• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

bypass fuel regulator for carb. swap?

  • Thread starter Thread starter z2o_what
  • Start date Start date Feb 4, 2006

z2o_what

Member
Mar 31, 2005
309
1
19
princeton, WV
Feb 4, 2006
#1
  • Feb 4, 2006
  • #1
im swaping my '86 5.0 into a 4cyl. car and also changing it to carb.

i would like to use the stock fuel pump but have read negative comments about keeping it...but would i be safe to use a bypass fuel regulator instead of a standard???

this way i figure that it wouldn't be such a dramatic drop from 40 to 7 psi.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Feb 4, 2006
#2
  • Feb 4, 2006
  • #2
why not just rip out old fuel lines and run new 3/8 aluminium tube. its easy i did it in my 86. then you have all the supply of fuel you need and you have it at the right pressure.
 

z2o_what

Member
Mar 31, 2005
309
1
19
princeton, WV
Feb 4, 2006
#3
  • Feb 4, 2006
  • #3
im assuming that 3/8 line is smaller than stock...so by running 3/8 line from the tank to the motor will restrict flow enough to run a carb without the use of a regulator???
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Feb 4, 2006
#4
  • Feb 4, 2006
  • #4
A word of warning on EFI to carb swaps: don’t expect to pass emissions in any state that does comprehensive smog inspections, because it won’t happen. You must know how to read electrical diagrams and wire circuits properly to do the swap. Don’t take shortcuts or cut corners in the fabrication of the electrical or mechanical assemblies. If you do NASCAR quality work, the car will look good, run good and be as reliable as a carb’d car can be. Take pride in a job done with excellence.

If you do the hack job that is common among folks who don’t understand electricity or computers and are doing the conversion because it is easier than dealing with the EFI system, the result will look like and run like road kill. Wiring harnesses chopped up and spliced together with electrical tape, loose and dangling hoses, fuel lines spliced together with 3 types of fittings speak of ignorance and sloppy workmanship. If you can't do it right, don't do it at all. I wouldn’t wish a car with that kind of workmanship off on my worst enemy...

Now that the rant is over, here’s some practical advice…

Do not use an EFI in tank fuel pump with a carb. You will never get the pressure/flow regulated properly. Either go full EFI or use a tank/fuel pump/fuel lines out of an 85 or earlier Stang. Fabricating your own setup is possible but there are some snags to overcome.

Do not attempt to leave the EFI in place in an attempt to control either the electric fuel pump or ignition. Doing so qualifies you for the “Road Kill Mechanics Award”.

If you try to use your current tank, you will need to pull the fuel pump out and fabricate a pickup tube & strainer sock to replace the fuel pump. Or you can have a sump fabricated and welded onto you existing tank. Many welding shops will not weld fuel tanks because of the dangers involved if the tank isn't purged properly.

You will need an external electric fuel pump unless you change the timing cover for one with the mechanical fuel pump mount on it. Since you seem to be determined to rip all the EFI wiring out, the computer controlled fuel pump won't work. You will need to add a relay & switch and wire in the existing inertia switch for an external low pressure electric fuel pump.

You will need to run some new fuel feed lines or braided hose. The 3/8" aluminum tubing works well, but you will need a flaring tool and bending springs to fabricate the lines. Braided hose is easy to run and route, but is much more expensive. It is about $3.50-$4.00 a foot plus the end fittings, which are $3-$4 each. Fabricating hose assembles can be difficult, but anyplace that makes hydraulic hoses can do it for you for an extra charge. See http://www.amazonhose.com for more information.

While you are at the electrical part, you'll need a Durspark or similar ignition system. The EFI ignition depends on the EFI sensors to advance the spark. Rip out the TPS and MAP/Baro sensors and the computer will have no idea of the proper ignition timing for best performance. Running a fixed timing setting is only for test purposes or for a race track only car. Don't try it on the street: the results will not be nearly as good as a properly setup Durspark or equal. Crane makes a really nice distributor for non-EFI applications. See http://www.cranecams.com/index.php?show=browseParts&lvl=4&prt=127 for more information.
 

z2o_what

Member
Mar 31, 2005
309
1
19
princeton, WV
Feb 5, 2006
#5
  • Feb 5, 2006
  • #5
all that i wanted to know was if it would be better to use a bypass regulator than a standard. i didn't need a lecture.

and, i never said that i was "ripping" the wiring out of the car...and if i need to the MAP sensor i'll just run a vac. to it and see what happens.
 
Reactions: amps1956

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Feb 5, 2006
#6
  • Feb 5, 2006
  • #6
z2o_what said:
all that i wanted to know was if it would be better to use a bypass regulator than a standard. i didn't need a lecture.

and, i never said that i was "ripping" the wiring out of the car...and if i need to the MAP sensor i'll just run a vac. to it and see what happens.
Click to expand...
I must have hit a nerve here...Obliviously you got offended and didn't read closely past the second paragraph. Too bad, there is some good advice there.

jrichker said:
Don’t take shortcuts or cut corners in the fabrication of the electrical or mechanical assemblies. If you do NASCAR quality work, the car will look good, run good and be as reliable as a carb’d car can be. Take pride in a job done with excellence."
Click to expand...
I stand by what I said. No exceptions, no apologies.
 

joel5.0

Member
Jun 15, 2004
429
2
18
Puerto Rico
Feb 5, 2006
#7
  • Feb 5, 2006
  • #7
z2o_what said:
all that i wanted to know was if it would be better to use a bypass regulator than a standard. i didn't need a lecture.

and, i never said that i was "ripping" the wiring out of the car...and if i need to the MAP sensor i'll just run a vac. to it and see what happens.
Click to expand...

Z20_what;

Jrichker is simply trying to give you good advice, nothing to feel ashamed or angry about...he's trying to help you!...(the words "Thank You" come to mind)

Regarding your original question, keeping the original high pressure pump is a no-no. If you don't want to mess with fuel lines, sumped tanks, etc....the other option would be to replace your hi-press in-tank pump for a Taurus '88 CFI in-tank pump (will bring pressure down to 19-23 PSI), keep the OEM fuel lines and yes....use an adjustable bypass regulator (see pic):



That's the setup I've had for 13 yrs. now and no problems.....but you need to replace the hi-pressure fuel pump. GL
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Feb 5, 2006
#8
  • Feb 5, 2006
  • #8
Good stuff here, anyone else have experience with the low pressure in tank pump?

I was thinking that the lp in tank route would be a good one, but did not know of a suitable pump.

I am also skeptical of using a Holley or Aeromotive in line with the suction line run out of the top of the tank. I have heard people say it works, but it seems like it would risk cavitation at launches, with the fuel going to the rear of the tank, and they having to be pulled up to the top of the tank to go forward.

So far, a sump or fuel cell seems like the only good answer.
 

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Feb 6, 2006
#9
  • Feb 6, 2006
  • #9
z2o_what said:
all that i wanted to know was if it would be better to use a bypass regulator than a standard. i didn't need a lecture.

and, i never said that i was "ripping" the wiring out of the car...and if i need to the MAP sensor i'll just run a vac. to it and see what happens.
Click to expand...
I don't think he was lecturing you, he was offering good advice. If you want to be an ass about it though, I would say figure it out yourself and let us know how it turns out. Food for thought...... Maybe if alot of poeple that have done something tell you its a bad idea, it probably is.

To answer your question....3/8 line is not smaller than stock and no way would it cause enough of a restriction to run the EFI pump without a regulator. I actually believe that the stock lines are only 5/16". If doing away with EFI, you will want to change to an ignition system that isnt controlled by the computer. At the risk of lecturing, thats all I will say on the subject. I will let you run with it from there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Fuel starvation issues, 91 EFI to carb swap. Car dying after 1-3 gallons used. EFI tank, electric fuel pump, bypass regulator. Dual fed carb
  • hassler
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
788
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 12, 2025
nickyb
M
01 mustang 3.8 fuel pressure issue
  • Mhaley2006
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
170
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 29, 2026
Mhaley2006
M
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
157
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
Engine Random Misfire at idle.
  • Gulftown980x
  • Jul 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
214
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2026
squeak93
S
CFI to carb conversion question
  • StockerStang
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
540
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 11, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?