anybody have experience with the parker funnel web intake?

DarkoStoj

Founding Member

Sep 4, 2002

929

13

39

Detroit

Apr 25, 2006

#1

• Apr 25, 2006

• #1

I've been tossing around the idea of throwing one on my 306. I was planning on a victor jr, but I hear that its a great intake, and for $209 polished I'm thinking of picking one up. Here is my motor combo so far.

87 306
9.35:1 comp
hyd roller camshaft
dur @.50 232/240 .607/.617 lift 112 lsa 108 ICL
WW sr. heads
demon 750 double pumper carb
150 cheater shot of nitrous.

rest of the car is setup with a manual and a 3.89 gear with detroit locker. In a light 66 mustang.

what to do?

 

C

C0V3R

Member

Feb 14, 2003

524

0

16

Australia

Apr 25, 2006

#2

• Apr 25, 2006

• #2

It gets really good reviews in all our magazines down here. Supposed to be the intake of choice on alot of clevelands. Cant speak based on personal experience.

 

brianj5600

Active Member

Sep 19, 2003

1,964

2

39

Middle TN

Apr 25, 2006

#3

• Apr 25, 2006

• #3

With huge heads and a solid roller cam that can turn 7k+ rpm, it would work great. IMO it is too much for your set up.

 

1320stang

Founding Member

Nov 13, 1998

4,329

23

89

Edmond, Oklahoma

Apr 25, 2006

#4

• Apr 25, 2006

• #4

My buddy has a Funnel Web and loves it. He went back and forth between it and the Victor Jr. and ended up deciding on it. The engine it's on is an aluminum rodded, 12.7:1 pistoned, solid rollered, Canfield headed .060" over 289, but the roller isn't that radical. He's building a 347 to put the heads and intake on. The engine used to have an Offy 360 T-ram, '69 351w heads, and a pair of 660's on it and we twisted it to 8000 every pass. I think he's turning it to 7400 now.

 

DarkoStoj

Founding Member

Sep 4, 2002

929

13

39

Detroit

Apr 25, 2006

#5

• Apr 25, 2006

• #5

my camshaft is peaking at about 6500 rpm right now and the compression is kind of low at 9.35 which is steering me away. I just want to try something new!

 

1

180 Out

Member

Jul 23, 2005

375

0

16

Apr 25, 2006

#6

• Apr 25, 2006

• #6

Does the funnelweb fit under a flat hood? They look very tall:

The Parker web site says they're 7.25" tall from base to carb pad. Mustang hoods are notoriously tight and unfriendly to high rise intakes.

 

DarkoStoj

Founding Member

Sep 4, 2002

929

13

39

Detroit

Apr 25, 2006

#7

• Apr 25, 2006

• #7

180 Out said:

Does the funnelweb fit under a flat hood? They look very tall:

The Parker web site says they're 7.25" tall from base to carb pad. Mustang hoods are notoriously tight and unfriendly to high rise intakes.

Click to expand...

I need a new hood anyway, my shelby one is toast. I know the victor jr is 4.5" tall... so yea, clearance will be tight.

 

1320stang

Founding Member

Nov 13, 1998

4,329

23

89

Edmond, Oklahoma

Apr 25, 2006

#8

• Apr 25, 2006

• #8

Kevin had to get a cowl hood for it to fit. But it's like an 8" cowl hood. I'd hoped he'd put the T-ram and 660's on there...

 

iskwezm

10 Year Member

May 24, 2005

4,159

20

79

Rowland Heights,California

Apr 25, 2006

#9

• Apr 25, 2006

• #9

my budy has one on his Falcon(stock hood), cant say it made more power then a Vic jr, but he made 475 FWHP on the dyno with it on a 347

 

brianj5600

Active Member

Sep 19, 2003

1,964

2

39

Middle TN

Apr 26, 2006

#10

• Apr 26, 2006

• #10

306 vs 347 is more than 10% displacement increase. Apples to oranges.