• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Best Under Drive Pullies...

  • Thread starter Thread starter STANGBOYTOM
  • Start date Start date Jan 24, 2004
S

STANGBOYTOM

New Member
May 3, 2003
393
0
0
Jan 24, 2004
#1
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #1
Lets take a poll who makes that best under drive pullies for the 94-95 cars ?, march,FMS,ASP.........
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jan 24, 2004
#2
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #2
ASP aluminum
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Jan 24, 2004
#3
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #3
There hasn't been a set of pulleys that have been named superior the the other. I, as well of most others like the ASP designs because they are aluminum and lighter than the stockers. They haven't been proven to produce more power than the FMS or March pulley sets.

Joe
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Jan 24, 2004
#4
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #4
March
ASP
FMS

All of these are great.
 

BlueOvalStangGT

Active Member
Oct 27, 2003
2,849
0
46
Tampa Florida....USF!!!
Jan 24, 2004
#5
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #5
I bought a set of Mr. Gasket underdrive pulleys, what could be so different about underdrive pulleys? I can understand maybe the weight but wouldn't every company have the largest possible circumference for maximum power? Should i sell mine and get some march or asp?
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Jan 24, 2004
#6
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #6
I think what you mean is the minimum possible circumference. The crank pulley is what produces most of the power, and you want that to be as small as possible. Anyhow, no, I wouldn't sell your pulleys. It wouldn't be worth it. If you were to pick up any power, it would be less than 2 horsepower.

Joe
 

ARed1995GT

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
401
0
0
Boca Raton, FL
Jan 24, 2004
#7
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #7
Are the MAC underdrive pulleys any good?
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Jan 24, 2004
#8
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #8
i have MAC's and i like them, was definatly a noticeable difference in power. i havnt tried any other brands but i dont think it would make all that much of a difference
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jan 24, 2004
#9
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #9
Joes95GT said:
There hasn't been a set of pulleys that have been named superior the the other. I, as well of most others like the ASP designs because they are aluminum and lighter than the stockers. They haven't been proven to produce more power than the FMS or March pulley sets.

Joe
Click to expand...


I beg to differ with you Joe. I have seen better gains from ASP pulleys than any others. I went from 14.96 at 91.5 to 14.5 at 94.89 with nothing more than ASP alum. pulleys. I have not seen that from any of the others. If you have, please correct me.
 
D

David R

New Member
Dec 21, 2002
256
0
0
Ohio
Jan 25, 2004
#10
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #10
Do U.D. pulleys work with the stock belt size?
Right now I have a short bely to bypass the smog pump.

Just wasn't sure if I'd need Another belt

Thanks.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jan 25, 2004
#11
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #11
Yes, 99% of the UD pulleys on the market for mustangs use the stock belt.
 
9

'94Vert5.0

New Member
Apr 9, 2003
16
0
0
Bel Air, MD
Jan 25, 2004
#12
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #12
I chose ASP and I was very happy with the results, althought I can't compare to others. You can find them for a pretty good price too.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Jan 25, 2004
#13
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #13
Killercanary said:
I beg to differ with you Joe. I have seen better gains from ASP pulleys than any others. I went from 14.96 at 91.5 to 14.5 at 94.89 with nothing more than ASP alum. pulleys. I have not seen that from any of the others. If you have, please correct me.
Click to expand...
Paul, you could be right. What I meant (but didn't say) is that since all U/D pulley sets have all of the same sizes (circumferences), the only real power difference would come from the weight of the pulley because all the underdriven accessories are all moving at the same speed with a different pulley. I have personally seen a set of FMS right next to a March set and they were both the exact same, so those are the two that I am basing my comparison off of. If ASP pulleys have different sizes than FMS and MAC, then there is where the extra power is from. Otherwise, it is all in the weight of the material.

WHOA! After re-reading my post, I think some people would have a hard time understanding it. Sorry if you do, but that is the best I can do. I suck at describing stuff.

Joe
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
Portland, OR
Jan 25, 2004
#14
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #14
One question for all you guys who have under drive pullies , are you running hot with pullies , some people said engine run hot and alternator can't make enough
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Jan 25, 2004
#15
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #15
no problems with my car running hot but my alt dosent fully charge when im sitting at lights for a few seconds but as soon as the RPM's go above 900 it goes back to normal
 

viperos

New Member
May 19, 2003
2,943
0
0
Bellevue, WA (yes, the land where every 16 year o
Jan 25, 2004
#16
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #16
I LOVE my asp... Mac is just, in my opinion, a cheap A$$ company... no problems w/ my ASPs though, not really a charging problem, just dim lights at idle... I am running a little warmer w/ them, but really nothing too much to worry about, I just slap a 160 thermo in for the racing season, and manually control my electric fan and I'm fine...
 

BlueOvalStangGT

Active Member
Oct 27, 2003
2,849
0
46
Tampa Florida....USF!!!
Jan 25, 2004
#17
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #17
only the crank is supposed to have a smaller circumference right? my alternator and my water pump pulley are both bigger then my stockers, is this right?
 

viperos

New Member
May 19, 2003
2,943
0
0
Bellevue, WA (yes, the land where every 16 year o
Jan 25, 2004
#18
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #18
yes, that is right...

-and it is called paracitic loss, the power taken to move an object relative to a similar object at lighter weight... (physics major) (hey, I actually learned something in school!) YEAH!
 
S

STANGBOYTOM

New Member
May 3, 2003
393
0
0
Jan 26, 2004
#19
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #19
I whould have thought that with the bigger alternator on the 94-95 cars that there whould be no charging problems. My old 91 LX 5.0 with asp's didn't like to charge much at all unless you were cruzing at 70.
 

viperos

New Member
May 19, 2003
2,943
0
0
Bellevue, WA (yes, the land where every 16 year o
Jan 26, 2004
#20
  • Jan 26, 2004
  • #20
well, having a smaller crank makes the belt move slower first, then having the larger alt pulley makes the alt turn even slower... so yeah, it makes sense...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
372
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
W
Excited to Join the Mustang Community
  • Word24
  • Sep 9, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
392
The Welcome Wagon Dec 30, 2025
General karthief
Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
C
1992 LX 2,3, automatic problems, oil dissapears.
  • Carpimp
  • Aug 10, 2025
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
2
Views
223
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Aug 10, 2025
General karthief
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?