• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Anyone ever go from Shorties to LT and notice a diff?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aliate X
  • Start date Start date Mar 30, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Aliate X

Member
May 9, 2005
602
1
18
Rockland NY
Mar 30, 2007
#1
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #1
Yeah well I got the itch after going to the track last night and running a 13.0@106 with a 1.8 60 ft.

Its not bad for a stock TB, ignition, MAF, and injector car, I think I can do 12's just need some more practice. I was gonna save for a turbo kit but I think its better that I get my all motor setup sorted out before I go ahead and bolt a power adder on. So yeah Im gonna go through and do all the bolt ons since I have none as far as motor goes besides the hci lol.

Anyways has anyone ever noticed a diff going to LTs from shorties? Im thinkin about switching over and Im just curious if anyone has actually seen some real gains, otherwise Im not going to bother.
 

poneypower89

Now everyone in the world will know I wanna bang t
Dec 6, 2004
0
3
28
Indianapolis, Indiana
Mar 30, 2007
#2
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #2
suscribing...

had an 89gt vert show up in my JY the other day... had brand new long tubes on it.

I've got BBK Equal Length Shorites now... debating the switch-a-roo
 

88GTStreetRod

Member
Jan 5, 2004
376
1
18
USA
Mar 30, 2007
#3
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #3
I have had Long Tubes and Shorty headers on the same car. Currently run Shorty headers. I have a race prep 331 stroker motor that turns 7 grand all day long and that's where the difference was in my car. With the shorty headers, I picked up bottom end and in the 2-3k RPM range. The car falls on it's face at the 5.5-6.5K rpm range. For the driving I do, I rather have the low end power. The long tubes deffinatley sounded good and makes a difference in the exhaust note. I think you would not see much difference on a basic motor with basic bolt ons with the long tubes.
 

Dean85GT

New Member
Nov 27, 2004
502
1
0
Thorold, Ontario, Canada
Mar 30, 2007
#4
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #4
You only went 13.0!!! Im almost running that on stock heads but with alot of boltons, my combo is like the exact oppostite of yours lol. Your mph is good though. I wouldnt bother with the LTs. Start upgrading some of the other stock pieces under the hood.
 

Aliate X

Member
May 9, 2005
602
1
18
Rockland NY
Mar 30, 2007
#5
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #5
Dean85GT said:
You only went 13.0!!! Im almost running that on stock heads but with alot of boltons, my combo is like the exact oppostite of yours lol. Your mph is good though. I wouldnt bother with the LTs. Start upgrading some of the other stock pieces under the hood.
Click to expand...

yeah its running really rich right now too, still working out some bugs.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Mar 30, 2007
#6
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #6
You know my stand, but remember how big of a PITA Long Tubes are. In my eyes if you want to squeeze everything out of it, get them. There are lots of fast shorty cars, but a long tube will help some!

Hmm a 13.4 is not almost 13.0s in my eyes, its almost half a second slower, just quick math (not only that but a missed gear and Aliate would still run quicker than 13.4 (heheh ))! I was telling Aliate I went 13.0s on a bolt on car also, but nowhere near 106 mph, and he also has a lot of supporting mods left, and a tune! All that done hello mid 12s,
 

Fuzion

Member
May 24, 2005
81
0
6
Virginia
Mar 30, 2007
#7
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #7
How does the Track heat h/c/i kit run with stock maf and 19lbrs? I might be on the same boat as you while i save money for a pro-m, 24's, and tb. and btw have u passed emission with that set-up?
 

85ragtop

BTW, I like dudes.
10 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
823
475
123
NC
Mar 30, 2007
#8
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #8
I had a guy make me a set of long tubes. They definitely helped up top. I am moving this to tech, some good stuff in here.
 

Aliate X

Member
May 9, 2005
602
1
18
Rockland NY
Mar 30, 2007
#9
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #9
Fuzion said:
How does the Track heat h/c/i kit run with stock maf and 19lbrs? I might be on the same boat as you while i save money for a pro-m, 24's, and tb. and btw have u passed emission with that set-up?
Click to expand...

well its running rich really heh. Thats with a 255lph pump and AFPR, I think one of my O2 sensors may be bad though.
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Mar 30, 2007
#10
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #10
I switched from 1 5/8 shortie headers to 1 3/4 BBK long tubes. i feel that i gained more TQ and top end with the long tubes. perhaps the shorties were too small primary wise for my setup too though!
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Mar 30, 2007
#11
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #11
when I comes right down to it on mildly modded stangs the LT don't give you any more then the shorty's will.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Mar 30, 2007
#12
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #12
Mine saw a big difference, but I have been told it isnt normal. I look at this, they ban LTs from some of the slower race classes for a reason!
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Mar 30, 2007
#13
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #13
86bluecobra said:
when I comes right down to it on mildly modded stangs the LT don't give you any more then the shorty's will.
Click to expand...

in terms of HP or TQ? there have been dyno studies done where the longtubes will only make 2-3more HP, but make like 30ft/tq or better throughout the RPM range.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Mar 30, 2007
#14
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #14
25thmustang said:
Mine saw a big difference, but I have been told it isnt normal. I look at this, they ban LTs from some of the slower race classes for a reason!
Click to expand...

what is a big difference? a tenth?
 

ill advised

Member
Apr 29, 2003
656
10
19
West L.A.
Mar 30, 2007
#15
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #15
I went from FMS shorties to BBK 1 5/8 LTs. I didn't notice a difference...other than a hotter cabin.
 

Dean85GT

New Member
Nov 27, 2004
502
1
0
Thorold, Ontario, Canada
Mar 30, 2007
#16
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #16
25thmustang said:
You know my stand, but remember how big of a PITA Long Tubes are. In my eyes if you want to squeeze everything out of it, get them. There are lots of fast shorty cars, but a long tube will help some!

Hmm a 13.4 is not almost 13.0s in my eyes, its almost half a second slower, just quick math (not only that but a missed gear and Aliate would still run quicker than 13.4 (heheh ))! I was telling Aliate I went 13.0s on a bolt on car also, but nowhere near 106 mph, and he also has a lot of supporting mods left, and a tune! All that done hello mid 12s,
Click to expand...

Sorry I never clarified. Thats a pretty old number, I have changed and added lots since then, except heads
 

Fett

New Member
Nov 2, 2004
766
6
0
Mar 30, 2007
#17
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #17
Running rich on a stock MAFS and 19lbs with that upper kit? I wouldn't have expected that. How do you know you are running rich, just by the smell or did you dyno it with a WBo2? Just curious.

Also, are you running out of gear as you go through the traps? You have 4.1 gears, and with a 1.8 60ft, I assume you are running slicks. How tall are they?
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Mar 30, 2007
#18
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #18
86bluecobra said:
what is a big difference? a tenth?
Click to expand...

went from a 13.8 @ 98 with Mac Shorties and a catted Mac Hpipe

to

a 13.2 @ 101 with Mac LTs, a prochamber and some pulleys.

Same tires, same weight, same track, very very similar conditions and I had nearly zero driving time between the mods to actually get better! Like I said not normal but it DID happen to me!
 
D

Dave2000GT

Active Member
Oct 3, 2005
229
26
39
Seattle
Mar 30, 2007
#19
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #19
Dean85GT said:
You only went 13.0!!! Im almost running that on stock heads but with alot of boltons, my combo is like the exact oppostite of yours lol. Your mph is good though. I wouldnt bother with the LTs. Start upgrading some of the other stock pieces under the hood.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't consider a 13.4 to be "almost" a 13.0
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Mar 30, 2007
#20
  • Mar 30, 2007
  • #20
I had old rusty Mac 1 5/8 shorties with one part of the H-pipe smashed nearly 50%.

I then added new BBK longtubes, matching H pipe (not dented), brand new 306 bottomend, performer intake port matched to AFR 165's. Same timing, fuel pressure.

I gained a total of 1.3mph.

I do not attribute the majority of those gains to the longtubes.

They do sound better though.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
196
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
Old H/c/i Installation Explanation And Pics
  • FastDriver
  • Jan 26, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 27, 2018
FastDriver
J
New guy on the block....
  • juiced90Hatch
  • Aug 31, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
695
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 2, 2011
juiced90Hatch
J
slow mustang
  • tjmaxx
  • Jun 22, 2009
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2009
LI98GTStang
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?