• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Aluminum Driveshaft, worth it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter javsvt
  • Start date Start date Jan 13, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Jan 14, 2006
#21
  • Jan 14, 2006
  • #21
if you're loaded get a carbon fiber driveshaft. look at that power it reclaimed on this bullitt. like i said, if you're loaded. i think they're like $1100.

http://www.stangpro.com/html/articles/driveshaft.htm
 

xseler8

Member
May 4, 2004
619
0
17
Montgomery County,Pa.
Jan 14, 2006
#22
  • Jan 14, 2006
  • #22
ponysarepretty said:
How is that any different from a steel driveshaft car with a lot of power?
Click to expand...
Any drive shaft can break - or the "U" joint can fail. A DS loop prevents pole vaulting.
 

02GTdroptop

New Member
Jul 15, 2005
26
2
0
Ft. Hood, Texas
Jan 14, 2006
#23
  • Jan 14, 2006
  • #23
Exactly. Aluminum is just automatically more predisposed to breakage under torque than steel, that's all.
 

imblown-ru

New Member
Dec 6, 2005
247
0
0
Roanoke VA
Jan 15, 2006
#24
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #24
i thought carbon fiber shafts were more around 600...oh well im getting one, and am finally gonna post hp increases, and exact 1/4 mile increases
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Jan 15, 2006
#25
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #25
imblown-ru said:
i thought carbon fiber shafts were more around 600...oh well im getting one, and am finally gonna post hp increases, and exact 1/4 mile increases
Click to expand...
well, I just posted what the one in that link cost. they probably can be had for less. StangPro reclaimed 5.7hp and 8.1 ft/lbs on the dyno, but his 1/8th miles times had mixed results. He did however cut 0.2 off his R/T and a slight increase in MPH due to the reclaimed hp. If you're serious about racing, or just performance in general, I'd say they're worth it.
 
J

Justin03GT

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
199
0
0
Mount Pleasant, SC
Jan 15, 2006
#26
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #26
helty said:
He did however cut 0.2 off his R/T .....
Click to expand...


how did the DS and proclaimed power cut time off the R/T? is it something magical that makes you react faster cause the aluminum is sending signals to your brain?
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Jan 15, 2006
#27
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #27
Justin03GT said:
how did the DS and proclaimed power cut time off the R/T? is it something magical that makes you react faster cause the aluminum is sending signals to your brain?
Click to expand...
we're not talking about aluminum smartass. perhaps the lighter weight of the carbon fiber compared to the steel allowed the driveshaft to spin just that much quicker? hell i dont know im just telling him what StangPro reported from his dyno pulls and track times. he's on here, ask him.

think about it. you use the same force to rotate a 20lb steel shaft as you do an 11lb CF shaft, which one rotates quicker?
The throttle response probably had quite a bit to do with the reaction time while the added HP aided the ending MPH.
Click to expand...
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jan 15, 2006
#28
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #28
the aluminum only weighs 3 #s more...I mean what a 1/2 HP difference? LOL. Ill just get aluminum when the time cames...im sure ill get a good 4hp then. Every little bit helps . If it made 295 with it I would be happy lol. "people with aluminum DSs will be ****ching to CF ones evenetually, and it will become the standard" HAHA, not unless they come off of that price! Screw that, im not stupid....1000bucks for 5HP and smoother driving? No thanks.

BTW someone mentioned the dog bone thing...i took mine OFF and noticed absolutly ZERO difference in vibration, but it did weigh 9#s. 3.73s with stock DS. You know I take that back...it got better! I used to get this WHOOM WHOOM WHOOM thing going on after a high speed run...kinda like my DS was out of ballance. Would last for about a day then go away. Havnt had that problem since I removed that thing.
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Jan 15, 2006
#29
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #29
hey, i just threw it out there. never did i claim CF driveshafts are the end all solution to performance. bishes.

StangPro lurks around here, ask him for the dyno sheet and an explanation. all i did was find the article and post it. quit busting my balls
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 15, 2006
#30
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #30
DP
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 15, 2006
#31
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #31
Keep in mind, that even if the slightly lighter rotational mass, equals a big difference when you really get these suckers spinning at top end.
 
J

Justin03GT

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
199
0
0
Mount Pleasant, SC
Jan 15, 2006
#32
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #32
i was just busting balls...no amount of power can make your R/T time go down, R/T is ALL driver
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Jan 15, 2006
#33
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #33
Justin03GT said:
i was just busting balls...no amount of power can make your R/T time go down, R/T is ALL driver
Click to expand...
I know you're just ball busting, I'm used to it around these parts. and I know R/T is all driver, hence the reason my best to date is a 0.9

i sat around thinking about it last night anyway. what if the same driver makes 2 runs down the track: 1 with a 20lb DS and 1 with a 10lb DS. Both times his reaction to the light is identical. Because the engine has less rotational mass to spin with the 10lb DS, isnt it fathomable that the engine torque will transfer to the rear wheels just a hair quicker than the 20lb DS, allowing the car to hook and break the plane even the slightest bit before the 20lb DS would allow?

just a guess.
 

joshheat25

Member
Nov 8, 2004
871
0
16
Delaware
Jan 15, 2006
#34
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #34
just get the aluminum! I plan on eventually getting one! after a blower!
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jan 15, 2006
#35
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #35
^Yes it will to an extent. Reaction time has MAINLY to do with driver though. Just like adding power, or slicks, it WILL break the beam faster providing the traction is there. But my point is the SLIGHT weight difference of CF vs aluminum...its not worth it to me . I can put that towards some heads or that aluminum intake ill be buying .
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Jan 15, 2006
#36
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #36
hotmustang331 said:
I can put that towards some heads and heads only. Nothing else besides heads .
Click to expand...
fixt.

on the CF vs. Aluminum issue, I wasnt trying to convince anyone that CF is better (although it is lighter and torsionally stronger, not as dangerous if the U-joint fails. It is however, quite a bit more expensive.). I just threw it out there. I'll be damned if I spend that much on a driveshaft, at least until I get very serious about racing, which due to finds wont be for a few years.
 

javsvt

Member
Jun 10, 2005
27
0
7
Westchester County NY
Jan 15, 2006
#37
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #37
Good debate. Dont know waht to do. Maybe ill spend it somewhere else. I get know vibrations now with my 4.10s. Ill just wait till i do get vibrations. Ill sleep on it. Thanx for the info.
 

menasci

Member
Aug 17, 2003
640
1
16
Chandler, AZ
Jan 15, 2006
#38
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #38
I have one.
Not sure if it made a difference.
But, it is lighter and more balanced, so that's got to be good.
Also, MOST high performance and luxury cars have aluminum driveshafts, must be a reason.
 
C

Chris00GT

Founding Member
Jan 28, 2001
275
0
16
York Springs, PA
Jan 15, 2006
#39
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #39
I've dyno'ed my car to see how much gain for an aluminum drive shaft. The results were 0rwhp gain and a gain of 7rwtq.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jan 15, 2006
#40
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #40
helty said:
fixt.

on the CF vs. Aluminum issue, I wasnt trying to convince anyone that CF is better (although it is lighter and torsionally stronger, not as dangerous if the U-joint fails. It is however, quite a bit more expensive.). I just threw it out there. I'll be damned if I spend that much on a driveshaft, at least until I get very serious about racing, which due to finds wont be for a few years.
Click to expand...

I know lol, i even forgot you were the thread starter for most of this thread....but its a very informative thread. VERY good idea for someone with a high HP car (500+).
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
New guy- first Stang- I love it !!
  • smid333
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
179
The Welcome Wagon Mar 23, 2026
smid333
S
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
258
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
O
injectors keeping up?
  • optionizerSS
  • Apr 4, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
298
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2025
optionizerSS
O
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
79
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?