• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Better mileage @ higher RPMS????

  • Thread starter Thread starter sixstringthing
  • Start date Start date Nov 19, 2004
S

sixstringthing

New Member
Aug 11, 2003
297
0
0
Nov 19, 2004
#1
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #1
Ive been using pretty much all 4th on the highway recently, usually around 3k rpms (as opposed to like 1700 in 5th) and to my surprise, i actually seem to be getting better MPG, its pretty noticeable on the needle. I used to spend like $16 a week on gas now im spending around $10.... what gives?? Not that im complaining or anything
 

merc123

Active Member
Jan 27, 2003
420
2
39
North GA
Nov 19, 2004
#2
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #2
There has to be something different in driving style.
 
T

tripsober

New Member
May 18, 2003
217
0
0
massachusetts
Nov 19, 2004
#3
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #3
overdrive when it is on your car drives at lower rpms to save gas..... so i am guessing lower rpms you use less gas 8^)
 

nickthegenius

Active Member
Dec 23, 2002
1,631
1
38
Elwood, IN
Nov 19, 2004
#4
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #4
sixstringthing said:
Ive been using pretty much all 4th on the highway recently, usually around 3k rpms (as opposed to like 1700 in 5th) and to my surprise, i actually seem to be getting better MPG, its pretty noticeable on the needle. I used to spend like $16 a week on gas now im spending around $10.... what gives?? Not that im complaining or anything
Click to expand...

If there is a 1300rpm spread between 4th and 5th, you should probably go have your car checked out. My Sentra started doing this before the clutch went out. The spread between 3rd and 4th kept getting bigger and the clutch would hold better in 3rd. Then, when I'd go into 4th it would rev higher than normal due to the slippage. Maybe your clutch is shot.
 
S

sixstringthing

New Member
Aug 11, 2003
297
0
0
Nov 19, 2004
#5
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #5
Oh the rpm at 5th was just estimated, might be higher.

I have been driving differently, ive actually been getting on it more and shifting a bit higher. Makes no sense but I don't mind this at all.
The only thing I could think of is I was lugging the engine too much before, but i somehow doubt it.
 

Indiana

New Member
May 6, 2004
286
0
0
Nov 19, 2004
#6
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #6
Lower rpm does not always equal better mileage. Engines have a range of peak efficiency. You can hurt your economy by going to slow.

If I remember right, the best mpg is had when your rpm is just below peak torque.
 

40th GT

New Member
Apr 7, 2004
916
0
0
Lawrenceville, GA
Nov 19, 2004
#7
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #7
I think it depends on the throttle control (steadyness) and how much the throttle is open.
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Nov 19, 2004
#8
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #8
I do almost all of my driving on the highway. I get the best mileage between 50-60 mph.[stupid 55mph speed limits ] Any faster than that, my mileage goes down. Cruising 70mph isn't too much lower, but 80mph, my mileage starts going down hill. Have you ever actually figured out your mpg or are you just wondering if would be better? Also, driving in 4th on the highway will increase wear on your engine.
 

todd4566

Founding Member
May 24, 2000
1,075
0
36
California
Nov 19, 2004
#9
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #9
Wish I could say higher RPMs was giving me better gas mileage. Since the swap to 4.10s, 80mph on the highway sux . The other aspects are great though!
 

merc123

Active Member
Jan 27, 2003
420
2
39
North GA
Nov 19, 2004
#10
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #10
So where do you draw the RPM line for driving? Is 1,000 too low and too much lugging of the motor?
 

joshheat25

Member
Nov 8, 2004
871
0
16
Delaware
Nov 19, 2004
#11
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #11
I have an auto and it doesen't do to bad on the high way 22-25 mpg depending! At 70 rpms at about 2,250!
 
S

sixstringthing

New Member
Aug 11, 2003
297
0
0
Nov 21, 2004
#12
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #12
No ive never checked my MPG, I could care less what im getting, its just a number... im more concerned with what comes out of my wallet to pay for that gas. Just by looking at the needle it's so obvious that I am now having more gas left over every week, plus gas has only gone down about two cents and I'm saving about $5 a week.
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Nov 21, 2004
#13
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #13
sixstringthing said:
No ive never checked my MPG, I could care less what im getting, its just a number... im more concerned with what comes out of my wallet to pay for that gas. Just by looking at the needle it's so obvious that I am now having more gas left over every week, plus gas has only gone down about two cents and I'm saving about $5 a week.
Click to expand...
Not sure what year Stang you have but you said you are turning 1700rpm in 5th, which means you have 3.27 gears. This also means that in 4th gear you would be turning 2568rpms at 60mph in 4th. Looking at this a different way, to equal this given rpm, in 5th, you would have to install 4.81 rear gears [lets just say, for this example, that was such a gear ratio] It would seem to me, that a Stang with 3.27 rear gears would get considerably better fuel mileage than the same car with a rear gear ratio of 4.81
Next time you go for a drive, say 100 miles, try filling your gas tank right to the fuel neck with gas, drive the 100 miles to your destination in 4th gear and refill with gas. Figure out your mileage, then do the same thing back home, only try driving in 5th gear.I think you'll see which gear will produce the best fuel mileage.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Nov 21, 2004
#14
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #14
sixstringthing said:
No ive never checked my MPG, I could care less what im getting, its just a number... im more concerned with what comes out of my wallet to pay for that gas. Just by looking at the needle it's so obvious that I am now having more gas left over every week, plus gas has only gone down about two cents and I'm saving about $5 a week.
Click to expand...
you should care, mileage is a good thing to keep track of
if you have a sudden drop something could be wrong with the car
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Nov 21, 2004
#15
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #15
JonJon said:
you should care, mileage is a good thing to keep track of
if you have a sudden drop something could be wrong with the car
Click to expand...
Yup, that's what I was thinking
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Questions About T5 Manual
  • Blackout67
  • Apr 13, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
589
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2025
89ripper
Help with AFR reading
  • dz01
  • Nov 14, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
514
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 8, 2025
GOvert
G
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
98 GT PI Swapped Engine Fires, Dies Immediately NOT PATS
  • MMccPerformance
  • Dec 2, 2023
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2023
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
95 GT getting Trickflow upper engine kit and more after 20 years parked, help required.
  • newfiestang
  • Oct 18, 2022
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
4K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 22, 2022
96pushrod
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?