I recently graduated from UTI and learned ALOT. one of the classes was all on performance and how to blueprint an engine. We LITERALLY mic'd every part of a the motor (main journal, bores, cam lobes). The teacher said, when building a new motor, you should mic EVERYTHING and keep it in a tolerance of spec, as new parts arent necessarily 100% true. This is understandable... but is it really necessary?
I understand the mathematics behind the motor (how big intake valve should be in terms of bore size, how long exhaust headers should be in terms of chamber)... so i know how to make an engine be efficient. But do you engine builder ACTUALLY mic ever piece of the motor and mill/oversize/undersize accordingly, even though bought new? Or do you just assume the size of a crank journal and get the correct size bearing accordingly?
hope this sparks some conversation. as I am very interested.
I understand the mathematics behind the motor (how big intake valve should be in terms of bore size, how long exhaust headers should be in terms of chamber)... so i know how to make an engine be efficient. But do you engine builder ACTUALLY mic ever piece of the motor and mill/oversize/undersize accordingly, even though bought new? Or do you just assume the size of a crank journal and get the correct size bearing accordingly?
hope this sparks some conversation. as I am very interested.