• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Another 1.7RR question

  • Thread starter Thread starter cmozez
  • Start date Start date Apr 4, 2004
C

cmozez

Member
May 3, 2003
450
0
16
Tupelo,Mississippi
Apr 4, 2004
#1
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #1
I did a search first and may be more confused than when I started. I have a few questions.I have no plans of replacing the heads or the cam, I have a Cobra intake and 3:73 gears waiting to be installed

1- With the intake, gears and the stuff in my sig, will I get my performance dollars worth out of some 1.7RR while I am installing the intake?I don't want to mess with it if it isn't worth while.

2- If I do get some, as I understand, the Crane Cobras will fit under my stock valve covers with no mods. Is this true?

3- Would I get anything from a bigger MAF instead of the RR's or both?

4- Would a tweecer do me anygood after I do whatever changes I decided to do or do I even have enough mods to mess with it?

I know everyone is going to say "save your money for H/C" but I don't want to go that route. I don't want to have to change injectors either.I don't want to put much more money in the motor.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Apr 4, 2004
#2
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #2
3- Would I get anything from a bigger MAF instead of the RR's or both?

4- Would a tweecer do me anygood after I do whatever changes I decided to do or do I even have enough mods to mess with it?
Click to expand...

3- I think there is a larger chance of having problems with the MAF and possibly no power gain. The benifits are alittle unpredictable.

4- Depends on how you look at it. I don't think that the cost will justify the performance gains. But it would still be a good thing to have anyway, that's just me.
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Apr 4, 2004
#3
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #3
do the 1.7s for sure

you wont need a tweecer, it wont effect the computer
 

hawaiian

Founding Member
Feb 23, 2002
321
0
0
South Miami Fl
Apr 4, 2004
#4
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #4
as far as i have gathered and im sure its gonna be debated but the 1.7rr is genrally an option for people who dont want to do their cam. if you read my sig i did both but they where chosen for me and i would prefer a good cut cam and 1.6rr. the reason i prefer the 1.6 is that on the tips of my valves i noticed the wear pattern is offcenter which is a good sign my valvetrain is outta wack but insufficient funds and patience are holding me back from redoing it myself.
 
C

cmozez

Member
May 3, 2003
450
0
16
Tupelo,Mississippi
Apr 4, 2004
#5
  • Apr 4, 2004
  • #5
Thanks for the replys. Anyone else?
 
C

cmozez

Member
May 3, 2003
450
0
16
Tupelo,Mississippi
Apr 5, 2004
#6
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #6
bump
 

WHITE94COBRA

New Member
Nov 14, 2003
816
0
0
HUNTINGTON BEACH
Apr 5, 2004
#7
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #7
Ok here is your answeres

1. Yes you will feel a power gain from 1.7 RR's not a bunch but some none the less, They will fit under your stock valve covers (crane gold cobra RR's for sure), tweecer is a good investment if you plan on taking the time to learn it and use it properly, and more mods in the future. MAF meter will make you some more power but unpredictable how much. If your looking for RR's I have my stock cobras sitting in my garage I also still have my gt 40 heads sitting there as well as the stock cam. They have about 30000 miles on them.
 

mustangt93

New Member
Apr 17, 2003
37
0
0
San Antonio TX
Apr 5, 2004
#8
  • Apr 5, 2004
  • #8
you have to remove the baffel from the passenger side valve cover in order for the rockers to work, i believe you would benefit more from the rockers than a maf, do the intake and the gears, and while you have the intake off, throw in those 1.7s, you wont be dissapointed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Broken lower intake bolts
  • Mike3
  • Aug 11, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
16
Views
576
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sep 2, 2025
revhead347
J
Transmission
  • Jraesims
  • Mar 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
157
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 8, 2026
JD1964
J
'04 3.8L V6 mineral deposits and oil on #3 cylinder. Does it need a rebuild or something simpler?
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 18, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
197
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Tuesday at 10:49 AM
joeybuddy96
J
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
466
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?