• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech

Boss302 Torque vs. GT

  • Thread starter Thread starter willie2323
  • Start date Start date Apr 14, 2011
W

willie2323

New Member
Jun 21, 2010
8
0
0
Apr 14, 2011
#1
  • Apr 14, 2011
  • #1
Greetings All,
I am not sure the Ford website is correct but it is reporting less torque (380 lb.-ft) in the Boss 302 than the standard GT (390 lb.-ft)? I dont know about other potential Boss purchaser's but I sure want better quarter mile times in the Boss stang than the GT for the additional 10K+ of cost...what am I missing?

Comments?

thanx All,

Bill
 

JKidd

Member
Aug 21, 2007
164
3
19
Suffield, CT
Apr 14, 2011
#2
  • Apr 14, 2011
  • #2
The Boss isn't optimized for quarter mile performance. Its primary goal is to be an awesome track machine. The intake has shorter runners and the heads have been worked to sustain higher RPMs (along with supporting internal mods). While horsepower is up, if you look at the curves (comparing the GT and the Boss), the peak power comes on later (the Boss starts pulling away above 4500 rpm) - an area that can really be used on the track.

Whether the Boss is actually down 10 ft.-lbs. peak torque is even actually being debated.

Regardless, I would still expect the Boss to put down better quarter mile times than a GT...but that difference would be magnified on a road course where the Boss would have a much clearer advantage.
 
D

dwilkens

New Member
Jan 23, 2011
13
0
0
Apr 14, 2011
#3
  • Apr 14, 2011
  • #3
it runs a 12.3 in the 1/4.
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Apr 14, 2011
#4
  • Apr 14, 2011
  • #4
The BOSS has a short runner intake therefore it will lose a bit of torque however it allows for higher RPM band creating the 444HP vs GT's 412
 
W

willie2323

New Member
Jun 21, 2010
8
0
0
Apr 15, 2011
#5
  • Apr 15, 2011
  • #5
All,

great technical to-the-point comments...

understood on the clear direction of the Boss...track, so the engine mods make sense.

thanx guys,

Bill
 
L

lokstag1

New Member
Mar 26, 2011
36
0
0
Apr 21, 2011
#6
  • Apr 21, 2011
  • #6
It's all about average power put to the ground. any little bit of tire spin = power NOT put to the ground. Thats why slicks go faster at the track. Much faster. That 10lb feet will get over shadowed a lot by stock tires and less than maximally efficient power transfer. Less complicated answer is don't sweat it, doesn't matter much.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
835
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
844
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Fox Build ideas for the 'Hudson Heap' (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Sep 19, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2023
MadSquirrelTech
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?