• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Best Setup....

  • Thread starter Thread starter 11sec5ohh
  • Start date Start date Oct 16, 2007
1

11sec5ohh

New Member
Jan 7, 2004
14
0
1
Washington D.C.
Oct 16, 2007
#1
  • Oct 16, 2007
  • #1
I just purchased an 89' GT that is bone stock. I really want to build the car in to a low 11 high 10 second drag radial car while keeping it street driven. While the car will not be my daily driver I still want to build a reliable setup that I can drive everyday if needed, sit in traffic, and take to the track on Friday night and still run deep in to the 11-10 second field. I do like the aspect of an all motor monster, but I am not opposed to building a blower car either. Basically I am looking for a drop-the-hammer reliable powerplant. Any suggestions on a good setup? Any help would be appreciated.
 

samickguy15

Member
Sep 1, 2005
404
0
16
Delavan, IL
Oct 16, 2007
#2
  • Oct 16, 2007
  • #2
I would go with a stroked 351W or maybe even look at a 460 swap. I think the 351W would be the way to go.
 

87foxstang

Member
May 10, 2007
0
0
16
Cromwell, CT
Oct 16, 2007
#3
  • Oct 16, 2007
  • #3
+1 on the stroked 351
 

2Tone5.0

New Member
Oct 11, 2007
63
0
0
Philadelphia
Oct 16, 2007
#4
  • Oct 16, 2007
  • #4
a naturally aspirated 5.0 motor wont get you there. Maybe close with a good 306 kit (heads,cam, pistons) and 4.10 gears. just do full exhaust and full bolt ons with a 306 setup and you should get 11's
 
L

lvboost

New Member
Feb 19, 2007
32
0
0
mass
Oct 16, 2007
#5
  • Oct 16, 2007
  • #5
351 with victor jr and a 200 hundred shot and an automatic cheapest way to go fast
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Oct 16, 2007
#6
  • Oct 16, 2007
  • #6
Adding a power adder will help keep you more drivable. A car with a nitrous or a blower and 8- 10lbs of boost does not require near the cylinder head and camshaft a nat. aspd. motor will. And if tuned correctly will remain very reliable and safe not to mention the increased engine life due to lack of rpm's you will have to turn an all motor car all the time. (just look at NMRA Pure Street Cars)There are many different ways to build an 10-11 sec. car reliably. You just have to decide what you want to do, it all comes down to the greenbacks and what you consider streetable.
 

347strokin

New Member
Oct 2, 2007
27
0
0
Oct 16, 2007
#7
  • Oct 16, 2007
  • #7
PUNISHER RACING said:
Adding a power adder will help keep you more drivable. A car with a nitrous or a blower and 8- 10lbs of boost does not require near the cylinder head and camshaft a nat. aspd. motor will. And if tuned correctly will remain very reliable and safe not to mention the increased engine life due to lack of rpm's you will have to turn an all motor car all the time. (just look at NMRA Pure Street Cars)There are many different ways to build an 10-11 sec. car reliably. You just have to decide what you want to do, it all comes down to the greenbacks and what you consider streetable.
Click to expand...

Nicely said.
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Oct 16, 2007
#8
  • Oct 16, 2007
  • #8
Strokin that car in your avatar is sweet you own?
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Oct 17, 2007
#9
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #9
Personally i think your safest/best bet would be to get away from the thin walled stock 302 block. This means at least a 351 roller swap. You could leave it at 351 or stroke it...either way a nice HCI package on a 351 stroker will get you to at least the 11's. AFR 205's, custom cam, and RPM II intake would make for one hell of a setup. With drag radials it doesnt take all that much HP to get to the 11's if you have the proper suspension.

so first off look into full length sub frame connectors (weld in), torque box reinforcements, upper/lower control arms, and either 50/50's or 90/10's to really get the power to the ground. With a good suspension your 60' times could get into the 1.6-1.7 region easily...and really help get those ET's down.

I would think that with 400 rwhp it should be pretty easy to get deep into the 11's. If that doesnt work a nice 150 shot will surely get you there.
 

347strokin

New Member
Oct 2, 2007
27
0
0
Oct 17, 2007
#10
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #10
PUNISHER RACING said:
Strokin that car in your avatar is sweet you own?
Click to expand...

Yep, 07. Thanks
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Oct 17, 2007
#11
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #11
Post some pics up. What wheels?
 
1

11sec5ohh

New Member
Jan 7, 2004
14
0
1
Washington D.C.
Oct 19, 2007
#12
  • Oct 19, 2007
  • #12
It has stock pony wheels right now, I'll be worrying about all the cosmetics later...although the car is in pretty good shape.

Anyone have an opinion on the 390 hp Ford Racing "Z" crate engine? Although it retails for just under $6200 I was thinking about something like that. Anyone know how the Z303 cam sounds compared ot the other for 303 cams?

I had the older 302 crate engine with the aluminum "Y" heads and the B303 cam, with a few upgrades I clicked off a few 12.8 second passes on drag radials in my Notchback....Souldn't have sold that one.
Bought the longblock from ford (came with aluminum Y heads and the B303 cam) and added a GT-40 upper and lower, 24lb injectors, 190lph fuel pump, and besides full exhaust the motor was otherwise stock......that was an un-tuned consistant high 12 sec car too. It was my daily driver and never gave me one problem. Does anyone think the 390hp engine would be worth the cash for a more potent setup?
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Oct 19, 2007
#13
  • Oct 19, 2007
  • #13
About the same as the X. I think that engine would work well the Z heads are pretty good and with a better cam and intake is problably capable of another 40 horse or so. Plus those Ford crates seem to be pretty reliable and well built (huh reliable and 450 horse capable I'm in)
 

347strokin

New Member
Oct 2, 2007
27
0
0
Oct 19, 2007
#14
  • Oct 19, 2007
  • #14
PUNISHER RACING said:
Post some pics up. What wheels?
Click to expand...

Sorry to hijack, but here's some pics Punisher, the rims are 20" Boss. (I can't remember the model #)

http://forums.bradbarnett.net/showthread.php?t=67207
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Wheels-Tires Need Some Help - Brakes Upgrade/Wheel fitment
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
582
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
466
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
747
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 21, 2026
86_Capri
A
Thinking of building a BOSS 302 bottom end and have some questions!
  • Angelq1028
  • Apr 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
349
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2025
TOOLOW91
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?