• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Another AFR Head

  • Thread starter Thread starter maximos
  • Start date Start date Sep 28, 2007

maximos

Member
Sep 15, 2005
188
0
16
Columbus, OH
Sep 28, 2007
#1
  • Sep 28, 2007
  • #1
So I've decided to go with some AFR 185 heads. Is there anything I need to check in my engine now before I do the swap? Any type of clearance issues I might come across? I have an Edelbrock Performer 5.0. I also plan to use an
E303 cam. Anything I should replace while I'm in there? Thanks in advance guys.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Sep 28, 2007
#2
  • Sep 28, 2007
  • #2
You'll absolutely need to check PTV clearance if you use them. The AFR 185 heads come with a 2.02 intake valve, and to my knowledge, the only heads that can get away with that on a stock shortblock are Twisted Wedges because they're a canted valve design, versus the inline valve design of AFR's. If you're comfortable with flycutting your pistons and using clay to check clearance, then the 185's are good to go. If not, you may want to consider using the 165 heads. The 1.90 intake valve in those will clear stock pistons, given you're not using a cam with outrageous lift.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 28, 2007
#3
  • Sep 28, 2007
  • #3
The AFR heads have a 23*/23* valve angle as opposed to Trickflow's 15*/17* design.

With that being said, the lower angle of the Trickflow's allows the use of a 2.02" intake valve, while the AFR 185's typically can not. An AFR 165 flows very similar to summit's trickflow heads and they use a 1.90" intake valve.

Check with clay is a good way to see if you will have clearance issues.

By the way, the amount of peak lift is one of the last concerns I would worry about when talking about piston to valve clearance issues. The period of overlap is where the clearance issues occur, with to early intake valve openings and late exhaust closings.
 

maximos

Member
Sep 15, 2005
188
0
16
Columbus, OH
Sep 29, 2007
#4
  • Sep 29, 2007
  • #4
I'm new to everything from the valve covers down so bear with me please. You're talking about Piston to Valve clearance, what exactly is getting in the way of what? Also, I've always liked Twisted Wedge heads, but I've heard numerous stories of how weak the valvetrain is on them, is there any way to beef it up? Or should it even be a concern if I'm don't plan on putting out more than 500hp give/take when I'm finished?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Sep 29, 2007
#5
  • Sep 29, 2007
  • #5
maximos said:
I'm new to everything from the valve covers down so bear with me please. You're talking about Piston to Valve clearance, what exactly is getting in the way of what? Also, I've always liked Twisted Wedge heads, but I've heard numerous stories of how weak the valvetrain is on them, is there any way to beef it up? Or should it even be a concern if I'm don't plan on putting out more than 500hp give/take when I'm finished?
Click to expand...

Hello

How about being more specific with what you want from your Stang

I looked at your sig and you now got some nice stuff
to build upon

Also ... since you are new to all this
Share what you now understand needs to be done
to do to accomplish your goal of 500 hp

We got some knowledgeable peeps here and they will be more than
willing to give you the benefits of their findings from doing what
you are attempting to do with your Stang

Grady
 
M

mojopony

New Member
Sep 9, 2007
71
1
0
Sep 29, 2007
#6
  • Sep 29, 2007
  • #6
Is your bottom end stock? The 185's are a little big for a 302. 165's work good on a stock shortblock. I'm not such a big fan of the E cam. It might be good for certain combos, but I prefer a wider LSA.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 29, 2007
#7
  • Sep 29, 2007
  • #7
maximos said:
I'm new to everything from the valve covers down so bear with me please. You're talking about Piston to Valve clearance, what exactly is getting in the way of what? Also, I've always liked Twisted Wedge heads, but I've heard numerous stories of how weak the valvetrain is on them, is there any way to beef it up? Or should it even be a concern if I'm don't plan on putting out more than 500hp give/take when I'm finished?
Click to expand...

Sorry for the confusion...

What ends up happening during the period of overlap, when both the intake and exhaust valve are open, the piston is near the top of it's travel.

As the intake valve opens on a 2.02" valve (like the AFR 185's), the radial (edge) of the valve can touch the piston. This is called piston to valve clearance/interference.

The AFR angle of 23* makes it where the 2.02" over rides the stock valve reliefs in the piston. Summit's TW heads have a 15* angle for the intake valve, so it will slide right down into the valve relief, instead of overriding the valve reliefs.

Aftermarket pistons takes care of these problems with larger/wider valve reliefs

If you are looking at 500 horsepower, I would look into another block. The stock block tends to want to go kaboom around that range.

Do you want to go with a stroked combination or do you want some boost

As for the valvetrain issues, I believe those have all been solved. There are still quite a few people that refuse to run them because of the past. I have seen a couple guys with higher compression with detonation (not good) crack the combustion chambers.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Sep 29, 2007
#8
  • Sep 29, 2007
  • #8
I also thought the 185's had an "issue" with the bore size in relation to the valve/valve angle to a stock 4.000 bore.

I would get TFS TW heads and the spring upgrade or AFR 165's if you want an alum head to work well with your stock bottom end.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Sep 29, 2007
#9
  • Sep 29, 2007
  • #9
maximos said:
Also, I've always liked Twisted Wedge heads, but I've heard numerous stories of how weak the valvetrain is on them, is there any way to beef it up?
Click to expand...

The springs that come on twisted wedge heads are good enough for the typical mild aftermarket cam's (motorsport letter cams, tfs stg 1 ect) Same goes for afr's, edelbrocks.

You can upgrade the valve train to suit your needs for the camshaft youre running and rpm youre spinning. I just had my twisted wedge heads freshened at my machine shop as I managed to break one of my FTI ps3 springs among other things. We upgraded to crane springs, manley titanium retainers and comp cams 10* locks with proper installed height set. I shift my car near 7,000 rpm so I needed to upgrade to titanium. It doesn't sound like you need that.
 

Zero_chance

Founding Member
May 29, 2001
1,244
7
59
Maricopa, AZ
Sep 29, 2007
#10
  • Sep 29, 2007
  • #10
Id just go with the 165s myself. The AFR website has a test between 165s and185s where the two are nearly identical as far as power numbers are concerned. The 185s only put out between 4 and 15 more HP as the revolutions climb. If memory serves me correctly, the 165s peak in the mid 4000 RPM range and the 185s push it into the mid 5000 RPM range. These tests were done on a 347 with a performer rpm II intake and supporting mods. Im on my playstation 3 so I cant link it but its right there in the small block ford magazin articles. Dont forget, with heads, bigger isnt always better. Depends on what your other mods are and / or your ultimate goal for the car. But if you plan on keepin stock pistons, 165s arent a bad choice.
 

maximos

Member
Sep 15, 2005
188
0
16
Columbus, OH
Sep 29, 2007
#11
  • Sep 29, 2007
  • #11
When all is said and done, I'd like to have a 331 stroker with a blower on it. I've been speaking with the gentlemen at Brothers Performance and I was told that a "seasoned block", like mine, with a girdle on it should be able to handle what I would like to do. Initially I had planned on going with the 165's but 185's seemed more appropriate for what my goal was.

The setup I would like is as follows:
AFR 185's
Ed Curtis Custom Cam
Edelbrock Performer Intake
Vortech V1 T-Trim Supercharger

Thanks for all your help thus far. Really the only thing that is making me consider all of this now is something that took place during my intake swap last weekend. It's kind of a long story, one I don't wish to relive.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Sep 30, 2007
#12
  • Sep 30, 2007
  • #12
I would never run a boosted stroker on a stock block.
 
M

mojopony

New Member
Sep 9, 2007
71
1
0
Sep 30, 2007
#13
  • Sep 30, 2007
  • #13
blksn955.o said:
I would never run a boosted stroker on a stock block.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I'd skip the blower part.
 

maximos

Member
Sep 15, 2005
188
0
16
Columbus, OH
Sep 30, 2007
#14
  • Sep 30, 2007
  • #14
Fair enough...The search for a block begins. Any suggestions?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Sep 30, 2007
#15
  • Sep 30, 2007
  • #15
Yep, a Dart block
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Sep 30, 2007
#16
  • Sep 30, 2007
  • #16
Considering I started with a stock GT Stang

I had nothing but the lowest performing heads, intake, etc when starting
to mod my Stang

I knew I wanted to go NA
and
The application would be using the OEM block for a Street Combo

I saw two main options

1) OEM stuff
2) After market stuff

I had seen the after market stuff out performed the OEM stuff
but
I also saw the gain was usually not more than around 8 to 12%
and
The cost to obtain that last % of power was not the best value around :Word:

I did #1 to start out with self ported E7 heads/intake but bailed out early
as I knew I would want more.

I then went with #2 and things have worked out much
better than I expected

I have since thought about a blower and will do a KB some day

Now after doing all that
and
If I started out all over again from scratch as I did before with the
same OEM block and Street Car application

I'd do the NA combo with ..........
after market parts from the start and totally skip any OEM stuff

however

If I was gonna do a blower ........
I'd do OEM stuff like gt40 heads/intake with the blower

The OEM stuff will make enough power to split the OEM block

Why put expensive after market parts or put a bunch of money
in machine work to stroke the OEM block when .......

As said above ... the less expensive OEM stuff will make big power
with the added air flow from the blower

To me ... It just seems like throwing good money after bad

If you are stock
and
If you KNOW you are gonna go blown

Get the most power for the least amount of dollar spent and you
still will make way more power than the typical NA Street Combo :Word:

Grady
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Sep 30, 2007
#17
  • Sep 30, 2007
  • #17
Dart sportsman or BOSS 302.

strongest avail. but overkill,
Dart iron eagle or world Man-O-War.
 

Zero_chance

Founding Member
May 29, 2001
1,244
7
59
Maricopa, AZ
Sep 30, 2007
#18
  • Sep 30, 2007
  • #18
I agree with Grady. Unless money is no concern, uber expensive heads arent really a necessity. All the flow numbers for heads are given at atmospheric pressure. With a blower, youre going to be stuffing air in there like its going out of style. Granted, an expensive aluminum head does have better characteristics and would flow more under the same circumstances, but youll still make great power if you went say with GT40Ps or a similar head. I was inthe same train of thought as you until Grady made the same exact point and hes right. I dont race and I dont street race so there was no point in me going for the expensive gear I was originally aiming for. I still plan on going with a Vortech myself but Im probably going to stick with GT40 p heads and a GT40 intake because I like the look of them, I like Ford stuff (bleeds Ford blue), they make good down low torque where it matters to me, and the money I save versus aftermarket stuff can be well used elsewhere. If you search on the GT40 p heads, theres some very good articles on them and flow charts and numbers for people that are running them as cast. I think you might be surprised by what theyre gaining. Now on the other hand, if you plan on racing then like has been said, you might want to have a side account saved up because the stock block will be on borrowed time. It would be kind of self defeating to waste all that money on nice top end stuff and keep the stock block. Kind of like putting a new dress on an old wh@re. Looks great on the outside, but underneath its still and old wh@re...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Clearance
  • 1993mustang50
  • Apr 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
165
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
2000xp8
R
New heads
  • Robman8028
  • Jul 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
847
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 31, 2025
gkomo
K
Resolved Need some assistance. Holley Terminator X alongside H/C/I. Very rough/inconsistent idle
  • karhoot
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
108
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
karhoot
K
K
Resolved Weird sound coming from a freshly rebuilt 5.0L
  • karhoot
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
217
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 27, 2026
Mac131
Fox won't crank over and fuel pump won't kick on.
  • djj62478
  • Jun 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
367
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?