• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Cam Question?!?

  • Thread starter Thread starter trav_19
  • Start date Start date Nov 22, 2006

trav_19

New Member
Oct 29, 2006
810
0
0
Jackson, MI
Nov 22, 2006
#1
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #1
I have a bone stock 94 gt its an automatic, ummm only mod is an o/r h pipe and exaust this winter along with cam swap im putting on a flowmaster cat back. Wanting to know the largest cam i can put in it, i will be putting nos on it soon not sure how long after the winter or maybe not at all....what are my options on cams? Wanting a loud big lopeing engine
 

donkey_punch

New Member
Jan 16, 2004
565
0
0
northern****ingjersey
Nov 22, 2006
#2
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #2
your best bet is to call one of the cam companys tech line. like crane or comp etc...

thats going to be a little rough since your using stock heads.

good luck
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 22, 2006
#3
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #3
I certainly can understand how cool a car can sound at idle that has a cam with a good bit of duration

however

That lope at idle don't necessarily make for a quick ride.

A cam like that and your auto trans could make for a very frustrating experience.

Another thing that often goes along with a big cam like that is it can be a turd down low.

I did something like that years ago with stock heads & intake.

It did lope big time

It would not even start to pull until 3200 rpm

I'd do 373's or 410's before doing a cam

If you must do a cam now ... you want to know which heads you are gonna be using for the best results with your cam choice.

Good Luck

Grady
 

MattZ281LE

Founding Member
Feb 6, 2000
345
1
19
Purcellville, Va
Nov 22, 2006
#4
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #4
trav_19 said:
....what are my options on cams? Wanting a loud big lopeing engine
Click to expand...

Pull 1 plug wire off for small duration. 2 for a real lope.

Seriously. A big cam in a stock motor is useless (even a small cam really), less than useless its detrimental...you have no gears and no stall and no flow on the heads and not even an intake.
 

trav_19

New Member
Oct 29, 2006
810
0
0
Jackson, MI
Nov 22, 2006
#5
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #5
final5-0 said:
I certainly can understand how cool a car can sound at idle that has a cam with a good bit of duration

however

That lope at idle don't necessarily make for a quick ride.

A cam like that and your auto trans could make for a very frustrating experience.

Another thing that often goes along with a big cam like that is it can be a turd down low.

I did something like that years ago with stock heads & intake.

It did lope big time

It would not even start to pull until 3200 rpm

I'd do 373's or 410's before doing a cam

If you must do a cam now ... you want to know which heads you are gonna be using for the best results with your cam choice.

Good Luck

Grady
Click to expand...

thanks for the advice i plan on 4:10's soon and im building a 351...slow process right now.. as soon as my engine dies... but i want a good sounding cam i know 94 and 95 are sensitive to cams also what would give me a decent sound.. deeper then stock and ok for now..?

No power till 3200rpms.... haha sounds like a 2v 4.6L engine to me haha
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 22, 2006
#6
  • Nov 22, 2006
  • #6
I have to echo what MattZ281LE said.

ANY CAM
even
a small cam is most likely gonna cause you to be slower

A cam that will produce the sound you are looking for will drive the pcm nuts and with your auto trans ... it will drive you nuts.

You might find a little lope if you decrease the duty cycle of the isc by closing the bleed screw on the throttle body.

btw ... I would not do it
but
if you wanna try ... make a note of the amount you close the screw
because
that would allow you to easily return to the original setting

Easier still ... like was said above ... pull a plug wire or two

Grady
 

trav_19

New Member
Oct 29, 2006
810
0
0
Jackson, MI
Nov 23, 2006
#7
  • Nov 23, 2006
  • #7
..well that sucks i wanted a decent sounding and running stang till my motor puked.... dont wanna dump a lot into this engine trying to but um my other..... guess my only option for this winter are 4:10's and the bottle
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Nov 27, 2006
#8
  • Nov 27, 2006
  • #8
final5-0 said:
You might find a little lope if you decrease the duty cycle of the isc by closing the bleed screw on the throttle body.

btw ... I would not do it
but
if you wanna try ... make a note of the amount you close the screw
because
that would allow you to easily return to the original setting


Grady
Click to expand...

dont happen to have a picture of exactly where that screw is?
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Nov 27, 2006
#9
  • Nov 27, 2006
  • #9
Yeah do 4.10s and the bottle until your new motor is done.
 

drakesdad

Member
Jul 29, 2005
961
0
16
Oregon OHIO
Nov 27, 2006
#10
  • Nov 27, 2006
  • #10
WhiteDevil said:
Yeah do 4.10s and the bottle until your new motor is done.
Click to expand...
agreed.............if your building another engine save the $ for it............hold out until that one is ready.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Nov 27, 2006
#11
  • Nov 27, 2006
  • #11
MattZ281LE said:
Pull 1 plug wire off for small duration. 2 for a real lope.

Seriously. A big cam in a stock motor is useless (even a small cam really), less than useless its detrimental...you have no gears and no stall and no flow on the heads and not even an intake.
Click to expand...
You'd get more hp/tq through the rpm range using long tubes. But for an auto like others have said gears, hell advancing the timing to 14* (have to use premium) would get you a little more umph.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 27, 2006
#12
  • Nov 27, 2006
  • #12
fiveoho said:
dont happen to have a picture of exactly where that screw is?
Click to expand...

Under the rubber plug on the tb

Grady
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Nov 27, 2006
#13
  • Nov 27, 2006
  • #13
1.7rr at most would be all the stock heads will handle, and even then its up in the air. I think you will get more out of the fact they are roller than any addy lift.

Like said several times above waite until you get some heads and match the cam to those heads.
 

trav_19

New Member
Oct 29, 2006
810
0
0
Jackson, MI
Nov 27, 2006
#14
  • Nov 27, 2006
  • #14
if im putting bottle on i shouldn't advance the timing ...right guys????


my throttle body dosent have a screw its like a stud or something no way of turning it my buddy bent the lever that rests on the screw so it held it open more.....i dont recomend this
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Nov 27, 2006
#15
  • Nov 27, 2006
  • #15
There is an allen head screw under the rubber cap by the IAC on the drivers side of the t-body as well.

On the bottle you will want to retard timing...AKA take timing OUT from where you are stock. If you run 14* off the bottle and have no ping for best N/A perf. (many many people do), then for a 125 shot you would want 9-10*. The gen rule is 2* taken out for every 50hp.
 

trav_19

New Member
Oct 29, 2006
810
0
0
Jackson, MI
Nov 27, 2006
#16
  • Nov 27, 2006
  • #16
blksn955.o said:
There is an allen head screw under the rubber cap by the IAC on the drivers side of the t-body as well.

On the bottle you will want to retard timing...AKA take timing OUT from where you are stock. If you run 14* off the bottle and have no ping for best N/A perf. (many many people do), then for a 125 shot you would want 9-10*. The gen rule is 2* taken out for every 50hp.
Click to expand...

ok then i need to retard it 4* because i will be running a 100 shot right.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Nov 27, 2006
#17
  • Nov 27, 2006
  • #17
yep 4* for starters to be safe. If your at the stock 10* at the dizzy you "should" be ok with 10*.
 

trav_19

New Member
Oct 29, 2006
810
0
0
Jackson, MI
Nov 27, 2006
#18
  • Nov 27, 2006
  • #18
ive never touched the timing but who know what the guy before me did i will have to have my buddy shine his light on it:SNSign:
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Nov 28, 2006
#19
  • Nov 28, 2006
  • #19
final5-0 said:
Under the rubber plug on the tb

Grady
Click to expand...


thanks bud
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
My numbers sound right?
  • MiltP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
661
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2026
MiltP
M
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
766
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
G
Quiet my 2015 GT on the cheap
  • gsrblack
  • Feb 12, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
6
Views
715
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Apr 16, 2025
gkomo
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
655
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?