• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

BBK SSI intake any good???

  • Thread starter Thread starter NooSlo50h
  • Start date Start date Oct 3, 2005
N

NooSlo50h

New Member
Sep 27, 2005
9
0
0
Oct 3, 2005
#1
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #1
I was thinkin about buyin the new BBK SSI intake but i havent heard anything about it, anyone think its any good or should i just go with the eddlebrock or trickflow?
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Oct 3, 2005
#2
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #2
it wont fit under stock hood
 

sldghmr

Member
Jun 30, 2003
291
0
16
Sil Sprg, MD
Oct 3, 2005
#3
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #3
It looks like it wouldn't fit under ANY hood.....would love to hear from someone who has one....
 

Redsnake2

New Member
Aug 8, 2005
374
0
0
Philly, PA
Oct 3, 2005
#4
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #4
 
C

ChrisA#5

New Member
Jan 10, 2004
60
0
0
Indianapolis
Oct 4, 2005
#5
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #5
i think its more of an intake for a blower, high rpm type motor(?) if your car is fairly stock i would stick w/ the base model edelbrock (forget model name), trick flow street, or cobra (good deals), or gt 40. and w/ those you only lose the stock strut tower brace, and dont have to change hoods, just dont use a spacer.
 

xr8d302

I bought a 27" monitor to compensate for my lack o
Apr 29, 2004
1,113
0
36
Medicine Hat, AB
Oct 4, 2005
#6
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #6
+1 for seeing this intake on a car. I think it looks A++++. Would swap hood for it!
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Oct 4, 2005
#7
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #7
There were some dyno results on the corral and in a mustang mag. It looks like its comparable to the Edelbrock RPM or a little above for rpm range.
 

Scott_95GT

New Member
Oct 8, 2004
387
0
0
Sacramento
Oct 4, 2005
#8
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #8
I've never seen one in person, but I've read about it a good amount. Like zenboy99 said, it has a higher rpm range, close to the Track Heat or RPM. Not a good choice for stock heads.
 

a50sn95

Founding Member
Oct 12, 2001
368
0
16
Elk Grove, CA
Oct 4, 2005
#9
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #9
I remember when I first heard about this intake, they (one of the mags...) said BBK was designing one for the 94-95's too.....
Haven;t seen or heard anything about this in a long time, so.....
Plus, I don't see a CARB E.O for these. Important for those of us in Cali....
 

94CobraPace

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2000
907
1
0
Houston, Tx.
Oct 4, 2005
#10
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #10
I have seen one on a motor on a engine stand.. The quality looks good. It will be used with a blower also.
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Oct 4, 2005
#11
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #11
This is it on a Fox. 5.0 Mustang did this test. They say it WILL clear a stock hood & the valve covers on a Fox. As far as the SN ..... I dunno.





 

illwood

Member
Apr 3, 2004
636
1
19
Worcester, MA
Oct 4, 2005
#12
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #12
a50sn95 said:
I remember when I first heard about this intake, they (one of the mags...) said BBK was designing one for the 94-95's too.....
Haven;t seen or heard anything about this in a long time, so.....
Plus, I don't see a CARB E.O for these. Important for those of us in Cali....
Click to expand...
I was actually on the phone with BBK tech when I asked about the CARB number for the SSI. She was very knowledgable and told me that BBK hasn't started the application process, but probably would soon. The CARB # is more of a government scheme to get more money IMO.

Also, she said that the only reason why long tube headers are not "emissions legal" is cause some bureaucrat basically decided that long tube headers were a "race" part and not because of any emissions problems
 

a50sn95

Founding Member
Oct 12, 2001
368
0
16
Elk Grove, CA
Oct 4, 2005
#13
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #13
BBK's page says no to fitting under the stock hood on SN's.
It may be a scheme to get money, but if they want to sell them here, they better get an E.O. I can't imagine doing an intake swap along with my h-pipe swap for a 30 minute smog test.
Dennis
 
H

Humpty_Dumpty

New Member
Nov 19, 2005
10
0
0
Nov 19, 2005
#14
  • Nov 19, 2005
  • #14
Hi. I have an SSI manifold on a Ford crate engine in a kit cobra. I figured at 350 horse and 2200 lbs. it should move, and I wanted the latest greatest manifold. Unfortunately, what moved was coolant through the manifold in a fissure and leaked out by the #4 cylinder manifold bolt. Also I have to mention the spacing on the fuel rails does not match the spacing on the intake ports so the injectors are not parallel, and they leaked gasoline on the intake manifold. This was after I spent 2 hours grinding casting flash out of intake runners to improve flow.

I contacted John Brockman at BBK who has been very gracious and helpful. I boxed up the manifold and fuel rails to return to BBK, but FedEx has no record of a request to pick it up for a return to BBK.

I have been trying so hard to get this car together and now I am stuck with a manifold that leaks. I have no other recourse than to sue BBK in small claims court.

- David







crapola
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Nov 19, 2005
#15
  • Nov 19, 2005
  • #15
The new 5.0 Mustang article with the BBK intake, Edelbrock RPM II, Holley, Trick Flow, GT-40 wasn't very promising. Seems like its between the RPM II and the Performer as far as RPM level.

I've had nothing but problems with BBK. I've bought from them 3 times and have had problems every time.
1.) sent me the wrong fuel pump, charged me a price that was $20 over magazine add
2.) wanted to charge me $11 to ship a $15 book
3.) sent me 94-95 ceramic headers that fit horribly. Had to do alot of work to get them to fit and it still screws up the rest of my exhaust.
 
H

Humpty_Dumpty

New Member
Nov 19, 2005
10
0
0
Nov 22, 2005
#16
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #16
Just an update:

John, Bryan and everyone at BBK continued to be concerned and extremly helpful. In the end they had been trying the best to get the manifold back and remedy the situation. It is the folks a FedEx that are incompetent. Thanks to John, Bryan and all those at BBK that stand behind their product and are helpful fixing a situation.



- David
 

xr8d302

I bought a 27" monitor to compensate for my lack o
Apr 29, 2004
1,113
0
36
Medicine Hat, AB
Nov 22, 2005
#17
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #17
Someone get this on a 94/95 with pics before I snap.
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Nov 22, 2005
#18
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #18
Humpty_Dumpty said:
Just an update:

John, Bryan and everyone at BBK continued to be concerned and extremly helpful. In the end they had been trying the best to get the manifold back and remedy the situation. It is the folks a FedEx that are incompetent. Thanks to John, Bryan and all those at BBK that stand behind their product and are helpful fixing a situation.



- David
Click to expand...

UPS all the way!!! I'm always glad to see the UPS dude (Ugly Parts Shipper).
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Nov 22, 2005
#19
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #19
as far as gains, it is on par with the GT40 intake. not as good in the upper rpm range.

the latest 5.0 mag has a comparison of intakes, the bbk is one of the ones they compared.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Y
BBK SSI Crossover tube
  • yaboity
  • May 17, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
19
Views
733
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 7, 2025
yaboity
Y
J
Engine 4.6 Running rough at half throttle
  • jake411
  • Aug 3, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
116
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 4, 2026
jake411
J
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
284
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
I
1994 Cobra - Fuel Pressure Drops Revving at Idle
  • IconicSilverGT500
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
16
Views
487
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Apr 24, 2026
Mcmahst
Engine Cleaning Intake valves with lower intake off
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
453
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 11, 2026
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?