• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

at what ci does a block become "big"

  • Thread starter Thread starter 90lxwhite
  • Start date Start date Feb 12, 2013
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

88LX5.Oh

15 Year Member
Dec 30, 2011
1,442
204
94
Arkansas
Feb 12, 2013
#21
  • Feb 12, 2013
  • #21
What Gearhead was saying is that displacement IS cubic inches. The displacement of an engine is measured in cubic inches (or also liters)
 

93project

Active Member
Apr 21, 2009
549
52
38
El Paso, tx
Feb 12, 2013
#22
  • Feb 12, 2013
  • #22
gearheadboy said:
So a 396, 366, 350, etc are not big blocks I guess.
Click to expand...
Well, to me anyway.. I've always thought of big blocks as 400 up, 429, 454, etc.. Aren't most 396, 366 stroked 351's? I'm not sure
 
M

MikeySmikey

New Member
Dec 6, 2012
20
0
2
Missouri
Feb 12, 2013
#23
  • Feb 12, 2013
  • #23
Something I always urge people to consider before looking at displacement or big/small block is what they want out of their engine. Small blocks do some things better than big blocks and visa versa. It's all about goals and objectives.

For me, give me a Cleveland, let me update the oiling system and slap on a pair of quench Aussie heads and I'm a happy camper.
 

f8tlfiveo

My wife likes my spool and blow-off valve.
Aug 8, 2007
1,585
102
64
Lancaster, PA
Feb 13, 2013
#24
  • Feb 13, 2013
  • #24
gearheadboy said:
"They don't base a SBC or BBC off of CI, but they base it off of displacement." WHAT? REALLY? cid= Cubic inch displacement. Its the same thing.
Click to expand...
Yeah I was thinking the same thing..
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Feb 13, 2013
#25
  • Feb 13, 2013
  • #25
My .02?
It's an old adage. Used back in the day when there were displacement limitations because of block architecture.
Big blocks were just big assed chunks of cast iron that could displace whatever their external dimensional limitations allowed based on what internal bore/stroke combination was applied. I.e. a 352 became a 360, became a 390, became a 427, became a 428. (and if you were crafty back in the day, a 428 crank used w/ a 427 bore, became a 454.) Regardless of the displacement though, every one of the c.i.'s listed above all lived w/i the confines of the same block architecture.

Just think of it as a big box built extra large so as to accomodate multiple purpose design intentions.

It was really always a Chevrolet coined phrase anyway, when the 396 showed up in the middle 60's, they needed a new catchy way to differentiate the standard boring little turd from the new bigger one.

Modern strokers have dispelled any rule of it being a size thing based on displacement, as it is now possible to get up to 490+ inches in a SBC, and what? 460 out of a aftermarket Windsor SMALL block?
 
Reactions: stangboy

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Feb 13, 2013
#26
  • Feb 13, 2013
  • #26
93project said:
Well, to me anyway.. I've always thought of big blocks as 400 up, 429, 454, etc.. Aren't most 396, 366 stroked 351's? I'm not sure
Click to expand...
so whats the 450" motor in the race car?
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Feb 13, 2013
#27
  • Feb 13, 2013
  • #27
hm I thought it'd be more cut and dry than this
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Feb 13, 2013
#28
  • Feb 13, 2013
  • #28
90lxwhite said:
hm I thought it'd be more cut and dry than this
Click to expand...
nope... you can make "big block" inches in a small block pretty easy these days.

you can make a 461" small block ford with a 4.157 bore and a 4.25 stroke

ford made a 460" "big block" also
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Feb 13, 2013
#29
  • Feb 13, 2013
  • #29
MikeySmikey said:
Something I always urge people to consider before looking at displacement or big/small block is what they want out of their engine. Small blocks do some things better than big blocks and visa versa. It's all about goals and objectives.
Click to expand...
could you give an example?
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Feb 13, 2013
#30
  • Feb 13, 2013
  • #30
Semantics. /thread
 
Reactions: Mintsick

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 13, 2013
#31
  • Feb 13, 2013
  • #31
Cubic inches have nothing to do with it. If anything the term "big block" more likely came from the family that an engine belongs to. Ford produced the 335 series FE big blocks that started at a mere 332ci big block. That engine family went on to be further bored and stroked to 352, 360, 361, 390, 406, 410, 427 and 428 before it was replaced by the 385 series FE engines which also came in 370, 429 and 460 versions, but I believe was also even manufactured in a 351ci version but wasn't used in a production vehicle (could be wrong though). These days the term is pretty much a marketing tool right along side "hemi", since we've seen small engines with big cubic inches and hemispherical combustion chambers more times than we could count since the two terms were coined.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Feb 13, 2013
#32
  • Feb 13, 2013
  • #32
SO ask yourself, is the DOHC 4.6, which is physically larger than a BBF, technically a big block? LOL!
 
Reactions: 90lxcoupe

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 13, 2013
#33
  • Feb 13, 2013
  • #33
NIKwoaC said:
SO ask yourself, is the DOHC 4.6, which is physically larger than a BBF, technically a big block? LOL!
Click to expand...

That's exactly my point. It's just as big as many big blocks but is only 281 cubes. I'm not familiar with the physical size of some of these 6+ liter engines out these days but I would assume they're not much bigger than a mod motor.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Feb 14, 2013
#34
  • Feb 14, 2013
  • #34
 

Attachments

  • ford-engine-comparison-overlay.webp
    26.9 KB · Views: 170
  • ford-engine-comparison-overlay.webp
    26.9 KB · Views: 206
Reactions: srtthis

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Feb 14, 2013
#35
  • Feb 14, 2013
  • #35
NIKwoaC said:
Click to expand...

thats pretty cool! never knew the 9.5 deck windsor was that close to the FE motor height wise. but the FE is much wider.
 

Attachments

  • ford-engine-comparison-overlay.webp
    26.9 KB · Views: 202
  • ford-engine-comparison-overlay.webp
    26.9 KB · Views: 189

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Feb 14, 2013
#36
  • Feb 14, 2013
  • #36
srtthis said:
thats pretty cool! never knew the 9.5 deck windsor was that close to the FE motor height wise. but the FE is much wider.
Click to expand...

I do not know exactly how accurate that is, and I have no idea if the mod is supposed to be 4.6, 5.4, SOHC or DOHC. Anyway, I saw it before on another site and thought it was interesting.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,062
21,225
234
Box behind Walmart
Feb 14, 2013
#37
  • Feb 14, 2013
  • #37
Back in the day, folks said BIG BLOCK or SMALL BLOCK to differentiate the physical characteristics of the engine you were using. Not internal characteristics but EXTERNAL. So folks were on the same page as to what cross member, bell housing, exhaust, etc., that was needed to mate up to the engine block. It had nothing at all to do with internal displacement... and then there were mid-blocks.
 
Reactions: stangboy

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,962
2,922
194
Middle of Maine
Feb 14, 2013
#38
  • Feb 14, 2013
  • #38
gearheadboy said:
Once again, that has 0 to do with big block or small block. And if every small block had a 3.5" stroke and a 4" bore, they would all be 350's. Well, depending on the rod.
Click to expand...

This must be cleared up............the length of the connecting rod has NOTHING to do with displacement, period. ONLY bore and stroke make up the differences in displacement. Rod length only effects relative piston speed and dwell time of the piston at TDC and BDC. I can make a long rod 302 by moving the piston pin closer to the top of the piston, and I can make a 302 with a short rod by moving the piston pin further down from the top of the piston. In both cases, the 4" bore and 3" stroke determine that it is indeed a 302 cid engine.
 
Reactions: 88LX5.Oh

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Feb 14, 2013
#39
  • Feb 14, 2013
  • #39
is are this thread really good at win
 

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Feb 14, 2013
#40
  • Feb 14, 2013
  • #40
rod lenth...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Inline 6 wanted 200 ci
  • Capnkev
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Want to Buy
Replies
2
Views
201
Want to Buy Thursday at 8:20 AM
Capnkev
C
Fox Block Decode
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jun 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
75
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Weber Carburetor tuning help
  • SchwarzStock
  • Jul 6, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
69
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Yesterday at 9:40 AM
SchwarzStock
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
729
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
C
Flat tappet to roller lifters--older block
  • chazmanaz
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
236
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 27, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?