• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Baseline Dyno Tomorrow

  • Thread starter Thread starter Beau
  • Start date Start date Mar 12, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Mar 12, 2004
#1
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #1
I'll be doing 2 pulls on a dynojet tomorrow morning at JBA. Based on my mods (or lack thereof) would 230rwhp be too much to hope for?
 

03tbgt

New Member
Feb 28, 2004
20
0
0
tulsa,ok
Mar 12, 2004
#2
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #2
LACK of mods. you see my sig and thats all the mods i have CAI and Flows. and also in my sig you can see what i pulled. So i am going to take a very uneducated guess and say over 230????
 

my_03GT

New Member
Feb 9, 2003
186
0
0
DE
Mar 12, 2004
#3
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #3
I am going to say 240+- a couple....
 

gtrackd02

New Member
Aug 2, 2003
290
0
0
st clair shores
Mar 12, 2004
#4
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #4
my_03GT said:
I am going to say 240+- a couple....
Click to expand...

I agree......
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Mar 12, 2004
#5
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #5
230 on a dynojet is almost a give in, with your mods i have to agree with the other guys here & say high 230's - low 240's
 

Firemanz

Only you can prevent Forest Fires!
Founding Member
Dec 13, 2001
4,105
0
0
San Antonio, TX
Mar 12, 2004
#6
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #6
235 is my guess.....
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
Mar 12, 2004
#7
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #7
ooo your sig changed firemanz

the plenum/tb/FIPK should net you around 7-10 hp.. stock 2003 gt are around 225-230ish... 240 is a good number to hope for
 

gruntman31

Founding Member
Apr 22, 2002
624
0
0
Colorado Springs, Co
Mar 12, 2004
#8
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #8
235-240 RWHP. Those plenums are supposed to be pretty good mods. You're still choked up on the intake and exhuast, though, so it will limit the amount of poewr the plenum can make.
 

dkshadow

Banned
May 12, 2003
952
0
0
TEXAS
Mar 12, 2004
#9
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #9
210 rwhp
 

03trubluGT

New Member
Nov 19, 2002
1,067
0
0
Mansfield, TX
Mar 12, 2004
#10
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #10
I'd say around the high 230s.

Go with the LT instead of your "JBA Custom Exhaust with shorties"....

You won't be disappointed.

Matt
 

gruntman31

Founding Member
Apr 22, 2002
624
0
0
Colorado Springs, Co
Mar 12, 2004
#11
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #11
03trubluGT said:
I'd say around the high 230s.

Go with the LT instead of your "JBA Custom Exhaust with shorties"....

You won't be disappointed.

Matt
Click to expand...


Ditto.
 

dkshadow

Banned
May 12, 2003
952
0
0
TEXAS
Mar 12, 2004
#12
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #12
03trubluGT said:
I'd say around the high 230s.

Go with the LT instead of your "JBA Custom Exhaust with shorties"....

You won't be disappointed.

Matt
Click to expand...
He lives in California
 
C

CottonBurnerz

Banned
May 10, 2003
1,554
0
0
Drink and Drive = Teh Lose
Mar 12, 2004
#13
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #13
dkshadow said:
He lives in California
Click to expand...

That's another thing that I'd like to understand besides women...
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Mar 13, 2004
#14
  • Mar 13, 2004
  • #14
yea yea yea cali blows chunks


thanks for the replies guys, i'll post my results when i get back tomorrow
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Mar 13, 2004
#15
  • Mar 13, 2004
  • #15
Ok, I'm back with some very raw numbers.

max hp: 273.0 @ 5700 <--- Edit because I re-checked my numbers
max tq: 282.0 @ 4772
temp: 61.9F
barometer: 30.02

note: these are uncorrected #'s, so if anyone has a website I can go to in order to input them for correction, post it
 

stangman

15 Year Member
Jul 10, 2003
2,690
10
69
in a 3 bed, 2 bath
Mar 13, 2004
#16
  • Mar 13, 2004
  • #16
1990StangLX said:
Ok, I'm back with some very raw numbers.

max hp: 272.4 @ 5501
max tq: 282.0 @ 4772
temp: 61.9F
barometer: 30.02

note: these are uncorrected #'s, so if anyone has a website I can go to in order to input them for correction, post it
Click to expand...



those are some big #'s for you mods. (get ready for some flaming man )
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Mar 13, 2004
#17
  • Mar 13, 2004
  • #17
no s**t...but thats what my printouts say..it was a dyno dynamics dynamometer...



i just don't know how to do the correction factor for SAE or STD
 

Islander03GT

New Member
Jan 19, 2004
470
0
0
Simi Valley, Ca
Mar 13, 2004
#18
  • Mar 13, 2004
  • #18
i like your numbers. i hope mine are close.
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Mar 13, 2004
#19
  • Mar 13, 2004
  • #19
thanks, i was pretty pleased myself, the uncorrected numbers i was going for was about 250ish
 
3

350HPZ

New Member
Jul 18, 2003
68
0
0
Mar 13, 2004
#20
  • Mar 13, 2004
  • #20
Good numbers, seems really high,did you run air/fuel? Mine were 242Hp283 Torque SAE
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Forced Induction Total Timing under boost
  • Dontknowchit
  • Aug 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
279
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 28, 2025
Dontknowchit
P
rear Impact absorbers.
  • Praetorious
  • May 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
130
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2026
Praetorious
P
6
2010 V6 Sees differently than GT?
  • 6t9Mach1
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
148
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Apr 1, 2026
6t9Mach1
6
P
2002 T5 transmission vibration issue
  • puffoo
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
142
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Feb 22, 2026
puffoo
P
New gal in San Diego
  • Mustang Momma
  • Feb 11, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
164
The Welcome Wagon Feb 11, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?