• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Best lowering springs for street

  • Thread starter Thread starter LAZERREDGT
  • Start date Start date Feb 14, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
L

LAZERREDGT

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
254
0
0
South Texas-(Rio Grande Valley)
Feb 14, 2007
#1
  • Feb 14, 2007
  • #1
I want to lower my Mustang but I'm a little confused on what are the best springs on looks and ride quality. What are some of you guys using or what do you recomend? Wheel and tire setup are 245/50/16 on Cobra R wheels and it's a daily driver.

Thanks
 

nonglossjason

I did not have intercourse with a sheep.
Jan 27, 2006
138
20
39
Feb 14, 2007
#2
  • Feb 14, 2007
  • #2
Hey man, i was going get theeibach sportline but ened up getting the prokit and love it! it doesnt really affect the ride quality but the stance it SICK!
 

90blacknight

Member
Apr 11, 2006
136
0
18
Feb 14, 2007
#3
  • Feb 14, 2007
  • #3
Steeda springs, hands down.
 

shhak

New Member
Dec 4, 2006
109
0
0
Feb 14, 2007
#4
  • Feb 14, 2007
  • #4
I just got the Kenne Brown springs. Lowered my terminator 1.5" and ride quality was uneffected.
 

04sleeper

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2002
2,674
14
89
Dallas, TX
Feb 14, 2007
#5
  • Feb 14, 2007
  • #5
Ford "B" Springs.

They are made by Eibach but are much cheaper. $139.99 @ Jegs.com
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
Feb 14, 2007
#6
  • Feb 14, 2007
  • #6
i have the B's. I dont recommend them
 
L

LAZERREDGT

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
254
0
0
South Texas-(Rio Grande Valley)
Feb 14, 2007
#7
  • Feb 14, 2007
  • #7
04sleeper said:
Ford "B" Springs.

They are made by Eibach but are much cheaper. $139.99 @ Jegs.com
Click to expand...

Funny you mention those, I just got the new Jegs catalog today and was leaning towards "B" springs. What was the ride feel with the B springs?

I currently have 4 banger springs in the rear, and it seems that switching from the original V8 springs made no height change. Would removing the spring isolator make much difference?
 

SteedaGT9150

Advanced Member
Nov 10, 2004
1,351
59
68
Maryland
Feb 14, 2007
#8
  • Feb 14, 2007
  • #8
i have b springs and love them. i went ahead and bought new kyb shocks and struts and the ride quality was actually better
 
L

LAZERREDGT

Founding Member
Mar 19, 2002
254
0
0
South Texas-(Rio Grande Valley)
Feb 14, 2007
#9
  • Feb 14, 2007
  • #9
Anybody have these from Ebay? These are about $110.00 with shipping.


"Dozens of lowering spring manufacturers have popped up over the past few years, but none has yet to match the durability and performance of Maxspeed, at the same price. Maxspeed's new line of lowering springs combine years of performance and technology research along with style, strength, durability and of course, price. Lowering springs with the same specifications as Maxspeed, you may find for $300-$400. The ingenious financial and engineering system used by Maxspeed lowering springs allows the company to offer amazing products at prices that can't be touched by any other company in it's class. This is the true combination of beauty and brains.

Lower Approximate inches: 2.0 Front/1.8 Rear

FITS 79-04 Ford Mustang all model

Package Included:

Brand new one set of springs (4 pieces) by Maxpeed Performance (part#LS-5801"
 

Attachments

  • 79_mustang_springs_maxspeed_yellow.webp
    98.8 KB · Views: 1,003

DEFWISH

Member
Feb 25, 2006
87
0
8
Wichita, Ks
Feb 14, 2007
#10
  • Feb 14, 2007
  • #10
I have the fms "C" springs... the front's good but the back sits high as stock imo.... which pissed me off alot... sits like a dragster or sometin
 

04sleeper

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2002
2,674
14
89
Dallas, TX
Feb 15, 2007
#11
  • Feb 15, 2007
  • #11
LAZERREDGT said:
Funny you mention those, I just got the new Jegs catalog today and was leaning towards "B" springs. What was the ride feel with the B springs?

I currently have 4 banger springs in the rear, and it seems that switching from the original V8 springs made no height change. Would removing the spring isolator make much difference?
Click to expand...
I have tried both the "B" and "C" springs and prefered the "B"'s better due to the progressive rate.
I wouldn't remove the isolators myself. It won't make a whole lot of difference.

I would suggest weight jacker control arms if you want to adjust the height.
 

nonglossjason

I did not have intercourse with a sheep.
Jan 27, 2006
138
20
39
Feb 15, 2007
#12
  • Feb 15, 2007
  • #12
pro kit pro kit pro kit!
 
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
Feb 15, 2007
#13
  • Feb 15, 2007
  • #13
DEFWISH said:
I have the fms "C" springs... the front's good but the back sits high as stock imo.... which pissed me off alot... sits like a dragster or sometin
Click to expand...

same with my B's. I took out the rear isolators and all is good now. Do a search. There are a few threads with pics about the issue
 

302RollinHard

New Member
Sep 26, 2005
0
0
0
Columbus, OH
Feb 15, 2007
#14
  • Feb 15, 2007
  • #14
i would vote pro kit. Low, but not too low and the ride isn't really affected in my opinion.
 

nonglossjason

I did not have intercourse with a sheep.
Jan 27, 2006
138
20
39
Feb 15, 2007
#15
  • Feb 15, 2007
  • #15
yea its really not but handling is a bit better. I will post pics in a couple days when i get my headlights! The stance is just perfect in my opinion!
 

FSTRDNU

New Member
Aug 9, 2005
76
0
0
Feb 15, 2007
#16
  • Feb 15, 2007
  • #16
the ebay ones rock , we just put em on my buddys car, mint
 

f4fntm

New Member
Oct 10, 2004
88
2
0
Olympia, WA
Feb 16, 2007
#17
  • Feb 16, 2007
  • #17
If you want nice ride quality, God forbid you should get the Sportlines. I've got 'em on my '89: they are low and handle great, but are quite stiff.
 
Reactions: 02blackout

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 16, 2007
#18
  • Feb 16, 2007
  • #18
Eibach Pro Kit...hands down. They're worth every penny IMO. I would've gone with the Sportlines but they would've dropped the car too far and my headers would drag.
 
H

habiv

Member
Oct 28, 2004
125
1
16
Feb 16, 2007
#19
  • Feb 16, 2007
  • #19
This past summer i installed h&r sports with bilsteins on my 90 gt. The ride quality is great but I wasn't overly joyed with the height. The springs lowered the rear more than i had hoped. I ended up buying a set of rear adjustable lower control arms to rais the back to where i want it. I have pictures of the ride height prior to control arm instal if you care to see how the h&r's sit.
 

nonglossjason

I did not have intercourse with a sheep.
Jan 27, 2006
138
20
39
Feb 16, 2007
#20
  • Feb 16, 2007
  • #20
lets see it
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
314
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
Fox Alignment Suggestions
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
466
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2025
PonyGTrider
Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
F
For Sale 03 Redfire Cobra Convertible
  • FastFox5oh
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
64
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jul 14, 2026
FastFox5oh
F
28"x9" tire clearance
  • Sparky714
  • Jun 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
855
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 19, 2025
Sparky714
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?