• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Best Struts/Shocks for a rough street lowered car?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Twista
  • Start date Start date Jul 4, 2010

Twista

Active Member
May 7, 2004
510
2
29
@ the z00 in chicago
Jul 4, 2010
#1
  • Jul 4, 2010
  • #1
So on every bump it feels im breaking something. Like the car is bottoming out on the cars body and ground. The car is my DD and driven on the street 98% of the time where it sucks. On the highway its smooth as jelly.

Can you guys recommend another setup better than my current Tokico setup.

ty
My current setup: Eibach Pro-kit springs , Steeda X-2's ball joints, Tokico HP shocks/struts , BBK c/c's,
 

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
Jul 4, 2010
#2
  • Jul 4, 2010
  • #2
I'm running the same springs, but with the Eibach dampers designed to go with it. Really like the ride (prior to that I had fully stock suspension, then eibach springs with stock dampers. Just added the Eibach dampers this spring. FWIW, I put MM rear LCAs on at the same time; not sure if that had any effect on ride (it sure improved handling).
 

toyman

10 Year Member
Jul 19, 2007
1,944
54
79
Vernon BC
Jul 4, 2010
#3
  • Jul 4, 2010
  • #3
Husky44 said:
I'm running the same springs, but with the Eibach dampers designed to go with it. Really like the ride (prior to that I had fully stock suspension, then eibach springs with stock dampers. Just added the Eibach dampers this spring. FWIW, I put MM rear LCAs on at the same time; not sure if that had any effect on ride (it sure improved handling).
Click to expand...

The dampers just a different name for the struts or are they something entirely different?
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Jul 5, 2010
#4
  • Jul 5, 2010
  • #4
I'm running the same combo. It isn't that bad for the roads here (I have no idea what Chicago roads are like however).

How old are the components?
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Jul 5, 2010
#5
  • Jul 5, 2010
  • #5
toyman said:
The dampers just a different name for the struts or are they something entirely different?
Click to expand...
Same thing.
 
N

NinJa_FLiP

Member
Feb 6, 2010
80
0
6
NLV
Jul 5, 2010
#6
  • Jul 5, 2010
  • #6
what rims and tires u running? could be the culprit? switch to the stock 16's or 17's.. lol
 

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
Jul 5, 2010
#7
  • Jul 5, 2010
  • #7
toyman said:
The dampers just a different name for the struts or are they something entirely different?
Click to expand...

dampers is a more generic word that encompasses both struts (front) and shocks (rear). I'm a lazy butt and didn't want to type "shocks/struts."
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Jul 6, 2010
#8
  • Jul 6, 2010
  • #8
HISSIN50 said:
I'm running the same combo. It isn't that bad for the roads here (I have no idea what Chicago roads are like however).

How old are the components?
Click to expand...

Same thing but with sportlines and my car doesent feel like trash.
 

Twista

Active Member
May 7, 2004
510
2
29
@ the z00 in chicago
Jul 6, 2010
#9
  • Jul 6, 2010
  • #9
HISSIN50 said:
I'm running the same combo. It isn't that bad for the roads here (I have no idea what Chicago roads are like however).

How old are the components?
Click to expand...



No idea. I brought the car already lowered. And 17 inch cobra r's

245s up front
275 out back
 

Last5.0

Active Member
Nov 9, 2003
404
1
26
Jul 6, 2010
#10
  • Jul 6, 2010
  • #10
Depending on shock/strut brand and if the car is lowered 1.25" or more, it's usually better to run ones made for a fox on a lowered SN95 due to them being a shorter shock/strut.

I run fox length Strange 10-way adjustables
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Jul 6, 2010
#11
  • Jul 6, 2010
  • #11
Last5.0 said:
Depending on shock/strut brand and if the car is lowered 1.25" or more, it's usually better to run ones made for a fox on a lowered SN95 due to them being a shorter shock/strut.

I run fox length Strange 10-way adjustables
Click to expand...

All the aftermarket ones are fox length anyway.

I've found that lowered stangs just ride rough. The difference in opinion between one setup to another usually has to do with the driver, not the suspension setup. Rough is a subjective term. My suspension is very firm, but the car handles like it's on rails.

Kurt
 

Last5.0

Active Member
Nov 9, 2003
404
1
26
Jul 6, 2010
#12
  • Jul 6, 2010
  • #12
revhead347 said:
All the aftermarket ones are fox length anyway.
Click to expand...


Why does Strange have different part #'s for the '79-93 and '94-04 for both their struts and shocks then?

I bought mine years back at World Ford Challenge and asked the techs at the trailer about which model to run on both of my lowered cars ('95 and '02). they said if it was lowered less than about an inch then stock '94-04 length would be fine, otherwise use fox length.

All said an done, my point was that with a lowered car it's best to call the particular shock/strut manufacturer you are thinking of running and ask them.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,644
214
Acworth, GA
Jul 6, 2010
#13
  • Jul 6, 2010
  • #13
Yeah, I guess I should correct myself. Most of the aftermarket manufacturers are fox length anyway. Tokico, KYB all list the same part numbers.

Kurt
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 6, 2010
#14
  • Jul 6, 2010
  • #14
I have the pro-kit as well, same set up with HP's and it rides EXCELLENT! and I am picky! Are you sure thats what you have?
 

KamiKaziDK

Member
May 16, 2005
555
0
17
Mesa, Az
Jul 6, 2010
#15
  • Jul 6, 2010
  • #15
The roads in Chicago totally suck ass.....maybe that's all that it is? I hated driving my car there with the stock suspension, lowering a car with aftermarket shocks will stiffen anything up a little at minimum, have you driven it anywhere that doesn't have cracks and potholes ever 3 inches? One of the reasons I will never move out of Arizona, our roads are generally smooth
 

Bosko5.0

Active Member
May 18, 2006
1,067
0
37
longwood, FL
Jul 8, 2010
#16
  • Jul 8, 2010
  • #16
I am running Steeda sport springs with mach 1 tokico's up front, and out back Iam running bilstien coilovers with 500lb springs

Up front I have 4" of droop And 1.75" of bump
Out back i have 3.5" of droop and 3.5" of bump

I think I need coilovers for the front.

It rides okay till I run over anything thats 1"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
262
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
198
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
SOLD For Sale '92 LX Street/Drag car - WV
  • MikeyMustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 31, 2025
MikeyMustang
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
907
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Suspension A not-so-low lowering spring
  • Justin87
  • Mar 7, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 12, 2024
Justin87
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?