• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Autolite 4100

  • Thread starter Thread starter wild70stang
  • Start date Start date Jan 4, 2008

wild70stang

New Member
Nov 11, 2005
317
0
0
Jan 4, 2008
#1
  • Jan 4, 2008
  • #1
I have realized that there is such a thing as too big of a carburetor lol, so I have been looking into buying a lower cfm carb to fit my 302 small block with ford 4bbl intake. I like what I have read from this website and others, but I have found that the 480 cfm models arnt equipt with a tranny kickdown since I have an automatic in my car. Does anyone know of any autolites with a tranny kickdown??? If you do I would like the code so I could possibly order one. Also I know im going to get better gas mileage with a 480 vs my currrent Carter AFB 625 cfm.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 4, 2008
#2
  • Jan 4, 2008
  • #2
find one from a mid 60's tbird with the 390. the cfm is the same as is the jetting oddly enough.
 
H

htwheelz67

Member
May 18, 2007
444
0
16
mission viejo ca.
Jan 4, 2008
#3
  • Jan 4, 2008
  • #3
you can also buy a smaller road demon or speed demon carb with annular venturi's, that is what makes the 4100 so good is the annular venturies.
 
B

Blu-Steel

Member
Dec 29, 2006
92
0
7
Waynesville, MO
Jan 7, 2008
#4
  • Jan 7, 2008
  • #4
You can install a Ford kickdown on an Autolite 4100. It's a really good carb and I run one on my 66, but mine is a manual. Contact ponycarburetors and they can give you some tips. I bought mine from ebay and got a good deal on it and am very happy with it. FOr simplicity and reliability the 4100 is hard to beat.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 7, 2008
#5
  • Jan 7, 2008
  • #5
Well I normally don't recommend Carters (or Edelbrocks) but a 625 cfm Carter isn't too much carb. Maybe you just need it tuned better.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Jan 7, 2008
#6
  • Jan 7, 2008
  • #6
the 4100 from a 67 mustang, flacon, fairlane, etc, with a 289 and auto trans will be the 480 cfm version with the auto kickdown. i have to agree though that the 625 carter is probably not too much carb for a 302, it's probably on the high side of what will wrok best but it shouldn't be too much carb.
 
B

Blu-Steel

Member
Dec 29, 2006
92
0
7
Waynesville, MO
Jan 8, 2008
#7
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #7
Depending on how your engine is set up 625 cfm may or may not be too much. The key is Volumetric Efficiency and your engine RPM range. If you are running a high RPM setup (cam, heads, intake) then 625 would be about right, but if you are running a street setup and the engine sees duty under about 6000 RPM, the 480 cfm would be about right.
I pulled this off of pony carburetor’s web site, (http://www.ponycarburetors.com/default.asp?page=calculatingcfm) but you can find this formula in most good automotive publications and catalogs (it’s also on in the back of Edelbrock’s catalog for example).

"Calculating CFM

Actual Air/Fuel Mixture Intake = Volumetric Efficiency
Theoretical Air/Fuel Mixture

Engine/Carburetor Sizing Relationship

The larger the engine, the more air it's capable of "gulping". In math terms, it looks like this:

Cubic In. Displacement/2 X Maximum RPM/1728 = Maximum CFM

An Example:

289 Cubic Inches/2 x 8000 RPM/1728 = 669 CFM

This is still not the final answer for sizing a carburetor. The volumetric efficiency must be taken into consideration.

In our example a 289 @ 8000 RPM can use 669 CFM
however
660 CFM x .90 volumetric efficiency = 602 CFM
669 CFM x .85 volumetric efficiency = 568 CFM

Our example is based on a Hi-Po 289. Ford installed a 600 CFM Autolite 4100 on this engine. Did Ford engineers know what they were doing? You Bet!
A standard "A" code or "D" code 289 4 barrel with the factory valve train will not run much above 6000 RPM.
6000 RPM requires 501 CFM x .85 volumetric efficiency = 426 CFM. Ford installed a 480 CFM carburetor!"

For a 302 with max RPM of 6000 the numbers work out like this:
.90 VE = 471 cfm
.85 VE = 446 cfm

Hope this helps.
 
H

htwheelz67

Member
May 18, 2007
444
0
16
mission viejo ca.
Jan 8, 2008
#8
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #8
carters and edelbrocks usually give great mileage as do some demons, I think if a carb is tuned to a proper A/F ratio if your using a 500 or 600 cfm isn't going to matter as much as the engine combination, state of tune and overall engine condition.

One of the best options to get better mileage fuel system wise is install efi, even the old holley analog projection systems which bolt on any 4bbl aftermarket intake, when I first tried one (analog) I picked up about 20 hp and TQ and my mileage went up 4 mpg's.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jan 9, 2008
#9
  • Jan 9, 2008
  • #9
Blu-Steel said:
Depending on how your engine is set up 625 cfm may or may not be too much. The key is Volumetric Efficiency and your engine RPM range. If you are running a high RPM setup (cam, heads, intake) then 625 would be about right, but if you are running a street setup and the engine sees duty under about 6000 RPM, the 480 cfm would be about right.
I pulled this off of pony carburetor’s web site, (http://www.ponycarburetors.com/default.asp?page=calculatingcfm) but you can find this formula in most good automotive publications and catalogs (it’s also on in the back of Edelbrock’s catalog for example).

"Calculating CFM

Actual Air/Fuel Mixture Intake = Volumetric Efficiency
Theoretical Air/Fuel Mixture

Engine/Carburetor Sizing Relationship

The larger the engine, the more air it's capable of "gulping". In math terms, it looks like this:

Cubic In. Displacement/2 X Maximum RPM/1728 = Maximum CFM

An Example:

289 Cubic Inches/2 x 8000 RPM/1728 = 669 CFM

This is still not the final answer for sizing a carburetor. The volumetric efficiency must be taken into consideration.

In our example a 289 @ 8000 RPM can use 669 CFM
however
660 CFM x .90 volumetric efficiency = 602 CFM
669 CFM x .85 volumetric efficiency = 568 CFM

Our example is based on a Hi-Po 289. Ford installed a 600 CFM Autolite 4100 on this engine. Did Ford engineers know what they were doing? You Bet!
A standard "A" code or "D" code 289 4 barrel with the factory valve train will not run much above 6000 RPM.
6000 RPM requires 501 CFM x .85 volumetric efficiency = 426 CFM. Ford installed a 480 CFM carburetor!"

For a 302 with max RPM of 6000 the numbers work out like this:
.90 VE = 471 cfm
.85 VE = 446 cfm

Hope this helps.
Click to expand...
Only problem with all that and the formula is, it has no correlation with the actual engine operation or the cfm rating of carbs. It's just a formula for picking a carb size, nothing else. For a Holley carb to flow 600 cfms, at WOT, it will have to exert a 1-1/2" hg pull on the bottom of the carb at WOT. Putting a different size engine or different engine build under it changes everything. I don't know what vacuum pull the Carter's were rated with, but I've heard they tend to be smaller carbs than a similarly sized Holley.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
1974 Datsun 620 pickup / 5.0L HO
  • RJH46
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
1
Views
200
Other Auto Tech Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
668
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?