• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

camaro ss wants to race!!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter player4lifeov
  • Start date Start date Oct 5, 2006
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Oct 5, 2006
#21
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #21
Tally_4.6 said:
A couple things...there is more but you get the idea.


SS Performance & Appearance Package

* Includes 325 horsepower, forced air induction hood, specific SS spoiler, high performance ride and handling package, power steering cooler and low restriction dual outlet exhaust.
Click to expand...

The car really didnt gain 15 hp from the Z/28. In fact the SS hood is a shotty design anyways for ram air. Most cars are dynoing very similar dumbers and running similar ET's.
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Oct 5, 2006
#22
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #22
Penguin said:
It was his first time there. His best was around a 9.6 @ 78 something. While my times went from 9.22-9.48. He needed some practice. That won't help you because he has the automatic.
Click to expand...


thats HORRIBLE

i ran a 13.9 my second time at the track with a 9.00 1/8th and that was with a completely stock car
 

Penguin

Active Member
Oct 23, 2003
115
1
28
SC
Oct 5, 2006
#23
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #23
deftsound said:
thats HORRIBLE

i ran a 13.9 my second time at the track with a 9.00 1/8th and that was with a completely stock car
Click to expand...
You think that's bad? I ran an '03 Cobra the same night.
I was ahead of him for a good while.
My 60ft was 2.248 to his 2.406

He ran a 9.02 @ 85 to my 9.4
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Oct 5, 2006
#24
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #24
deftsound said:
thats HORRIBLE

i ran a 13.9 my second time at the track with a 9.00 1/8th and that was with a completely stock car
Click to expand...

thats funny I also ran 13.9 my second time to the track. first time was a pathetic 14.5 if I could have gotten a little better at launching I think I could have gotten stock 13.7's out of it.. Ohh well I will be able to go to the track much more often when I get my 07 next spring.

I know many people loose it on the launch, and it's easy to screw it up with a LS-1 6 speed, I went to the track that day with a guy from work with a 2002 trans am 6 speed and he could not do better than a 14.0 so yeah you can beat a poorly driven one. or if you drive REALLY REALLY good like jackie chan you will beat some average driven ones.

To get as good as jackie is on street tires you need to practice often, learn the skill and go to the track often.. I have a good idea of what I needed to improve to run sub 2.0 60's but sadly my current family situation did not allow me to get to the track enough to practice it.. I went a total of 4 times in 3 years of owning the car
 

TweekedGT

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
1,274
0
0
Alberta
Oct 5, 2006
#25
  • Oct 5, 2006
  • #25
Yikes, you're gonna be in tough. Those SS's run roughly 6-7 tenths faster than the GT's I know of at our track. You better hope he sucks at driving or borrow my car . Race him anyways, you never know what will happen.
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Oct 6, 2006
#26
  • Oct 6, 2006
  • #26
svttech76 said:
thats funny I also ran 13.9 my second time to the track. first time was a pathetic 14.5 if I could have gotten a little better at launching I think I could have gotten stock 13.7's out of it.. Ohh well I will be able to go to the track much more often when I get my 07 next spring.

I know many people loose it on the launch, and it's easy to screw it up with a LS-1 6 speed, I went to the track that day with a guy from work with a 2002 trans am 6 speed and he could not do better than a 14.0 so yeah you can beat a poorly driven one. or if you drive REALLY REALLY good like jackie chan you will beat some average driven ones.

To get as good as jackie is on street tires you need to practice often, learn the skill and go to the track often.. I have a good idea of what I needed to improve to run sub 2.0 60's but sadly my current family situation did not allow me to get to the track enough to practice it.. I went a total of 4 times in 3 years of owning the car
Click to expand...

ok jackie chan is an asian nuff said

sorry us caucasians dont have the same reflexes as asians but i do my best
 

PewterLS1NY

New Member
Mar 6, 2006
1
0
0
Oct 6, 2006
#27
  • Oct 6, 2006
  • #27
The SS do have an advantage over a regular Z28 as far as dragstrip. I ran a few 99+ stangs on the street and killed them but then went to the track and ran 14.0 with cat-back and a shiftkit. The last time at the track I talked with an owner of a 2000 GT vert auto (CAI and exhaust) that ran against in a Test and Tune who ran a 14.1. He was very happy with his time and kinda laughed at my weak 60 ft. Then again having a stall,cam,and 100hp on him gave him more to smile about when I ran a 13.0 on street tires. If I could get the power down it would be alot faster.

I have seen stock LS1 Trans AMs (father and son) autos at my track run 13.5s back to back. I have also seen a totally bone stock but HOOSIER slicked Z28 run a 13.2 and it sounded like a Caddy going down the track.

If his car runs good and you don't hit a good launch I don't think you have enough to get him. Race em.
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Oct 6, 2006
#28
  • Oct 6, 2006
  • #28
How does the SS have the advantage at the strip? I have seen them and Z/28's run within .1-.2 of each other with the races going either way.
 

GoneMad96

New Member
Feb 23, 2004
262
0
0
Cali
Oct 6, 2006
#29
  • Oct 6, 2006
  • #29
tell me when and where i'll smoke um for yea!!!
 

03GTconv

New Member
Feb 15, 2006
49
0
0
Fort Worth
Oct 7, 2006
#30
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #30
Tally_4.6 said:
A couple things...there is more but you get the idea.


SS Performance & Appearance Package

* Includes 325 horsepower, forced air induction hood, specific SS spoiler, high performance ride and handling package, power steering cooler and low restriction dual outlet exhaust.

* Tires: 275/40ZR17 Goodyear Eagle F1

* Wheels: 17" Silver Cast Aluminum

* SS Badging

* SLP 2nd Sticker Content

* Cannot be ordered at a later date. Charges for additional equipment will be invoiced directly from SLP Engineering (please contact SLP Engineering at 248-288-3066 for ordering details, order forms and sales materials).

1LE Suspension Package (SLP)

* Includes double adjustable Koni shocks. Recommended for competition driving.

Includes 5-spoke, SS aluminum wheels with SS logo center cap or Bowtie logo center cap.
Transmission: 6-Speed Manual
Performance Exhaust System (SLP)
3.23 Rear Performance Axle Ratio
Auburn High Torque Performance Differential (SLP)
Click to expand...

The actual Stock LS1 Rates at 345 hp and 350 TQ.....Ill send you guys the lInk. The SLP package actually takes the Engine to 370 HP !!!

I just Traded my GT for a 02 Red and SIlver SS Auto...... Man those things are fast......From what I can tell that thing would have taken me even with all my mods.....and its bone stock
 

03GTconv

New Member
Feb 15, 2006
49
0
0
Fort Worth
Oct 7, 2006
#31
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #31
LS1 generates 345hp at 5600 rpm and 350 lbs/ft. torque at 4400 rpm. Maximum engine speed is 6200 rpm. Compared to the LT4, it generates 15 more horses with peak power 200 rpm lower. It produces 10 more lb/ft. torque with peak torque 100 rpm lower. Chevrolet refused our request for a chart of LS1’s torque curve, but we believe it’s a bit flatter than that of the LT4. All this performance comes from a package weighing 66 pounds less and measuring half-an-inch shorter than a Gen II Small-Block. Some of us still compare today’s power ratings to the gross power figures of the 1960s. If that was still being used, LS1 would put out about 390-400hp. Most notable is that this engine is the first two-valve V8 to reach the one-net-horsepower-per-cubic-inch plateau. That is a monumental engineering achievement.

That paragraph was taken from the following link... I take no credit for the writing or creation. Nor did I alter it in any way..
Also see: http://www.idavette.net/hib/ls1c.html
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Oct 7, 2006
#32
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #32
Actually regular SS is rated at 325hp. The SLP ones can have 335 or 345 all of which are BS ratings anyways as they have been known since 98 to make more power than what they are rated for.
 

PewterLS1NY

New Member
Mar 6, 2006
1
0
0
Oct 7, 2006
#33
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #33
I have driven both with an A4 and the ss was faster. The SS has more power stock then a Z28. .1 or .2 is more like .4 or .5 given all track times i have seen. I have seen some 13.0 out of stock 6spd SS's and 13.4s out of Z28.

Either way you slice it a car with 20hp is going to be faster. I can't wait to hear the outcome of this race.
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Oct 7, 2006
#34
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #34
PewterLS1NY said:
I have driven both with an A4 and the ss was faster. The SS has more power stock then a Z28. .1 or .2 is more like .4 or .5 given all track times i have seen. I have seen some 13.0 out of stock 6spd SS's and 13.4s out of Z28.

Either way you slice it a car with 20hp is going to be faster. I can't wait to hear the outcome of this race.
Click to expand...
Come one dude. I have seen A4 SS's run the same times I did stock and I ran a 13.4 in the heat with my A4. If you really think the SS has that much more hp, you are mistaken. They are within 10 rwhp of each other nothing more.

Yeah you may have seen 13.0's out of an SS, however there have also been 12's from a Z/28(Evan Smith). I have seen stock M6 Z/28's run 13.2-13.3 right along with the SS's so what you have seen is just opinion but not all fact overall.
 
Y

Yellow2002GT

New Member
Feb 20, 2006
148
1
0
Raeford, NC/ FT Bragg
Oct 7, 2006
#35
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #35
Traction is the key! I ran a full bolt on 02 ss auto......only thing he didn't have was a stall! I have all the bolt on's and he ran12.98 @108 to my 13.02 @102.....my 60ft was 1.75 and his was 2.02......but the good thing was...I out R/T'ed him...... .06 to his .21 and beat him by a car! I was about 2-3 cars ahead of him thru the 1/8th and just past the 1/4 he flew by me! Those things have alot of top end! But the ole mustang auto gear ratio is killer compared to their cars! Race him at an 1/8th mile track!

"ED"
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Oct 7, 2006
#36
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #36
Yellow2002GT said:
Traction is the key! I ran a full bolt on 02 ss auto......only thing he didn't have was a stall! I have all the bolt on's and he ran12.98 @108 to my 13.02 @102.....my 60ft was 1.75 and his was 2.02......but the good thing was...I out R/T'ed him...... .06 to his .21 and beat him by a car! I was about 2-3 cars ahead of him thru the 1/8th and just past the 1/4 he flew by me! Those things have alot of top end! But the ole mustang auto gear ratio is killer compared to their cars! Race him at an 1/8th mile track!

"ED"
Click to expand...

You sure he was full bolt ons or a *****ty driver? My old Rooamtes 02 WS6 A4 with a lid and cutout ran 12.87@108. A friends Z/28 A4 with a stall, lid and catback runs 12.7's. A full bolt on A4 should still run alot faster than 12.98
 
A

afterburn

New Member
Apr 18, 2005
46
0
0
Baltimore, MD
Oct 7, 2006
#37
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #37
One of my best friends has a 2000 Camaro SS with a lid, LS6 intake, long tubes, a y pipe, a catback, and 3.73s. He puts down 331 to the rear wheels and runs 13.1 at 111 consistantly.

A driver who can launch better (he's not bad...but I've seen a lot better) and/or drag radials put him solid into the 12s. His only issue is getting traction off the line.

I have seen bad LS1 drivers run 14.0ish...but I've also seen bad New Edge drivers run 15.0ish. So you're only hope of winning is if he can't drive - AT ALL - and you hit everything perfectly.

But even then...he still might win.
 
A

afterburn

New Member
Apr 18, 2005
46
0
0
Baltimore, MD
Oct 7, 2006
#38
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #38
P.S. LS1 F-bodies are very underrated from the factory. Manuals dyno 310 at the wheels stock, +/-.
 

blackfang

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
1,290
1
39
Richmond, Va
Oct 7, 2006
#39
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #39
Not all dyno 310+ just 01-02's tend to do that more often than the 98-00.
 

PewterLS1NY

New Member
Mar 6, 2006
1
0
0
Oct 8, 2006
#40
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #40
bottom line is I would give the kid more a chance with a Z28 then an SS provided both are stock. If you think that within 10rwhp isn't much a difference then you are kidding yourself. I can't wait to see the results of this race.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

S
Bye bye Camaro, Hello Mustang!
  • Swimmatte
  • Jul 2, 2018
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
1K
The Welcome Wagon Jul 2, 2018
Davedacarpainter
Excellent Hagerty Article About The "kings Of The Street"
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Sep 21, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2017
NIKwoaC
  • Locked
Expired Fs: 2003 Ford Mustang Gt/manual/120,000km/dsg
  • DSG03GT
  • May 15, 2016
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
3K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) May 15, 2016
DSG03GT
B
  • Locked
SOLD 1989 Mustang Lx 331 Vortech
  • blackstang5.4
  • May 25, 2014
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
2
Views
3K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 27, 2014
blackstang5.4
B
  • Locked
Pulled on 2010 SS via 125 shot?
  • emu12
  • Sep 25, 2010
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
899
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 25, 2010
Gearbanger 101
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?