well you have two choices 2750's and 2760's. I would take a look at vt mild n/a cams. if you are staying with the stock heads I think they would be better for you. a little less duration than the 2760's.
yes longtubes are worth it in the "power" department.
I think you can expect 15-20hp. it kind of depends on what you do. cams, plenum, tb and tune could pick you up a solid 30-35hp. that is a good gain. with longtubes you could be in the 270-280hp range.
off course this is my "guestament" based on other peoples results. there is a person I have seen with jba shorties, shm 2760's, other misc mods throwing down like 278hp.
Our stage 1 n/a cams gained 22rwhp (without a retune) on a stock longblock (bullitt intake and longtubes). Our stage2 n/a cams gained 29rwhp on a COMPLETELY stock car (only had flow master mufflers).
Our stage 1 n/a cams gained 22rwhp (without a retune) on a stock longblock (bullitt intake and longtubes). Our stage2 n/a cams gained 29rwhp on a COMPLETELY stock car (only had flow master mufflers).
Our stage 1 n/a cams gained 22rwhp (without a retune) on a stock longblock (bullitt intake and longtubes). Our stage2 n/a cams gained 29rwhp on a COMPLETELY stock car (only had flow master mufflers).
so the stock heads can handle the "bigger" cam so to speak. Is that because of the higher lift with the more mild duration. I have noticed you cams seem to have more lift, less duration, tighter lobe center than say shm. they seem to preform better on the stock heads. I have not seen 2760's net you 29hp on stock heads for example. dammit. now you make me think I should just try cams. I am the worlds worst at making up my damn mind.
So do you think bills car would have actually done better with the wild cams?