• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Automatics vs. Manuals

  • Thread starter Thread starter TJMAudio
  • Start date Start date Dec 11, 2004

Automatic vs. Manual

  • Automatic

    Votes: 36 35.0%
  • Manual

    Votes: 67 65.0%

  • Total voters
    103
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
T

TJMAudio

New Member
Dec 11, 2004
6
0
0
Dec 11, 2004
#1
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #1
I was talking to my friend the other day about the 2005 Mustang I am getting in January (GT Coupe), and I am probably getting an Automatic. He called me a dumbass for it and said to get a manual, they are quicker and faster. Now, what is your input on this? From what I recall a redone Automatic is basically a manual with perfect shifts...
Please put in your opinion.
 

YellowMach69

Founding Member
Aug 5, 2002
371
0
16
buffalo new york
Dec 11, 2004
#2
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #2
i love the manual better, Plus i hope wife would drive it less
 
C

coupe302

New Member
Nov 23, 2004
23
0
0
OLD DOMINION
Dec 11, 2004
#3
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #3
I have had 5 Mustangs and only one of those was an auto.(91 LX 5.0) which I eventually converted to a five speed. Although this new auto. tranny may be a huge improvement over previous models, you can't beat the fun factor of a 5-speed Mustang.
 
Z

Zedoc

Member
Dec 10, 2004
40
0
6
Dec 11, 2004
#4
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #4
The automatic is a FIVE speed and is suposed to be excellent. In 99% of driving it will shift faster and be in the proper gear more often than the five speed. You would be a faster driver in the automatic except in an absolute drag race from 0 to top speed.
That said, I'm getting a manual just because it's more involving and gives you more feel for what the engine is doing. It's more traditional too, but the automatic is better for almost everything (but cost).
 

Scot_94GT

Founding Member
Jun 20, 2002
262
0
0
Spring Lake Park, MN
Dec 11, 2004
#5
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #5
A manual is more fun to drive. I couldn't car less about 1 or 2 tenths in the 1/4 from either type of tranny.
 
A

alan519

Banned
Dec 10, 2004
63
0
0
Dec 11, 2004
#6
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #6
depends on where you live, and how you drive

TJMAudio said:
I was talking to my friend the other day about the 2005 Mustang I am getting in January (GT Coupe), and I am probably getting an Automatic. He called me a dumbass for it and said to get a manual, they are quicker and faster. Now, what is your input on this? From what I recall a redone Automatic is basically a manual with perfect shifts...
Please put in your opinion.
Click to expand...
if you live in a congested city, and drive everyday, an automatic is the only way to go...shifting back and forth gets old real fast in congestion. If the car is only used occasionally and to have fun, then get the standard.
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Dec 11, 2004
#7
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #7
From the horse's mouth (a Ford engineer that is), MOST drivers will be faster in an auto. It will take a very good driver to be faster in the manual.

Note that M/T ran 13.6 first try with an '05 GT auto, but took them a while to beat that time with a manual. So far they've only been able to run a manual 0.1 sec faster.

Get what you think is the right trannie for you, not what your "friend" says. What kind of tranne does your friend have in his car?
 
B

bandgod

New Member
Nov 26, 2004
44
0
0
Dec 11, 2004
#8
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #8
im getting the manual becuase i had more fun, it gives you more feel to the car. its just more fun
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Dec 11, 2004
#9
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #9
bandgod said:
im getting the manual becuase i had more fun, it gives you more feel to the car. its just more fun
Click to expand...

That's great, I have a manual trannie in my 2001 GT.

But what's right for you and me may not be the best choice for the person asking the question.

So I'll say it again, get the trannie that you want not the trannie that your friend thinks you should get nor the trannie that anyone here on Stangnet has or thinks you should get.
 

66Satellite

Banned
Feb 6, 2003
649
0
17
Dec 11, 2004
#10
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #10
I haven't driven it yet but all the reviews have been going nuts about how nice the manual shifter and clutch are in the 05. Plus, it's cheaper...
 

new22003

New Member
Jun 22, 2003
657
0
0
Missouri
Dec 11, 2004
#11
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #11
Either way for me. I like a manual sometimes but an auto is sure nice.
 

66Satellite

Banned
Feb 6, 2003
649
0
17
Dec 11, 2004
#12
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #12
new22003 said:
Either way for me. I like a manual sometimes but an auto is sure nice.
Click to expand...

Yeah, when you have that much torque either is fine. It's the buzzy high reving engines where a manual is the only real choice.
 
T

TJMAudio

New Member
Dec 11, 2004
6
0
0
Dec 11, 2004
#13
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #13
Having that much torque? What does torque do to contribute to a manuel? Smoother shifts or something?
 
C

corey796

New Member
Oct 27, 2004
85
0
0
Dec 12, 2004
#14
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #14
TJMAudio said:
I was talking to my friend the other day about the 2005 Mustang I am getting in January (GT Coupe), and I am probably getting an Automatic. He called me a dumbass for it and said to get a manual, they are quicker and faster. Now, what is your input on this? From what I recall a redone Automatic is basically a manual with perfect shifts...
Please put in your opinion.
Click to expand...

your friends wrong the manual is quicker but not faster or is it faster not quicker
 
B

bandgod

New Member
Nov 26, 2004
44
0
0
Dec 12, 2004
#15
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #15
So I'll say it again, get the trannie that you want not the trannie that your friend thinks you should get nor the trannie that anyone here on Stangnet has or thinks you should get.
Click to expand...


the best advice anyone can give. get whatever you like and what will be convenient for you. people that get manuals usually get it because you just get more involved with the car gives it a more racer like feel. but definately get what works for you and what you like.
 
A

Amstung

New Member
Jan 21, 2004
11
0
0
NW Los Angeles
Dec 12, 2004
#16
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #16
I agree with alan519. I really miss the fun of a manual, but it was not fun in traffic. It was also harder to shift while my arm was in a cast.
 
H

hobbyhorse

New Member
Sep 14, 2003
29
0
1
Kinston,NC
Dec 12, 2004
#17
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #17
I haven't driven the 05, automatic or manual, but if in runs thru the gears and shifts like an auto lincoln LS it will probably be fun in a kinky sort of way.
 
1

120rir

New Member
Oct 8, 2004
52
0
0
Dec 13, 2004
#18
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #18
I agree with much of what is written above. All of my previous vehicles were manual and then we got an automatic a couple of years back....regretted it ever since. In a Mustang, it just seems like heresy to have an automatic. However, if you do a lot of stop-n-go driving an auto wouldn't be such a bad thing to have.
 

Mach428

New Member
Dec 7, 2003
321
0
0
Dec 13, 2004
#19
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #19
The diffrence between the AUTO and Manual is the drivetrain loss. Your stang In manual looses 15% of it's power through the drivetrain, an AUTO looses about 20%.

Manual RWHP 270

Auto RWHP 250
 
S

spencerod

New Member
Nov 24, 2004
1
0
0
Fort Myers, FL
Dec 13, 2004
#20
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #20
Mach428 said:
The diffrence between the AUTO and Manual is the drivetrain loss. Your stang In manual looses 15% of it's power through the drivetrain, an AUTO looses about 20%.

Manual RWHP 270

Auto RWHP 250
Click to expand...

Am I missing something? I thought the GT had 300 hp at the crank, thus therefore and always you meant 255 hp and 240 hp manual/auto respectively. Now that I am finished being a jackass I have a question. Do you know if he drivtrain loss #'s you quoted are specific to the '05 Mustang, or are you quoting generally held notions of drivetrain loss.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
257
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
C
5r55s auto to TR3650 Manual swap 4.0 V6
  • Ceskz
  • Feb 24, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech Mar 27, 2025
89ripper
Engine Information that is Needed When You Post a "Car is not Running" or "Car is Running Poorly" Thread
  • AeroCoupe
  • Apr 28, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 4, 2025
Bullitt347
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
842
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?