• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Are these 4.6l V8s good engines?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 999cm999
  • Start date Start date May 27, 2011
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
D

Deleted member 38176

Jun 1, 2011
#41
  • Jun 1, 2011
  • #41
bigkeeko said:
The complete catalog of cars: automobile-catalog.com - compare cars
Click to expand...

That site is pretty darn cool
 

KBExperience

Active Member
Jun 21, 2009
466
1
49
Houston
Jun 1, 2011
#42
  • Jun 1, 2011
  • #42
LarsD said:
New Edge > Fox = SN95
Click to expand...

I've never been any good at algebra
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jun 1, 2011
#43
  • Jun 1, 2011
  • #43
JymboSlice said:
To answer your question: Are these 4.6l 2v engines good? Stock, no.
Click to expand...

Sorry...but in comparison to what? By that same logic, the 302ci V8 found in the last pushrod powered Mustangs weren't any good in stock trim either?

I think good is a very general term. Good meaning powerful? Good meaning mod friendly? Good meaning reliable? For starters, they boast 35hp and more torque over the larger V8 they replaced (281ci vs 302ci). They accept and respond to all of the same modifications the 5.0L HO's did. They get better fuel economy in general, they run smoother and produce lower emmisions and they'll clock well over 200K.....in some cases 300K before needing a rebuild.

That' makes them as good as any 5.0L OHV I've seen.
 
B

bigkeeko

New Member
Sep 22, 2010
63
0
0
Scotland
Jun 8, 2011
#44
  • Jun 8, 2011
  • #44
Gearbanger 101 said:
Sorry...but in comparison to what? By that same logic, the 302ci V8 found in the last pushrod powered Mustangs weren't any good in stock trim either?

I think good is a very general term. Good meaning powerful? Good meaning mod friendly? Good meaning reliable? For starters, they boast 35hp and more torque over the larger V8 they replaced (281ci vs 302ci). They accept and respond to all of the same modifications the 5.0L HO's did. They get better fuel economy in general, they run smoother and produce lower emmisions and they'll clock well over 200K.....in some cases 300K before needing a rebuild.

That' makes them as good as any 5.0L OHV I've seen.
Click to expand...

Can`t argue with that.
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jun 13, 2011
#45
  • Jun 13, 2011
  • #45
good engine, reliable engine, beats the 5.0. thats all you need to know.

you can make any car fast if you want to dump money into it! not something id tell you to do though
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Jun 14, 2011
#46
  • Jun 14, 2011
  • #46
my buddies 99 ran 13.80's with just a x pipe and good tires it hot Florida weather
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
429
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
A
Carb swap question
  • AA wALtZ
  • Jul 27, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 8, 2024
General karthief
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
772
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
922
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?