• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

another 8" vs. 9" debate...

  • Thread starter Thread starter jst6
  • Start date Start date Nov 17, 2004

jst6

Founding Member
Jan 9, 2002
152
0
0
Tucson, AZ
Nov 17, 2004
#1
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #1
ok, i've been planning to get a 9" with 3.50's or 3.55's and a detroit locker with 31 splines for the extra strength and worry free opperation. however, some guys at the local speed shop (these guys are hardcore drag racers and run plenty fast) told me that the 8" if properly built should get me to the 11's with with 3.55's and a locker. That seems kinda far fetched as i've never read anyones post saying that 8's will handle that kind of power.

i know this will be a question so... the motor that's coming is a 331 with AFR 205s and a custom cam turning 430lb/ft of torque. i'm still debating myself as to the five speed conv or beef up the c-4.

so do you guys think that little 8" can hold that kind of juice?
 
M

mustangbrad

Member
Aug 16, 2004
127
5
19
Nov 17, 2004
#2
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #2
I'm a big fan of the 8" rear, but with that kind of power I would go with the 9". I agree that a 8 could make into the 11's, but for how long. For miles and miles of durability with that kind of power go 9".
 

stangman67

Member
Feb 8, 2003
294
0
17
connecticut
Nov 17, 2004
#3
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #3
I guess it depends on your tranny choice. With a racing C4, Id say 9" but if you you use a T5, it would break before you rear does. On the other hand, you are most likely considering a tremec 3550 or TKO 400 or 500, in which case mr. eight would be the weak link. I myself am running a 289 with maybe 350 ft/lbs, and I plan to get a T5Z with 4.11s, powertrax lockrite, upgraded 28 spline axles, all with the 8". I feel that it should handle some strip abuse and typical street driving.
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Nov 17, 2004
#4
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #4
I don't understand any of this debating over 8" or 9", 9" is stronger for fact, why would anyone what to spend money on an 8".
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Nov 17, 2004
#5
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #5
Cuz it's lighter and uses less horsepower. Most people already own one as well.

That being said, I would still go 9 inch in your application.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Nov 17, 2004
#6
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #6
I agree with you Worth. Play it safe and swap in a 9". Ford never put an 8" behind an engine making more than 225 gross hp, why would you? The people that designed the 8" knew it couldn't handle more power.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Nov 17, 2004
#7
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #7
WORTH said:
I don't understand any of this debating over 8" or 9", 9" is stronger for fact, why would anyone what to spend money on an 8".
Click to expand...
I agree the 9" will handle more and I contemplated it for a long time. In the end it came down to total price and the fact that my build is on the upper limits of the 8". I'll have ~380 FWHP running through a four spider 3.80 8" traction-loc with street tires. I'm also running a T5Z, centerforce clutch, and billet flywheel.

I'm doing my build on the cheap. I spent $500 for a built 8" center section. Comparing this to $1,000+ for a 9" center plus housing was the kicker for me. If I do eventually break the RR, at least I can justify to the wife why I need the extra cash for the 9er.

My total drivetrain budget was $2,000.
Total net drivetrain cost to date: $2,010

T5Z Tranny - $700 (used)
Billet Steel Flywheel - $50 (used)
Centerforce Clutch - $90 (used)
Lakewood Scattershield - $100 (used)
Aluminum Driveshaft - $80 (used)
8" 3.80 Traction Loc Pumpkin - $500 (new gears, rebuilt diff.)
Mustang Steve Cable Clutch - $200 (new)
T5 Mounting Bracket - $75 (new)
Tranny Mount - $15 (new)
Refurbished Pedals - $125 (used)
RR Bearings - $75 (new)
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Nov 17, 2004
#8
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #8
Max Power said:
Cuz it's lighter and uses less horsepower. Most people already own one as well.

That being said, I would still go 9 inch in your application.
Click to expand...

SHow me the Mustang that doesn't need more weight in the rear.
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Nov 17, 2004
#9
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #9
WORTH said:
SHow me the Mustang that doesn't need more weight in the rear.
Click to expand...

exactly, that would be the reason the front of mine is smashed up
 

12sec67

Active Member
Oct 6, 2003
1,301
1
36
San Diego, Ca
Nov 17, 2004
#10
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #10
66P51GT said:
My total drivetrain budget was $2,000.
Total net drivetrain cost to date: $2,010

T5Z Tranny - $700 (used)
Billet Steel Flywheel - $50 (used)
Centerforce Clutch - $90 (used)
Lakewood Scattershield - $100 (used)
Aluminum Driveshaft - $80 (used)
8" 3.80 Traction Loc Pumpkin - $500 (new gears, rebuilt diff.)
Mustang Steve Cable Clutch - $200 (new)
T5 Mounting Bracket - $75 (new)
Tranny Mount - $15 (new)
Refurbished Pedals - $125 (used)
RR Bearings - $75 (new)
Click to expand...

i spent that much on my rear end with gaskets and fluid
then again on my tranny and conversion, then again on my rims

its worth every penny
 

jbsteven

New Member
Sep 4, 2004
156
0
0
Nov 17, 2004
#11
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #11
WORTH said:
SHow me the Mustang that doesn't need more weight in the rear.
Click to expand...

we were just joking about this today. As some of you know I am in the middle of a build up right now which includes amoung other things a 9 inch rear end (which was installed today).


spend the money now and not worry about it again even if you add another 100hp. Add 100hp on the 8 inch and you will then HAVE to get the 9inch.
 

jbsteven

New Member
Sep 4, 2004
156
0
0
Nov 17, 2004
#12
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #12
12sec67 said:
i spent that much on my rear end with gaskets and fluid
then again on my tranny and conversion, then again on my rims

its worth every penny
Click to expand...

yep, mine was $2350 for the rear end. Add $2650 for the transmission, $8000 for the engine, $2400 for the coil over front and at least $3000 for all the other goodies and counting.

I hope my wife does not see this because I would have to buy her a new set of boobs or something.
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Nov 17, 2004
#13
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #13
I am in the process of replacing my 8" with a 9". I have not hurt it badly yet, but it is starting to get louder and started leaking around the pinion housing. I am looking at the "Currie" stage 3 rear axle assemble.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox What cam? 8-10 psi hci 4:11 gears in my 65 EFI swap
  • Foot Hill
  • Jan 27, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 26, 2019
a91what
Excellent Hagerty Article About The "kings Of The Street"
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Sep 21, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2017
NIKwoaC
  • Locked
Just Some Suggestion's For Foxes
  • Detroiit
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2014
Noobz347
Progress Thread 68 Gt500kr Vert - Take Two
  • 68GT500KR_Vert
  • Oct 18, 2013
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
  • 4 5 6
Replies
106
Views
20K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 7, 2022
Potomus Pete
The Thundercolt
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Nov 19, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
35
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 21, 2017
RaggedGT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?