• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Cams or Nitrous?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blue46gt
  • Start date Start date Nov 8, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

WhiteDevil69

New Member
Sep 15, 2003
518
0
0
Tucson, AZ
Nov 9, 2004
#21
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #21
djk8705 said:
Id say it all depends are what your final goal for the car is. If you plan to get a blower in the future like a lot of people do, then dont waste your money right now on N/A cams. With n20 you get the good gas mileage when your normal driving, and its not dangerous with a good tune and a window switch. Id hook mine up if I didnt need the money right now..... Also without the "lope" at idle you can surprise the hell outta a lot of people. Also not saying one is better then the other but they are relativly the same cost weather your installing or some1 else is, and when you say the bottle needs filling up, just think of it as the money your saving from having to run 93 gas and burning thru it more often.

-Dan
Click to expand...
uhm, you dont need 93 octane to run cams, N/A cams are not a waste on a blown car, just not as efficient. And your saying if you wanna go with a blower down the road to not get cams, but why would you want the n2o when blown anyways, unless your forged and setup for crazy numbers
 

djk8705

New Member
Sep 30, 2003
154
0
0
Fairfax, Va
Nov 9, 2004
#22
  • Nov 9, 2004
  • #22
WhiteDevil69 said:
uhm, you dont need 93 octane to run cams, N/A cams are not a waste on a blown car, just not as efficient. And your saying if you wanna go with a blower down the road to not get cams, but why would you want the n2o when blown anyways, unless your forged and setup for crazy numbers
Click to expand...


Well first off if your ttrying to get the #'s that N/A cams produce your going to need the 93 for the timing advanced (also meant bout "more gas" b/c ur going to be running at a higher RPM all the time cuz that operating range is higher)..... Also I was referring to the "need to know where your going" maybe that the N/A cams are wrong for his setup and maybe some blower cams... Also I wasnt saying that n20 was the WAY to go. And you can easily take off n20 yourself and have the stock tune reflashed on with a blower.... with cams its obviously not that easy. Also no1 is going to drop the kinda money a blower costs and run the wrong cams .... at least I wouldnt.....


Side note: dont think im tryin to be bias cuz i've got VT N/A II's with comp springs, and the nx kit sitting in my room right now....
 

MartyMoose

Member
Aug 12, 2003
33
0
6
Nov 10, 2004
#23
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #23
Thinking about cams too

I'm also thinking about having cams installed, looking for recommendations. Have heard that Crower cams might be good for my application but haven't heard why. Suggestions please (Crower or otherwise). Thx.

The car is going to remain NA and current mods are:
FIPK II
Steeda UD Pulleys
TransGo shift Kit
3.73:1
MagnaFlow x-pipe & catback
(Diablo Predator should be here this week and possibly upper intake plenum/throttle body soon)
 

RedBullitt

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
462
0
0
Morgantown WV
Nov 11, 2004
#24
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #24
hey all im lookin for cams too, comp cams stage 2 any good or perf 2?
 

nickthegenius

Active Member
Dec 23, 2002
1,631
1
38
Elwood, IN
Nov 11, 2004
#25
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #25
OK, I don't claim to know all, but I can share what I have learned over the last few months when I was researching cams before installing them in April. And I still keep up on cam tech at Modular Depot where about 50% of the 2V guys are cammed or so it seems.

For nitrous, pick out a good set of N/A cams. For the level of nitrous any of us are going to see, we do not need a "nitrous-specific" cam. Comp and VT both have cams that would work great (Comp 262s and 270s or VT Stage I or IIs). I really don't know much about the Crower stuff. I am sure they are good, but there aren't many people running them yet.

Now don't get too disappointed if you think you might go s/c down the road and think you MUST swap cams again. The Comp 270s are actually supposed to be pretty good as a blower cam. Of all people, one of the VT guys that posts on MD stated that. Not as good as a blower grind, but they will still provide a nice gain with a s/c.

Now as far as my setup, I have an '03 with stock heads, stock intake, LTs, o/r X-pipe, pullies, upper plenum, 75mm TB, Steeda CAI, and Comp 270s. I took my car to a local tuner who told me up front that he hadn't done a (or very many) cammed 2v at that point in time. I still question the tune sometimes, but it put down 290hp @ 5580 and 301tq@4000. The car is very docile even with the lopey idle. It drives just like a stock car except for the slight problems that I am currently blaming on the tune after cold start-up.

Back to the original topic, I would get the cams first. Learn how to harness the new-found power at the track and have fun with it. Then, when you need an extra boost down the road, go for the nitrous. Thats my opinion

One last thing, I feel that there are two things holding me back at this point:

- 3.73 gears
- 6250 redline (needs to be 6500 to allow 6400rpm shifts)
 
B

BVille99GT

Member
May 1, 2003
283
0
16
Brownsville TX.
Nov 11, 2004
#26
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #26
nickthegenius said:
OK, I don't claim to know all, but I can share what I have learned over the last few months when I was researching cams before installing them in April. And I still keep up on cam tech at Modular Depot where about 50% of the 2V guys are cammed or so it seems.

For nitrous, pick out a good set of N/A cams. For the level of nitrous any of us are going to see, we do not need a "nitrous-specific" cam. Comp and VT both have cams that would work great (Comp 262s and 270s or VT Stage I or IIs). I really don't know much about the Crower stuff. I am sure they are good, but there aren't many people running them yet.

Now don't get too disappointed if you think you might go s/c down the road and think you MUST swap cams again. The Comp 270s are actually supposed to be pretty good as a blower cam. Of all people, one of the VT guys that posts on MD stated that. Not as good as a blower grind, but they will still provide a nice gain with a s/c.

Now as far as my setup, I have an '03 with stock heads, stock intake, LTs, o/r X-pipe, pullies, upper plenum, 75mm TB, Steeda CAI, and Comp 270s. I took my car to a local tuner who told me up front that he hadn't done a (or very many) cammed 2v at that point in time. I still question the tune sometimes, but it put down 290hp @ 5580 and 301tq@4000. The car is very docile even with the lopey idle. It drives just like a stock car except for the slight problems that I am currently blaming on the tune after cold start-up.

Back to the original topic, I would get the cams first. Learn how to harness the new-found power at the track and have fun with it. Then, when you need an extra boost down the road, go for the nitrous. Thats my opinion

One last thing, I feel that there are two things holding me back at this point:

- 3.73 gears
- 6250 redline (needs to be 6500 to allow 6400rpm shifts)
Click to expand...

I have being researching over at MD about cams and nitrous. I currently have 100shot on the car and I'm switching to a Noszle kit (is in the garage), and think that some cams(st.II)/JBA headers/SCT (MD tune) will be nice for a short term goals.
 

Red35th

Member
Apr 18, 2003
609
2
19
Houston, TX
Nov 12, 2004
#27
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #27
High 13s or mid 12s?

That about sums it up...

I went from getting killed by LS1s to hanging with stock 03 Cobras. I am happy with my choice.

Edit: Forgot to add that I just bought an NX bottle opener, so I do have the power whenever I want it.
 
6

'69Stang

Founding Member
Sep 28, 1999
1,130
2
38
Metro Detroit
Nov 12, 2004
#28
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #28
nickthegenius said:
OK, I don't claim to know all, but I can share what I have learned over the last few months when I was researching cams before installing them in April. And I still keep up on cam tech at Modular Depot where about 50% of the 2V guys are cammed or so it seems.

For nitrous, pick out a good set of N/A cams. For the level of nitrous any of us are going to see, we do not need a "nitrous-specific" cam. Comp and VT both have cams that would work great (Comp 262s and 270s or VT Stage I or IIs). I really don't know much about the Crower stuff. I am sure they are good, but there aren't many people running them yet.

Now don't get too disappointed if you think you might go s/c down the road and think you MUST swap cams again. The Comp 270s are actually supposed to be pretty good as a blower cam. Of all people, one of the VT guys that posts on MD stated that. Not as good as a blower grind, but they will still provide a nice gain with a s/c.

Now as far as my setup, I have an '03 with stock heads, stock intake, LTs, o/r X-pipe, pullies, upper plenum, 75mm TB, Steeda CAI, and Comp 270s. I took my car to a local tuner who told me up front that he hadn't done a (or very many) cammed 2v at that point in time. I still question the tune sometimes, but it put down 290hp @ 5580 and 301tq@4000. The car is very docile even with the lopey idle. It drives just like a stock car except for the slight problems that I am currently blaming on the tune after cold start-up.

Back to the original topic, I would get the cams first. Learn how to harness the new-found power at the track and have fun with it. Then, when you need an extra boost down the road, go for the nitrous. Thats my opinion

One last thing, I feel that there are two things holding me back at this point:

- 3.73 gears
- 6250 redline (needs to be 6500 to allow 6400rpm shifts)
Click to expand...

I was curious about your cam spec's. I am familiar with the Comp Cams XE270AH which has spec's of 234/238 @ .050 .550/.550 lift and 113 LSA, but have never heard of the 270s.....what cam is this, what are the spec's, and do you think it is a good daily driver cam? Something that seems relatively stock? Thanks for any insight.
 

nickthegenius

Active Member
Dec 23, 2002
1,631
1
38
Elwood, IN
Nov 12, 2004
#29
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #29
[QUOTE='69Stang]I was curious about your cam spec's. I am familiar with the Comp Cams XE270AH which has spec's of 234/238 @ .050 .550/.550 lift and 113 LSA, but have never heard of the 270s.....what cam is this, what are the spec's, and do you think it is a good daily driver cam? Something that seems relatively stock? Thanks for any insight.[/QUOTE]

Sorry for the confusion, but thats just the short version. They are XE270AHs. When talking about them on Modular Depot, I'm just used to abbreviating the name.

And it could easily be a daily driver. Nothing wrong with the way the car drives other than a couple minor tuning issues which are not the cams fault. The VT Stage I might suit you better though if you want to get something a little milder. Bill Putnam (Mustang92) did a write up a while back on here and on Modular Depot and he gained 22RWHP with the installation of VT Stage 1s.
 

WhiteDevil69

New Member
Sep 15, 2003
518
0
0
Tucson, AZ
Nov 12, 2004
#30
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #30
nickthegenius said:
Sorry for the confusion, but thats just the short version. They are XE270AHs. When talking about them on Modular Depot, I'm just used to abbreviating the name.

And it could easily be a daily driver. Nothing wrong with the way the car drives other than a couple minor tuning issues which are not the cams fault. The VT Stage I might suit you better though if you want to get something a little milder. Bill Putnam (Mustang92) did a write up a while back on here and on Modular Depot and he gained 22RWHP with the installation of VT Stage 1s.
Click to expand...
Now stage I from both brands are supposed to work without a spring upgrade, correct? I would much prefer to avoid the spring swap if at all possible.
 
6

'69Stang

Founding Member
Sep 28, 1999
1,130
2
38
Metro Detroit
Nov 12, 2004
#31
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #31
nickthegenius said:
Sorry for the confusion, but thats just the short version. They are XE270AHs. When talking about them on Modular Depot, I'm just used to abbreviating the name.

And it could easily be a daily driver. Nothing wrong with the way the car drives other than a couple minor tuning issues which are not the cams fault. The VT Stage I might suit you better though if you want to get something a little milder. Bill Putnam (Mustang92) did a write up a while back on here and on Modular Depot and he gained 22RWHP with the installation of VT Stage 1s.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the clarification. Well, if VT 1 cams add 22 RWHP I wonder what the 270s would add......they are a much more aggresive grind. Any idea?
 

WhiteDevil69

New Member
Sep 15, 2003
518
0
0
Tucson, AZ
Nov 12, 2004
#32
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #32
[QUOTE='69Stang]Thanks for the clarification. Well, if VT 1 cams add 22 RWHP I wonder what the 270s would add......they are a much more aggresive grind. Any idea?[/QUOTE]
30-35ish typically. when N/A they have almost identical gains to the VT stage 2's, which is usually that much.
 

kurst

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2001
764
0
0
New Orleans, LA
Nov 12, 2004
#33
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #33
I agree that it depends on use.

However, I would personally go with nitrous. As stated above, people seem to think power gains are somewhat similar. This is simply not true, look at the dyno #'s on anybody with a decent tune and running 100 shot(which is considered quite safe for our cars)

cams-30rwhp, probably similar torque #s
nitrous-at least 100rwp, and usually 150rwtq

basically cams are going to be a bump in power, whereas nitrous will make your car perform above it's class.
 
B

BVille99GT

Member
May 1, 2003
283
0
16
Brownsville TX.
Nov 12, 2004
#34
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #34
Yeah with nitrous torque will be up high, I seen some untune cars with torque figures of 500rwtq. But I know from first hand that the bottle goes on empty fast, I street races at least 3-4 times a week (no counting highway battles). I would like to have the power that the cams offer, and still have my nitrous for the big dogs. My $0.02
 

nickthegenius

Active Member
Dec 23, 2002
1,631
1
38
Elwood, IN
Nov 12, 2004
#35
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #35
Red35th said:
High 13s or mid 12s?

That about sums it up...
Click to expand...

We could argue about this stuff for weeks. Please don't take this as a knock against your car, but the times are pretty darn close.

Me w/cams = 12.9@105.59
You w/nitrous= 12.83@111

You're clearly making more power from the MPH, but the times themselves aren't that far apart
 
B

blue46gt

New Member
Mar 13, 2004
53
0
0
WA
Nov 12, 2004
#36
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #36
Wow, this turned out to be a really great thread! I'm going to go with cams first. I think I'll go with Comp Cams. I'm looking at a catalog and I see the 270's but what are the 278's? I know I have to get a spring kit with either of these but what other things do I have to do to make the cams work right? Thanks again guys for all the help!!
 

nickthegenius

Active Member
Dec 23, 2002
1,631
1
38
Elwood, IN
Nov 12, 2004
#37
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #37
blue46gt said:
Wow, this turned out to be a really great thread! I'm going to go with cams first. I think I'll go with Comp Cams. I'm looking at a catalog and I see the 270's but what are the 278's? I know I have to get a spring kit with either of these but what other things do I have to do to make the cams work right? Thanks again guys for all the help!!
Click to expand...

NO!!!! Do not get the XE278AHs. Those will require having notches machined into your pistons to prevent piston-to-valve clearance problems.

A quick list of things you will need:

- This write-up for instructions http://www.modulardepot.com/articles.php?aid=39
- Cams
- Springs
- valve cover gaskets
- front cover gaskets
- RTV silicone (black)
* OTC valve spring tool http://www.thetoolwarehouse.net/shop/OTC-7928.html
- New cam bolts (Comps should have them in the box, but this seems to be hit and miss)

Then, once it is buttoned back up take it to a dyno tuner if you have one nearby. If not, have someone reputable like Modular Depot or T&J do a mail-order chip. Both of those shops have done enough cars that they should have a tune on file that will get you VERY close to perfect.
 
B

blue46gt

New Member
Mar 13, 2004
53
0
0
WA
Nov 12, 2004
#38
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #38
Thanks for the help! Now I just have to get a little more money together. Thanks again
 

Go HoTO!

New Member
Apr 11, 2004
602
0
0
Mountaintop, PA
Nov 13, 2004
#39
  • Nov 13, 2004
  • #39
I debated cams vs nitrous and decided on nitrous...sure I can always add cams later.

Cams are a bitch to install and I knew the job would be tough for me. $600 for cams plus $700 for labor (this is what I was quoted) and then paying for a dyno tune which you NEED with stage II cams and should get with stage I's if possible. In the end, I decided this was WAY too much $ for 30 hp.

Also, if I was to do cams, might as well do heads at the same time because the labor charge was the exact same. So heads added another $1500+ to the job. Don't get me wrong, these are good mods, jut more than I wanted to spend and I like to do things right.

So, I went with nitrous and purchased a Venom-1000 for $560 shipped. Great setup, safe, and a cheap way to add 100+ hp. Now, I have driven the car with the 25 - 35 shot and you can feel the added power. But, I would have been really pissed if I had spent all that money on cams and that was all I got....just a thought.

Bottle fills suck, however.
 

mcmmotorsports

Member
Apr 12, 2004
689
0
17
Danbury, CT
Nov 13, 2004
#40
  • Nov 13, 2004
  • #40
Go HoTO! said:
Bottle fills suck, however.
Click to expand...
Just get a bigger bottle
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
589
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
164
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
M
4.10 gears = 200,000 miles ?
  • michaelleewebb
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
181
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Apr 2, 2026
michaelleewebb
M
Opinions on a possible project car w/ pics
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
10
Views
198
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Mar 30, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
882
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?