• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Aluminum vs steel driveshaft.

  • Thread starter Thread starter bock
  • Start date Start date Apr 3, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Apr 4, 2006
#21
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #21
Ive dropped both shafts - the steel one got repaired with new u-joints and the aluminum one is now a paper weight (bent). Get ANY shaft that has had new gears put in it a quality balancing.
 

onefstsnake

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
792
1
0
Northern VA
Apr 4, 2006
#22
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #22
90bronconate said:
huh?
Click to expand...

There are different grades/types of steel...
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,359
209
114
Ohio
Apr 5, 2006
#23
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #23
After my gear swap my car picked up a slight vibration, the FMS Aluminum one took the Vibes away completely.

Who Dey, LOL We Dey!
 

393Bird

Founding Member
Jun 26, 2002
244
0
0
Clarksville Tennessee
Apr 5, 2006
#24
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #24
My complete drive train is new. The last item to be replaced was the drive shaft, since I had vibration above 80, and very bad above 90. I installed a aluminum drive shaft last month, and it is as smooth as silk. My aluminum one is 9 lbs lighter than the factory steel one. It looks nice also.

 

Attachments

  • leftpipebottom6.webp
    57.6 KB · Views: 193

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Apr 5, 2006
#25
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #25
They probably have a better balance than the factory shafts. Whataya think? Are they a larger diameter? Do they need to have a better balance?

Let me requalify - get any steel shaft that has not been custom balanced - custom balanced with a gear change.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Apr 5, 2006
#26
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #26
Ahhh... since this is a thread full of folks talking from their rear ends... I think that I wold like to do the same.... Here's how it was explained to me....

The FMS aluminum DS (overall) is slightly stronger than the stock piece. The aluminum is more rigid meaning that it changes shape a LOT less during it's life. The problem is that when it DOES change shape then that's it. It's over, ca-put, scrap, whereas the steel drive shaft is considerably more flexible and will/does change shape thousands of times during the course of extreme duty (even normal duty for that matter). Not a problem until metal fatigue starts to set in (dependant on how often it's put in that condition).

So... though there's not a HUGE difference in strength between the units, the durability factor for modified cars is supposed to be greatly improved with an aluminum DS. The number of instances where "It's been fine all this time until one day... SNAP!" are supposed to be reduced by using material that keeps it's shape right up to containing enough force to destroy it completely.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 5, 2006
#27
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #27
I'd love to see how many people HAVE them that rip on them...lol Whoever said aluminum flexes...get your facts straight. Aluminum is more rigid than steel, which reduces flex and drivetrain vibration. Aluminum requires less weight to balance, which also adds (subtracts?) to the weight difference. The FMS shaft is tubular, which also adds to weight loss. The yokes are beefed up to assist in durability. I know guys pushing 600+ who do 5k clutch drops on slicks who aren't even TESTING how strong these shafts are. You guys need to think physics for a second...you really think an aircraft grade tubular aluminum shaft is going to twist BEFORE the universals blow out? Everything has a weak link, and that's usually where you want it when it comes to a drive shaft. Steel on the other hand, flexes too much, vibrates too much, and as someone else said i've seen them twist like a twizler and fly out from under a car looking like a chewed up straw. You'll see universals blow out before you twist an aluminum shaft. If that scares you, then decide one of two things... A) does my mostly stock and/or bolt on Mustang make enough power to actually blow apart that universal? and B) if yes, then you probably should have already invested in a driveshaft safety loop, and it won't matter what your shaft is made of because you're going to be busting universals all day anyways.

On a side note....do any of you think Ferrari uses steel drive shafts?
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
Apr 5, 2006
#28
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #28
Uhhh guys, no need to be retarded, steel is far more rigded than Al. Mild low carbon steel (something like 1020) has an modulus of elastisity of around 30,000 KSI, and 6061T6 is around 10,000. That means Steel is 3 time more ridged.

as for Fatiuge stregth around 15,000KSI for 60601T6 and 100,000 for mild steel, so you can do a ton more clutch drops with steel

keep in mind this is just material properties, There are many other factors that affect the ultimite streagth of a driveshaft, but lets get our facts strait before we dive into those.

a Alumium driveshaft has to be larger diameter to keep streagth up, becasue the larger dia spreads out the hoop stress (the fundamental reason you twist up a driveshaft)

HISSIN50 is dead on about the increase in diameter of an AL driveshaft affecting rotational inertia. Does the decrease in weight of the Al shaft cancel out the increase on roational interia from the increased diameter? I don't know, but one of us should really test it.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Apr 5, 2006
#29
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #29
352Ford2 said:
Does the decrease in weight of the Al shaft cancel out the increase on roational interia from the increased diameter? I don't know, but one of us should really test it.
Click to expand...


Ugh, the math on that would be intense not to mention you need someone to cut open a steel and AL driveshaft to figure out the wall thickness and you need the exact diameter of the shafts and the mass of each excluding the u-joints.

Then you could calculate the rotational forces acting on them. I'm too lazy to crack open some of my engineering books and figure it out, especially if you are missing some key info. I do think it could be easily solved.
 

$uperstang

New Member
Jul 20, 2004
476
1
0
Detroit, MI
Apr 5, 2006
#30
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #30
bock said:
My real problem is vibration

I have tried 2 different DS and it still vibrate.

Feel like coming from the rear end...

really vibrate from 75-80 mph and up... in gear or not...
Click to expand...
I have an idea, get your tires balanced.
 

DeadLifter

Member
Mar 1, 2006
183
2
19
Portland, IN
Apr 5, 2006
#31
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #31
My car had 4.10's in it when i got it with the stock ds and had an annoying vibration at highway speeds. I just put an aluminum one in yesterday and it completely solved the problem.
 
8

89white50

Member
Nov 16, 2004
440
1
18
central MA
Apr 5, 2006
#32
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #32
Ford says somewhere how much stronger the Aluminum piece is over the stocker. My stock ds was a complete pile of ****. I couldnt believe how much lighter and nicer the AL piece was when i got it. My car is also smooth as silk with it. the u joints the AL piece comes with are also very high quality.
And whoever said their AL Driveshaft is rubbing thier emergency break brackets....damn bud. I was just under there sat changing the gears to 327's (much better than the 355's IMO...another story), and thats quite a bit of distance to be traveling, i would fix that pronto before you junk both your ds and brackets. but i do see where you are talking about. stinks man...
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Apr 5, 2006
#33
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #33
Anyone think the move to a AL drive shaft making things smoother might be due to a better balance? Try putting in new joints and balancing a steel shaft and see what happens. yeesh......
 
8

89white50

Member
Nov 16, 2004
440
1
18
central MA
Apr 5, 2006
#34
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #34
well no kidding, im not trying to set the world on fire here. its a nice piece and was in the budget, looks better, and is stronger. obviously the smoother ride is from correct balance, but put the two side by side and its a no brainer.

for a DD
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Apr 5, 2006
#35
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #35
If my steel driveshaft "looked better" I would put it back on...in my case it didn't do anything...I guess it was balanced well enough.
 

bock

Founding Member
Jan 7, 2002
648
2
19
Montreal,Qc
Apr 5, 2006
#36
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #36
The vibration came after changing:

clutch(flywheel resufaced,new pilot,throw out bearings)
t-lock rebuilt kit( done with the 4 clutchs method)
new lower controls arms (granatelli weight jackers)
boxed upper with new poly bushings.

No vibration in neutral at any rpm.When going 80 mph if put in neutral,it still vibrate and it go slowly when slowing down...

Can it come from an incorectly rebuit t-lock?
Or can i have a bent shaft in the tranny? (is this possible?)
 

bock

Founding Member
Jan 7, 2002
648
2
19
Montreal,Qc
Apr 5, 2006
#37
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #37
i cheked the tail shaft bushing.... maybe 1/16 of play....
 

blackstangt

Member
May 31, 2004
460
1
19
ny
Apr 6, 2006
#38
  • Apr 6, 2006
  • #38
my caprice driveshaft broke like a pepsi can twisting and shredding right in the middle , steel, but rusty , let me see if i can get you guys the pic.

link
 

bock

Founding Member
Jan 7, 2002
648
2
19
Montreal,Qc
Apr 6, 2006
#39
  • Apr 6, 2006
  • #39
Ok

I have change the d/s of position and the vibration went down a bit.

When going 75-80 mph you can ear it a bit.... but when in neutral at this speed,its loader,but i dont feel it so much.its more the sound of it.

For sure it come from the rear.
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,359
209
114
Ohio
Apr 6, 2006
#40
  • Apr 6, 2006
  • #40
bock said:
Ok

I have change the d/s of position and the vibration went down a bit.

When going 75-80 mph you can ear it a bit.... but when in neutral at this speed,its loader,but i dont feel it so much.its more the sound of it.

For sure it come from the rear.
Click to expand...

Did you line up the lines when installing the new Driveshaft?


Who Dey, LOL, We Dey!!!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Sponsored New Release: 2024+ S650 Brembo Rear Stainless Steel Braided Brake Lines
  • MRaburn
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
196
2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk Mar 6, 2026
MRaburn
Sponsored New J&M Release: 2024+ S650 Full Front + Rear Stainless Steel Braided Brake Lines
  • MRaburn
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
349
2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk Mar 6, 2026
MRaburn
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
862
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Hood......
  • Blue85
  • Jun 24, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
355
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 28, 2025
limp
R
Progress Thread A small update on our first-gen Mustang project
  • Restomotive
  • Apr 24, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
100
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 24, 2026
Restomotive
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?