• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Cam specs - what do you think

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cbarton
  • Start date Start date Nov 5, 2004
C

Cbarton

New Member
Feb 27, 2003
176
0
0
Santa Ana, CA
Nov 5, 2004
#1
  • Nov 5, 2004
  • #1
Hey, any comments on the cam my engine builder made for me?

Specs are as follows

Lift @ Valve
intake 574
exhaust 595

Duration @ .004

Intake 298
Exhaust 310

Duration @ .050

Intake 236
Exhaust 248


This is going in a 427W with AFR 225's, 10.5 comp and 4 48idf webers (which should calm the idle quite a bit) Car will be 75% street driven and 25% OT events.

Chris Barton
 
0

03SHKR

Member
Jul 20, 2004
231
0
16
Portland, OR
Nov 5, 2004
#2
  • Nov 5, 2004
  • #2
It's a lot like the cam I have in my sb 427 (see link to 67 below).

I like the cam. It's not real radical. But, it has a nice lope/cam sound.
 

PoliceInterceptor

Keeper Of Automotive Oddities
Founding Member
Aug 5, 1999
2,161
0
46
Live in GA, But could be any where really.
Nov 5, 2004
#3
  • Nov 5, 2004
  • #3
Hydro, Solid, Roller, Hydro Roller?

Sep Angle?
 
C

Cbarton

New Member
Feb 27, 2003
176
0
0
Santa Ana, CA
Nov 5, 2004
#4
  • Nov 5, 2004
  • #4
PoliceInterceptor said:
Hydro, Solid, Roller, Hydro Roller?

Sep Angle?
Click to expand...


Hydraulic roller

110 seperation angle
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Nov 5, 2004
#5
  • Nov 5, 2004
  • #5
Are you sqeezing that beast in the '65?
 
C

Cbarton

New Member
Feb 27, 2003
176
0
0
Santa Ana, CA
Nov 5, 2004
#6
  • Nov 5, 2004
  • #6
66P51GT said:
Are you sqeezing that beast in the '65?
Click to expand...


Yes, but being a 427w (windsor - 351 based) it won't be too tough, I will be using custom headers also which helps a lot.

Chris
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Nov 5, 2004
#7
  • Nov 5, 2004
  • #7
That is a very nice motor. I don't know who your engine builder is,and hate to second guess him, but that type motor will not like a cam made for a 5.0. Edelbrock grinds cams different for a 302 vs a 351. Stroke, rod length, head flow weight of car, purpose, compression, etc, etc, etc all relate to the cam. Don't spend money for top of the line go fast parts, and get a cam designed by some one w/o extensive experience on large stroker sbf's. The cam is no place to skimp.
 
C

Cbarton

New Member
Feb 27, 2003
176
0
0
Santa Ana, CA
Nov 6, 2004
#8
  • Nov 6, 2004
  • #8
Why do you say it's for a 5.0??

Chris



brianj5600 said:
That is a very nice motor. I don't know who your engine builder is,and hate to second guess him, but that type motor will not like a cam made for a 5.0. Edelbrock grinds cams different for a 302 vs a 351. Stroke, rod length, head flow weight of car, purpose, compression, etc, etc, etc all relate to the cam. Don't spend money for top of the line go fast parts, and get a cam designed by some one w/o extensive experience on large stroker sbf's. The cam is no place to skimp.
Click to expand...
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Nov 6, 2004
#9
  • Nov 6, 2004
  • #9
Also sounds like a nice healthy cam for a 427 to me, be it small or big block. Good luck with the Webers, I've heard they can be a bitch to tune. But then again that's what everybody says about the six-pack setup I'm running on my 89 331 stroker Ranger They were easy, and sound awesome. I'll bet the Weber's also have a different sound as well.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Nov 7, 2004
#10
  • Nov 7, 2004
  • #10
Yes, the Webers will be a challange. They need to be "tweeked" just about every time the car is driven based on the barometric pressure.

But when they are working, they provide additional power that can be felt in your butt.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 
C

Cbarton

New Member
Feb 27, 2003
176
0
0
Santa Ana, CA
Nov 8, 2004
#11
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #11
nah, not true. Before I made the purchase I spoke to aprox 6 weber owners and they all said, set them and forget them. The issues are really from people not having them set up correctly in the first place and then chasing their tail....I am lucky to have an expert available (works for Redline/Weber) locally who is going to set them up for me (teach me) on the engine dyno.....plus these are idf's which are less problematic then the ida's that were originally used on the cobras etc. Simular looks better design. (for the street)

Chris


HistoricMustang said:
Yes, the Webers will be a challange. They need to be "tweeked" just about every time the car is driven based on the barometric pressure.

But when they are working, they provide additional power that can be felt in your butt.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
Click to expand...
 
6

'69Stang

Founding Member
Sep 28, 1999
1,130
2
38
Metro Detroit
Nov 8, 2004
#12
  • Nov 8, 2004
  • #12
That is a stout cam for a hyro roller, but the cubes and the Webbers will make ist seem relatively mellow I think. With 225 AFR's why is the cam 12 degrees weighted on the exhaust? I thinkt the intake/exhaust ratio must be near 70%......are you running a 1 3/4" primary header tube to a 2 1/2" exhaust?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
C
What do you think???
  • Clodracer1000
  • Mar 19, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
924
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2018
Steel1
R
  • Locked
SOLD 1964 Weber Carbureted 289 Hipo $10k Firm
  • Robert Campbell
  • Sep 5, 2016
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
1
Views
7K
Engine and Power Adder Sep 17, 2016
Robert Campbell
R
A
  • Locked
Trick Flow Stage 1 cam (Sacramento)
  • A67auto
  • Nov 20, 2010
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
2
Views
5K
Drivetrain Parts Feb 6, 2011
INSANEBA
Cams! (valve event timing, resonance tuning, what's theory, what's fact)
  • FastDriver
  • Oct 27, 2011
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 27, 2011
NIKwoaC
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?