• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

American Racin T70R are back

  • Thread starter Thread starter nemlio65
  • Start date Start date Jan 30, 2008

nemlio65

Member
Oct 12, 2006
87
0
6
Jan 30, 2008
#1
  • Jan 30, 2008
  • #1
http://americanracing.com/wheels/de...desc=1-piece painted/machined wheel&section=V

Has anyone ordered the t70r?
 

CanyonCarver515

Member
Jun 27, 2007
122
0
17
El Lay
Jan 30, 2008
#2
  • Jan 30, 2008
  • #2
This is a very nice variation on the 5-spoke design.

I could see this used on an early 70s F-Body car (Camaro/Firebird)
Maybe on 69-70 Mustangs too.

Sizes seem to stop at 15 inches. OK by me, but at least a 16-inch would be a good idea for the restomod crowd, not to mention for the availability of superior tires.
 

yeloxr7

Member
Apr 18, 2005
429
0
16
Jan 30, 2008
#3
  • Jan 30, 2008
  • #3
I wish they would bring back the sandblasted-spoke 200S with the original-style cap......
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Jan 30, 2008
#4
  • Jan 30, 2008
  • #4
Doesn't look like they come in the optimal offset/backspacing for use on the mustang to me.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Jan 30, 2008
#5
  • Jan 30, 2008
  • #5
dodgestang said:
Doesn't look like they come in the optimal offset/backspacing for use on the mustang to me.
Click to expand...

I don't know why they have not figured out what fit our cars yet. Who are they building them for? They would work for 67-70 with 64-66 rear ends. Which I thought about doing.
 

4MuscleMachines

Member
Jul 20, 2005
417
1
17
South Texas
Jan 31, 2008
#6
  • Jan 31, 2008
  • #6
IMO, still looks too similar to a dozen other wheels out there.
 
H

Helmantel

New Member
Aug 9, 2006
206
1
0
Jan 31, 2008
#7
  • Jan 31, 2008
  • #7
dodgestang said:
Doesn't look like they come in the optimal offset/backspacing for use on the mustang to me.
Click to expand...

At least they have 1/4" more backspacing than regular TTD's. 225's would still be a tight fit on a 65-66 though.
 

hungrymonkey

White by Birth, Trash By Choice
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,077
12
108
Oregon.
Feb 2, 2008
#8
  • Feb 2, 2008
  • #8
4MuscleMachines said:
IMO, still looks too similar to a dozen other wheels out there.
Click to expand...
x2

not much difference
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

2
Electrical mayhem
  • 2000ElectricGreen
  • Mar 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
281
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
2000ElectricGreen
2
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
R
1965 mustang body work, Complete Floor Pan Assembly install questions
  • runawayabc123
  • Jun 1, 2022
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
12
Views
7K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Sep 14, 2025
GOvert
G
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?