• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

cam gurus help me choose..I'm down to 3!

  • Thread starter Thread starter dbizzay
  • Start date Start date Aug 9, 2005
D

dbizzay

New Member
Apr 14, 2003
88
0
0
Surrey
Aug 9, 2005
#1
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #1
OK, I have my cam selection narrowed down to three. The car is a 1990 coupe, ported E7's, ported stock intake, 65mm TB, 73MM MAF, 5 spd, 3.90 gears.

Comp Cams XE266-HR

Advertised Duration 264/270
Duration @ .050" 212/218
Valve Lift .512/.512
LSA 114 deg

vs

TFS Stage 1

Advertised Duration (Degrees): 275 intake/279 exhaust
Duration at .050 in. Lift (Degrees): 221 intake/225 exhaust
Lift with 1.6 Rocker Arms: .499 in. intake/.510 in. exhaust
Lobe Separation (Degrees): 112

vs

Speed Pro

Advertised duration: 289 intake/289 exhaust
Duration at .050 in. cam lift: 212 intake/222 exhaust
Gross valve lift: .493 in. intake/.510 exhaust
Lobe separation: 112 degrees

Prices are similar on all, only difference is that the XE266HR is used.

Lets here what you guys think

Derek
 
E

emagdnim

Active Member
Feb 5, 2003
391
15
28
Aug 9, 2005
#2
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #2
The comp cams XE266-HR would be the best cam for you imo .
 

Paul Perreca

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,085
0
0
Aug 9, 2005
#3
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #3
just buy the comp cam new - why get a used part that is such a crucial part - even new it cant be more than 225-250 - and how much are you getting it for? If your saying they are similar in price, well the TFS S1 cam goes for about 200 bucks - so whats an extra 25 or 30 bucks?

IMO you should always buy new ****!!!!!!!!!!! I dont trust anybody ever anywhere unless you are on this site and have over 2000 posts lol
Paul Perreca
 

Paul Perreca

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,085
0
0
Aug 9, 2005
#4
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #4
TFS and E cam are very similar, -- actually with your set up, having stock heads (ported) and a mild set up, your best bet would probably be a mild cam, .512 MAY be a little high lift, wait for the gurus of the site to help you -

Example - At atco, guy w/ 5.0 had edelbrock heads and F cam (.512 lift) only had 1.6 roller rockers - car flew - dont know if .512 would be too much

Paul Perreca
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Aug 9, 2005
#5
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #5
I am a fan on split duration cams. Therfore, i would get the stage 1. however, it seems that the speedpro is a slightly more agressive version and might give ya a tad bit more performance.

Paul Perreca said:
Example - At atco, guy w/ 5.0 had edelbrock heads and F cam (.512 lift) only had 1.6 roller rockers - car flew - dont know if .512 would be too much

Paul Perreca
Click to expand...

there is more to a cam than lift. the duration is a big key too. i would NOT worry about using an F cam and stock style heads as long as the P/V clearence was OK. I bet that it would be really strong up to like 5800 rpms (depending on heads/intake).
 
G

gork1rogues

New Member
Oct 2, 2003
42
0
0
Aug 9, 2005
#6
  • Aug 9, 2005
  • #6
Ported heads + TFS1 cam = excellent combo. Great improvement over the stock cam.
 

squeeeg

Founding Member
Jul 4, 2000
1,905
0
0
Michigan
Aug 10, 2005
#7
  • Aug 10, 2005
  • #7
I just installed the TFS stage 1 cam. It actually just started up today and I am really really pleased so that is my choice for you.
 
M

mustang crazy

New Member
Sep 8, 2006
7
0
0
Mar 26, 2007
#8
  • Mar 26, 2007
  • #8
the comp cam xe266hr has .544-.555 the numbers you have posted are the xe264hr not 266
 

ronburgundy

Member
Nov 19, 2006
179
0
16
BC coast
Mar 26, 2007
#9
  • Mar 26, 2007
  • #9
my tfs stage one went in four days ago, and all i can say is yeehaw. nice mean sounding idle too. it also helps that the twisted wedge heads and eddy perf 5.0 went in at the same time.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Mar 26, 2007
#10
  • Mar 26, 2007
  • #10
To be honest, I'd tell you to keep the stock cam until you upgrade your heads/intake. If you do buy one, I'd say go with the TFS-1 if you plan to stick with your current heads/intake for a while. Otherwise, I'd go after the comp grind.

As someone else stated, I'd feel a lot better buying a cam new. Granted, it's really hard to injure a roller cam, but I personally wouldn't take the risk.
 

smittyb

Member
Oct 16, 2005
134
1
19
Marysville,wa
Mar 27, 2007
#11
  • Mar 27, 2007
  • #11
How baot a crane 2031? I picked one up used on here for a pretty good price. Similar set up as yours, and I am pleased.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
871
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
I
289 cam break in help
  • iaff284
  • Aug 19, 2022
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
808
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 19, 2022
iaff284
I
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
791
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
V
pushrod 5.0 (MILD/ Torque) turbo build for an old scout II help
  • vz58
  • Apr 21, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
11
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Jan 21, 2026
Flyboy60
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?