I think they are likely to be as hard or worse on the engine to be honest, and I suspect to retain any reliability they will offer similar performance numbers to the s/c's. To make it safe to run bigger bhp numbers will require a full rebuild and a low CR engine.05Stangster said:Seems like the turbo(s) would not be as hard on the motor in the long run. Any word on turbos coming out for the GT? I wonder what hp/tq they would add.
what can I say05Stangster said:300bhp/ton, common, get real. Look at what you wrote, then at part of your signature! You crack me up!
QUOTE:
"And besides a good twin screw setup will see over 700rwhp on the older 2v engine, how much power do you really need?"
PART OF SIGNATURE
"Too Much Power is Just Enough!"
blackbulletgt said:Turbo's are alot easier on the motor because they aren't always under boost but they are more expensive...that being said if you run the same psi on a turbo that you would on the blower it will be harder on the engine because its gonna be making alot more power without the parasitic loss from a blower. I spoke with Ultimate Racing and their kit is just waiting for tuning from either diablo or superchips to meet the needs, they can't get the tune exactly right as of yet because the current chips don't have enough features. The numbers are impressive though for 3.5psi, turbo will always make more power then a blower if done right and make better more efficient power at that
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?