• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Cams - Valve/Piston spacing

  • Thread starter Thread starter 53BigDog
  • Start date Start date Mar 8, 2008

53BigDog

Active Member
May 22, 2001
2,331
0
47
Palm Harbor, FL
Mar 8, 2008
#1
  • Mar 8, 2008
  • #1
I have a 97 GT naturally aspriated with PI Heads and I am planning putting in flat top head pistons with no relief valves inlets. I am trying to decided between Comp Cams XE268H (part # 102200) or XE270AH (part #102600). The major difference between these two cams are the valve lift. The XE268H's have a valve lift of .500 which is more similar to the non-PI stock. The XE270AH's have a .550 lift and I am concerned whether or not I will need clearance or valve reliefs in my pistons.

Anyone able to answer?
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Mar 8, 2008
#2
  • Mar 8, 2008
  • #2
Unless im mistaken you already have flat top pistons stock. 268H's are designed for NPI heads, hence less lift. I dont think you'll have a problem with 270AH's as long as you degree them
 

53BigDog

Active Member
May 22, 2001
2,331
0
47
Palm Harbor, FL
Mar 8, 2008
#3
  • Mar 8, 2008
  • #3
no, my stock pistons are dished ??
 
R

rugster

New Member
Aug 31, 2004
156
0
0
Mar 9, 2008
#4
  • Mar 9, 2008
  • #4
NPI pistons do not have a dish, thats why those motors are higher compression than PI motors.
 

CobraRed_96_GT

Active Member
May 20, 2006
1,421
4
39
UCSD/La Jolla
Mar 9, 2008
#5
  • Mar 9, 2008
  • #5
rugster said:
NPI pistons do not have a dish, thats why those motors are higher compression than PI motors.
Click to expand...

96-’98 Non-PI Heads have a 49.77cc combustion chamber and the pistons have a .153cc dish relief.

’99-’04 PI Heads have a 42.45cc combustion chamber and the pistons have a deeper dish at .188cc dish relief.



guess i'd stick with a .500 lift over a .550 then
 
J

Jim@CMS

New Member
Jan 5, 2008
23
0
0
Mar 9, 2008
#6
  • Mar 9, 2008
  • #6
The 270 will be scary close....if it clears at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Does anyone else have a combo close to this
  • 90Stanger302
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
236
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 25, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Valve hitting piston?
  • krazedstang
  • Jun 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
205
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 12, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
714
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
R
351w stroked to 408 CARB
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
637
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2025
General karthief
Fox 89’ GT 331 stroker, Trickflow upper/lower, TF#3 Cam, stuffed with forged goodies.
  • 08GT500
  • Nov 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
734
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 6, 2025
08GT500
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?