• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

are long tubes headers hard to put on?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustanghunter50
  • Start date Start date Jun 29, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
D

dwhiskie

New Member
Sep 18, 2004
183
0
0
Jun 30, 2006
#21
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #21
I have bbk lt and had to lift the engine to get them to fit. It was easy though and worth it.
 

_jb_

New Member
Mar 4, 2004
808
0
0
Michigan, Berrien County
Jun 30, 2006
#22
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #22
If I remember right, I had to use a jack to lift the engine for the passenger header.
 
9

90lxboost'n

Member
Jan 1, 2006
55
0
6
Ohio
Jun 30, 2006
#23
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #23
I just installed my BBK 1 3/4 in. LT and I had to raise pass. side about 4 inches and it slid right in. I tried to do it not raising the motor and it was NOT going to happen. Drivers side I had to remove the steering shaft and it went in without raising the motor.
 

mustanghunter50

New Member
May 30, 2006
123
0
0
easton pa
Jun 30, 2006
#24
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #24
will it matter any different that these are going on a convertible? will it make the job any different?
 
D

DaveB

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
637
0
0
Middlesex and Pomona, NJ
Jun 30, 2006
#25
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #25
mustanghunter50 said:
will it matter any different that these are going on a convertible? will it make the job any different?
Click to expand...


Yes it will unfortunately, the driver's side collector will be resting on the convertible x-brace. I had to have my mechanic reweld mine to clear it. Wish I had known before-hand to plan it out.

Edit-I dont know what years your is, but on the SN95s its a problem.
 

_jb_

New Member
Mar 4, 2004
808
0
0
Michigan, Berrien County
Jun 30, 2006
#26
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #26
mustanghunter50 said:
will it matter any different that these are going on a convertible? will it make the job any different?
Click to expand...

I didn't have to do any fabricating.
 

mustanghunter50

New Member
May 30, 2006
123
0
0
easton pa
Jun 30, 2006
#27
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #27
ok- good- mines an 87 so it should be like jb's 88- did u have to lift the engine out to do it on the vert?
 
8

89SaleenGT

New Member
Dec 24, 2003
32
0
0
Jun 30, 2006
#28
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #28
I have installed quite a few sets of Lt's in many different year cars. As for your 87:

You will have to lift the engine on the passenger side.

On 1990 and up vehicles, I have not had to lift the engine as the strut towers are in a different position.

you do have to raise the entire vehicle a fair amount to enable you to maneuver the header under the car.

Watch the cable routing near the header. you may also want to swap in a small high torque starter at this time. I have found the stock start to ride close enough to the LT's to cause heat soak problems. (Failure to crank engine when hot)

Just a few things to look for. I'm sure I forgot some...

LT's make a BIG difference on how the engine runs.
 

mustanghunter50

New Member
May 30, 2006
123
0
0
easton pa
Jun 30, 2006
#29
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #29
big difference in how it runs how? in general or in power
 

mustanghunter50

New Member
May 30, 2006
123
0
0
easton pa
Jun 30, 2006
#30
  • Jun 30, 2006
  • #30
would something like this be ok as far as a mini high torque starter http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/NEW-...hZ019QQitemZ8030170829QQrdZ1QQsspagenameZWD1V
 

_jb_

New Member
Mar 4, 2004
808
0
0
Michigan, Berrien County
Jul 3, 2006
#31
  • Jul 3, 2006
  • #31
I had no problem with an autozone starter. If they fail, you can just take them back.

I only had to lift the engine about an inch and it slid right in.

As for performance, I really did not notice any difference.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 3, 2006
#32
  • Jul 3, 2006
  • #32
donsbad - What year is your car?

You will need to lift the engine a bit, especially if you don't plan on scrathing parts or your headers.

I have had both shorties and longtubes. I would keep the shorties, unless you want every single bit of power you can get...it isn't worth the price tag IMO.
 

mustanghunter50

New Member
May 30, 2006
123
0
0
easton pa
Jul 3, 2006
#33
  • Jul 3, 2006
  • #33
i had shorties and they sucked- plus i only paid 150 for the headers and a bbk x pipe so i figured they were worth the money either way
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 4, 2006
#34
  • Jul 4, 2006
  • #34
mustanghunter - Why did they "suck"? What brand? Used?
 

mustanghunter50

New Member
May 30, 2006
123
0
0
easton pa
Jul 4, 2006
#35
  • Jul 4, 2006
  • #35
they were heddman shorties unequal, i barely noticed any difference. the fact that my motor had seen better days may had also played a role in that
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

BBK Long Tube Headers Rusting
  • 93gtmustang
  • Jun 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
230
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 27, 2026
revhead347
J
4 bank eliminator chip
  • JJ's90fox
  • Feb 17, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
139
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2026
AeroCoupe
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
L
New here from Maine
  • lobster
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
548
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 5, 2026
lobster
L
Engine Crankcase vent tube “relocation”?
  • Mcmahst
  • Nov 20, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
616
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2025
manicmechanic007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?