• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Box upper for Victor EFI lower?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DemonGT
  • Start date Start date Jan 15, 2006

DemonGT

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
871
51
49
Sparta,WI
Jan 15, 2006
#1
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #1
was wondering if there is a box upper for the victor EFI lower?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jan 15, 2006
#2
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #2
I am pretty sure Jim @ Reichard Racing could make you one. The onlt other place I can think of is Hogans.

www.ReichardRacing.com

Whay would you want to switch from what you have? The Victor EFI works very well...
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Jan 15, 2006
#3
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #3
A box intake is good for forced induction or very high RPM engines. I didn't see either one in your sig. Is this a future plan?
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jan 15, 2006
#4
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #4
subscribing
 

bluevenom867

I will have images of molesting stuffed animals in
Dec 15, 2003
1,704
1
0
St.Petersburg,FL
Jan 15, 2006
#5
  • Jan 15, 2006
  • #5
A larger box upper has more plenum volume,so it will make more power.Its just like a large carb,a bigger one most always makes more peak power,even if it seems totally over kill.

Though a 6.8 you say (Is it like a 408-418?) is a large enough motor it could use more plenum volume,but I dont see your heads keeping up.
 

DemonGT

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
871
51
49
Sparta,WI
Jan 16, 2006
#6
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #6
i was under the impression it worked well if ported....and i was going to have the throttle body opening made bigger to 90mm or as close as they can get..but i was just possibly exploring other possibilities before having it done...not sure if having that TB opening enlarged will do much anyway

also thought about switching to the TFS R intake...thought that one flowed better then the victor?? after buying the victor intake i peaked in the box to make sure it was what it was suppose to be and it sat in a closet for awhile till the day i installed it...never looked it over very close before...i should have...i already had the RTV layed down on the block before noticing the ports on the lower intake looked like crap....i guess i could aways take it off and have it ported...

also have seen others with bigger N/A strokers use box uppers and make good numbers
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jan 16, 2006
#7
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #7
How many rpms do you turn currently, what was the cam spec'd out for rpm wise... If you do not want to post the came specs e-mail them do me, I use a lot of Ed' stuff.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jan 16, 2006
#8
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #8
The R has longer runners - which may not be good depending on target rpm band.........
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jan 16, 2006
#9
  • Jan 16, 2006
  • #9
Here are my thoughts on the box vs long runner intakes.

The large strokers will not be lacking for bottom end power. A long runner intake will enhance the low end, but will limit the peak rpm. I figured there was no need to enhance the low end of a motor that is already going to be a torque monster. Then again I am not taking the car to a track on a regular basis, and if my setup is not optimal, I don't really care. It is a daily driver, that is very fun to drive.

Another reason I stayed with the Comp Cam polymer upper was that it would be easier to shorten the intake. I had the intake machined down a little to provide clearance with the stock hood.

That is my opinion on it
good luck
jason
 

DemonGT

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
871
51
49
Sparta,WI
Jan 17, 2006
#10
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #10
Rick, i dont have a specific RPM really...i think i might of told Ed i didnt want to go over 6K with it...whats your email Rick i have the spec sheet scanned and saved and ill email it to you. mabe you can give me a heads up as to what intake and RPM range the cam likes
 

DemonGT

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
871
51
49
Sparta,WI
Jan 17, 2006
#11
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #11
vri - do you have a web site or pics of your car?
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jan 17, 2006
#12
  • Jan 17, 2006
  • #12
DemonGT said:
vri - do you have a web site or pics of your car?
Click to expand...

Sorry dude. I have never progressed that far. I may be able to email someting if you are looking for something in particular.

By the way that is not my car in my avatar. I need to replace that.
 

DemonGT

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
871
51
49
Sparta,WI
Jan 18, 2006
#13
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #13
havnt progressed that far? oh..haha...you can just find a place that lets you upload your pics then just give people the address..some places wont let you link to the pic but you can post the full address link of the pic and it will work...like i cant make it so the pic of my car actually shows up on stangnet but i can give out a address and people can click on it and it will show

i was just cerious as to what your car looked like i guess....
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jan 18, 2006
#14
  • Jan 18, 2006
  • #14
Well with a 6000rpm band I do not think you will pick up much with a box upper on top of the Victor. I would pull the lower and clean it up, if you wanted more plenum volume you could make a spacer to fit between it and your end cap/plate but I really do not feel it is necessary.

Rick91GT@suscom.net
 

DemonGT

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
871
51
49
Sparta,WI
Jan 19, 2006
#15
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #15
Rick in your opinion what could i change with what i have done to the motor to give it some more power...only things iv had on my "to do" list are a 80mm pro m meter and then having the upper intake TB opening enlarged

other then that there isnt much i can do...atleast not without swaping cams and heads etc.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jan 19, 2006
#16
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #16
The Victor responds well to porting, but you have to do the upper AND lower. Not sure the $/HP will be there for a <6,000 rpm motor though...............
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jan 19, 2006
#17
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #17
I just looked at the cam sheet...

What compression is the motor?
 

DemonGT

Founding Member
May 24, 2002
871
51
49
Sparta,WI
Jan 19, 2006
#18
  • Jan 19, 2006
  • #18
right around 10.5 to 1, give or take

10.5 to 1 is what the spec sheet from Keith Craft says
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fuel Anyone know a part number for a 3/8" inlet/outlet efi quick connect fuel filter that would fit the stock foxbody location?
  • rednotch
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
239
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 8, 2025
rednotch
Trick Flow Series R to Box R Upper Intake Road Block
  • Habu135
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
78
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
Habu135
For Sale Trick Flow Box R Series Upper Intake w/90 mm Inlet
  • Habu135
  • Apr 30, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
1
Views
139
Engine and Power Adder Jun 11, 2026
Habu135
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
171
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
Engine Explorer - Lower intake internal cleaning
  • R82148V
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 6, 2025
rednotch
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?