• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Anyone reloacted their upper A arms?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stephen4785
  • Start date Start date Jul 4, 2004

stephen4785

New Member
Dec 14, 2003
321
0
0
Fort Worth Texas
Jul 4, 2004
#1
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #1
I was day dreaming in a classic Mustang catalog last night and I came across this article about how Carrol Shelby relocated the upper a arms for better handling.The catalog has complete instructions and a template.Will it make that much of a difference and has anyone else done this?
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Jul 4, 2004
#2
  • Jul 4, 2004
  • #2
You can find tons of info here and all over the web if you do a search on "shelby drop". It is a great modification that best of all is free except for some time and effort. It is best to do it when you are replacing the front suspension and adding heavier front coils.
 

2bav8

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1998
2,511
1
47
Mesa, AZ
Jul 5, 2004
#3
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #3
I've done it, and I highly recomend the mod.
The rumors are true, even after 30+ years
 
P

paintballtommy

Member
Jan 31, 2004
244
0
16
concord, ca
Jul 5, 2004
#4
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #4
one thing man... doooooo iiiiitttt
 

mfp4073

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2001
387
0
38
Hells Ditch, FL
Jul 5, 2004
#5
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #5
Every time someone posts a "what was your favorite mod" post I have to list the shelby arm relocation. It is time and just a little money for a realignment. But the overall gain is better than anything else I have done for the cost. Basically what it does it make the top of the tires lean inward toward the center of the car during cornering. Really makes the handling different. Why ford didnt make this standard I will never understand.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Jul 5, 2004
#6
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #6
I relocated my UCAs and I love the change! My '70 handles great! Plus I didn't really like the stock nose-high stance very much. It's the only thing I've changed with my suspension so far, other than replacing the stock components.

From what I've read, I understand you can lower the mounting 1 inch and retain all the stock suspension components. I lowered mine 2 inches, which requires changing the angle of the ball joint so that it doesn't bind and break during suspension movement.

http://www.pro-motorsports.com/art-loweringlowdown.asp

There's some info on the modification. Pro-motorsports also sells a shim to use when relocating your upper control arm more than 1". I was too cheap to buy it so I made mine. Some people also modify the control arms to fix this problem. It seems like a better solution to me if your welding skills are top notch.

Also, I've read in a couple places a recommendation to align the car to different specs than stock (this is after completing the Shelby drop).
1/16" to 1/8" toe in (this came to 0.14 to 0.29 degrees toe in with my 24.75" diameter tires)
1 to 3 degrees caster
0 degrees camber
This is how I had my car aligned and it works great for me.

You can buy a metal template to help you drill the new mounting holes for the UCA. I had two made from 10 gage steel. They also provide some reinforcement for the shock tower. There's a web site with a pdf of the template available, but I don't have it saved. Do a search on this site for Shelby drop and I'm sure you'll find it.

Good luck.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Jul 5, 2004
#7
  • Jul 5, 2004
  • #7
mfp4073 said:
Every time someone posts a "what was your favorite mod" post I have to list the shelby arm relocation. It is time and just a little money for a realignment. But the overall gain is better than anything else I have done for the cost. Basically what it does it make the top of the tires lean inward toward the center of the car during cornering. Really makes the handling different. Why ford didnt make this standard I will never understand.
Click to expand...
What I've read - and it makes sense to me - is that Ford sets up cars to understeer. This means that as the car reaches the limits of traction, the front end will just slide toward the outside of the corner. This is good for many drivers in several ways. One, the sliding scrubs off speed quickly and slows the car. Two, the natural reaction to understeer is to just turn the steering wheel a little more, which works perfectly. So novice drivers are less likely to get themselves in trouble with a car set up to understeer.

The best set up for performance is a neutral set up where the fronts and the rears let go at the same time. However, this is not recommended for your grandma! Reacting quickly and correctly to oversteer is not natural, it has to be learned.

So, I think the answer is that it's a safety feature for the masses. Very lucky for us it's not too difficult to fix!
 

RGS0907

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
429
1
0
New Jersey
Jul 8, 2004
#8
  • Jul 8, 2004
  • #8
I never tried the drop on my 1970, I heard that it isn't as neccessary on the later '60's models... Also, what about the bind on the ball joints?
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Jul 9, 2004
#9
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #9
RGS0907 said:
I never tried the drop on my 1970, I heard that it isn't as neccessary on the later '60's models... Also, what about the bind on the ball joints?
Click to expand...
Read my post. It's up a couple. The drop worked great on my '70 and I highly recommend it.
 
B

blandq

Founding Member
Jun 10, 2002
146
0
16
Houston Texas
Jul 9, 2004
#10
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #10
I have done the mod but am not complete with restoration. But watch out for rubbing of the upper a-arm bolts with long tube headers...it's REAL close! (early '65 coupe)
 

Grt_Ape

New Member
Jul 1, 2004
10
0
0
Central CA
Jul 9, 2004
#11
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #11
Other than a little time and effort on the install, this is a great mod to help out handling. Check out the pro-motorsports thread posted by Hack a few replies above, their negative wedge kit has everything you need.
 

65 fastback

Founding Member
Mar 17, 2002
1,347
0
37
Northern VA
Jul 9, 2004
#12
  • Jul 9, 2004
  • #12
Come on man, everyone's doing it.

Tim
 

RGS0907

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
429
1
0
New Jersey
Jul 10, 2004
#13
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #13
Hack said:
Read my post. It's up a couple. The drop worked great on my '70 and I highly recommend it.
Click to expand...

OK.. I'll have to try it. The car handles great as it is, especially with the newer tires, I'm always greedy for a little more.
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Jul 10, 2004
#14
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #14
Hack said:
Also, I've read in a couple places a recommendation to align the car to different specs than stock (this is after completing the Shelby drop).
1/16" to 1/8" toe in (this came to 0.14 to 0.29 degrees toe in with my 24.75" diameter tires)
1 to 3 degrees caster
0 degrees camber
This is how I had my car aligned and it works great for me.

Good luck.
Click to expand...

Not too sure about the 70's but a little more neg. camber helped quite a bit on my 65. Toward the higher side on the caster as well. Even with the 1" drop there is potential for bind so the neg. wedge kit is a great soloution and the absolute best mod for the buck.

Make sure to measure the distances before punching any holes due to printer differnces.

http://www.mustangdepot.com/graphics/up-cnt-temp.pdf
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Jul 10, 2004
#15
  • Jul 10, 2004
  • #15
RGS0907 said:
OK.. I'll have to try it. The car handles great as it is, especially with the newer tires, I'm always greedy for a little more.
Click to expand...

If you have a Shelby GT500, would it not already be dropped?
 
V

VictorII

New Member
Jun 19, 2004
148
1
0
Cotati, CA
Jul 11, 2004
#16
  • Jul 11, 2004
  • #16
I have the Pro Motorsports kit waiting to go in when I do the front end on my '65 convert. But in the mean time I put adjustable anti-sway bars on the car and it nearly stopped the body roll altogether, especially the rear. Without roll, you won't get understeer. Best of all, it can be done farily quickly. I use Stam Bars. They are pricey now but worth it. And if you want to drop the front a little, buy some of the $10.00 coil spring clamps. I've had a set in use for almost 200,000 miles without a problem. When I do the front end, I'll do the 1.75" drop that the kit is set up for but for now it is all good to go.
 

RGS0907

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
429
1
0
New Jersey
Jul 12, 2004
#17
  • Jul 12, 2004
  • #17
Route666 said:
If you have a Shelby GT500, would it not already be dropped?
Click to expand...

No, the mods were only made on the 1965's, and I'm pretty sure that they stopped it somewhere in the 1966 run.
 
T

TT670

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2001
360
9
28
Jul 12, 2004
#18
  • Jul 12, 2004
  • #18
all 65 shelbys and the first 252 '66's had the arms dropped.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Jul 12, 2004
#19
  • Jul 12, 2004
  • #19
Ahhh righto then!
 
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Jul 12, 2004
#20
  • Jul 12, 2004
  • #20
In 71 the drop became "standard". Actually from what I have read the steering got redesigned so it was not needed. But all 64.5 - 70s can benefit from it...if you are looking for performance steering.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
868
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
S
what would you do? sell the project and buy completed or finish project?
  • STANG32
  • Feb 8, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
592
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 16, 2025
rusty428cj
1986 Mustang GT car cannot idle and runs at 200rpm for a couple seconds.
  • BigSlappy
  • Jun 3, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 11, 2024
AeroCoupe
Engine No start issue AGAIN!
  • ucnhtmenow1
  • Sep 1, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
919
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 11, 2024
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?