
228
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sunday at 2:52 PM
JohnKay
J
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
178
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
598
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
C
03 Cobra Low Fuel Pressure
  • CTsnake_03
  • Mar 17, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
282
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
CTsnake_03
C
1
Engine 91 mustang 302 Low acceleration car backfires pops and acts like it doesn’t want to take fuel
  • 1991Fox5.0
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2025
1991Fox5.0
1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?