• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Brake kits - manual versus auto trans, why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jcode68
  • Start date Start date May 18, 2008

jcode68

Active Member
Jul 15, 2003
892
1
29
Massachussetts
May 18, 2008
#1
  • May 18, 2008
  • #1
I'm helping a friend do some upgrades on his 67, one of which is power disc brake upgrade. I put the SSBC Force 10 front kit on my car a couple of years ago and have been really impressed with the performance and quality, so he will probably go with this kit as well. When looking at the kits offered, they have 1 for manual trans and a different 1 for automatic. He currently has an automatic (C6) that the previous owner installed, but the car is a factory manual trans and I assume still has the original pedal support. So my question is, why do they offer different kits? My guess is something to do with the brake pedal spacing for manual versus auto, but want to make sure he gets the right one given his setup. He also might convert back to a manual trans at some point and would like to minimize replacing parts. I will call SSBC tomorrow if nobody on the forum knows the answer.
Thanks.
 
G

gsxrken

Member
Sep 12, 2005
206
1
18
Weschester County, NY
May 18, 2008
#2
  • May 18, 2008
  • #2
Post the answer when you find out. I'm curious too. Other than the width of the pedal pad itself, I can't imagine why they need to know the trans type.
Now, if asking Manual or power they mean the brakes, then yeah, I could see a difference in pedal ratios and supports.
 
R

ron67fb

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2001
1,117
0
36
SF Bay area, CA
May 18, 2008
#3
  • May 18, 2008
  • #3
It's the width of the brake pedal; I cut mine off while converting to manual. My car went from auto trans and manual drum brakes to T5 and factory power discs without changing the pedal support.
 

jcode68

Active Member
Jul 15, 2003
892
1
29
Massachussetts
May 19, 2008
#4
  • May 19, 2008
  • #4
I called SSBC today and asked them what the dillio was. There are 2 differences. The power booster is smaller so it doesn't interfere with the clutch linkage and second as we all thought, is the smaller brake pedal. Given the high potential of my friend going back to manual trans, he will order the manual kit.
 

ultrastang

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
1,092
2
37
Arkansas
May 19, 2008
#5
  • May 19, 2008
  • #5
Not so much of a problem in a '67-'70 Mustang if you are converting to power brakes and have a manual transmission and if you are using the factory-style 7" diameter brake booster. The diameter of the 7" brake booster is small enough to clear the clutch linkage rod going through the firewall beside the booster [if you were to use the mecahnical setup].

In a '65/'66 Mustang though, it makes a big difference in what type of transmission you have if converting to power brakes. The stock '65/'66 Mustang power brake boosters have a bracket that stands the booster out away from the firewall. With this arrangement, there isn't enough room between the face of the booster and the back of the shock tower to mount a dual reservoir MC. --you are limited to a single reservoir MC.

A power brake booster that does work in the '65/'66 models with a dual reservoir MC is the '79-'93 2.3L "pancake" 9" diameter vacuum booster. However, the booster covers up the hole in the firewall where the factory mechanical clutch rod linkage passes through the firewall. This means with this booster, you would have to use a cable clutch to actuate the fork on a manual transmission.

The smaller 7" diameter '87-'95 5.0L Fox Mustang booster would also work in the '65/'66 models, but even with the smaller diameter, the booster still covers up the hole in the firewall of the '65/'66s because the hole on them is located much more "in-board" toward the steering column compared to the '67-'70 Mustangs.

With a '67-'70 Mustang, and the stock diameter vacuum booster, you could use the mechanical linkage or you could run a hydraulic clutch setup, or a cable clutch. In the '65/'66 models, if you use an aftermarket or retro-fit Fox booster, you will have no other choice but to use a cable clutch if running a manual transmission. --If the Mustang (regardless of model) has an automatic, the booster type doesn't matter as long as it will bolt up and fits within the confines of the space around it.
 
S

surfer446

New Member
Apr 14, 2010
3
0
0
Apr 14, 2010
#6
  • Apr 14, 2010
  • #6
Late model M/C and Booster on 65 Mustang

Hi, I was reading your thread, and I had a couple questions for you. I have a 65 mustang with a 5.0 302 and a t5 tranny with a cable clutch. It currently has all wheel disc brakes and a booster with a single bowl master cylinder. I want to change that setup to a dual bowl. I know I need a proportioner, but will either the 79' - 93' 2.3L 9" pancake booster or the 87' -95' 5.0 7" booster with a dual bowl M/C work with my setup? do i need to remove the bracket that the current booster is bolted to to the fire wall? Thanks for your help.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Apr 14, 2010
#7
  • Apr 14, 2010
  • #7
ultrastang said:
In a '65/'66 Mustang though, it makes a big difference in what type of transmission you have if converting to power brakes. The stock '65/'66 Mustang power brake boosters have a bracket that stands the booster out away from the firewall. With this arrangement, there isn't enough room between the face of the booster and the back of the shock tower to mount a dual reservoir MC. --you are limited to a single reservoir MC.
Click to expand...

Not true. The 64-66 booster clears the tower with this cylinder:

 
S

surfer446

New Member
Apr 14, 2010
3
0
0
Apr 15, 2010
#8
  • Apr 15, 2010
  • #8
Not true. The 64-66 booster clears the tower with this cylinder:

What type of booster and M/C is that? and where can I get one? Will it work for a manual T5 transmission with a cable clutch?
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Apr 15, 2010
#9
  • Apr 15, 2010
  • #9
It comes from Master Power Brake. Glazier Nolan has used them on conversions, and they really like them.
 
S

surfer446

New Member
Apr 14, 2010
3
0
0
Apr 15, 2010
#10
  • Apr 15, 2010
  • #10
The problem with that M/C and booster is they don't make one for Disc/Disc
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Apr 15, 2010
#11
  • Apr 15, 2010
  • #11
2+2GT said:
Not true. The 64-66 booster clears the tower with this cylinder:

Click to expand...
It will clear. But the old MC's they used to used where better. They weren't chromed. Now the new chromed versions have bits of flaked off chrome in the MC bore, and when you bench bleed it looks like a shaken up snow globe.But the booster are a better batch. No clicking, and no bad diaphragms this time.
 
C

chockostang

New Member
Jun 16, 2009
106
0
0
Apr 16, 2010
#12
  • Apr 16, 2010
  • #12
If indeed a 67, simply install the Correct, Factory 67 Midland booster. It will clear the Clutch linkage, bolt in.

When using the Factory Midland, you will need the Power Disc Pedal, the manual drum pedal will not work.


The factory 67 setup has leverage advantages as well. Your support under the dash will more than likely already have the factory drilled holes to mount the Power Disc pedal, however, there were some not drilled.

Dan @

Chockostang
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Brakes 1966 Mustang convertible 289, Auto - Disc brake conversion issues
  • DRGunn427
  • Feb 26, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
631
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 30, 2026
manicmechanic007
C
5r55s auto to TR3650 Manual swap 4.0 V6
  • Ceskz
  • Feb 24, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 Specific V6 Tech Mar 27, 2025
89ripper
Which SN95 axles for 93 LX, disc brakes, ABS rings?
  • dan50
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
416
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
7-UP BILL
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
S
65 Coupe I6 Auto to 302 EFI 5 Speed Swap
  • Scuderia
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?