• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Cams What should I do?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 11sec.
  • Start date Start date Jan 7, 2011

11sec.

Member
Mar 20, 2006
39
0
7
Lincoln, Ne
Jan 7, 2011
#1
  • Jan 7, 2011
  • #1
Well Im thinking about getting some cams for my 01 GT. I have nitrous now with a stock motor but its not enough!!! HAHA Imagine That!!!! Anywayz i was wanting some help figuring out what to go with with out having to do anything to my heads and valves and pistons? I know ill have to get it tuned but thats not a big deal!!! I just want it to sound mean at idal and have it perform alittle better. Please help me out id appreciate it THANKS
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Jan 8, 2011
#2
  • Jan 8, 2011
  • #2
Look into Modular Headshop's nitrous cam. Its a great cam for when you aren't spraying and a beast when you do. Im not entirely sure but I think that they do not require upgraded springs.
 
I

IHeartMikeVick

New Member
Dec 23, 2010
5
0
0
Jan 8, 2011
#3
  • Jan 8, 2011
  • #3
When my time comes for cams, I am considering Anderson Ford Motorsport! They have an option for pretty much any setup.

Anderson Camshafts
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Jan 8, 2011
#4
  • Jan 8, 2011
  • #4
Just remember that bigger is not always better when it comes to cams, especially on small-displacement engines like the 4.6 (281 cubic inches) that are hurting for torque already.

Big cams move the powerband up in the RPM band. If you don't do valve springs and don't do anything to strengthen the bottom end, you'll still be limited to a safe value of ~6000RPM and thus the power gain potential available from big cams is basically lost. And while the power band is moving up, torque is often lost down low, again, not a good thing on a small-inch motor already disadvantaged in this area.

For a stock motor on stock springs a "Stg 1" cam is a good bet. I've got Comp 262AHs on mine and when normally aspirated the car picked up ~25HP near redline without losing anything down low. There's a slight idle with them too, if that matters to you.

If you're in it for a lumpy idle I can't help much except suggest that, since you're going to need an aggressive cam, you upgrade the springs too.
 

trombonedemon

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2009
1,962
39
59
U.S.A, U.S.A., U.S.A.!
Jan 8, 2011
#5
  • Jan 8, 2011
  • #5
Correct me if I am wrong, but, while your in there, go ahead and up grade to some higher quality springs and lifters. Don't you have to take the springs and lifters out for a cam change anyway?
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Jan 8, 2011
#6
  • Jan 8, 2011
  • #6
trombonedemon said:
Correct me if I am wrong, but, while your in there, go ahead and up grade to some higher quality springs and lifters. Don't you have to take the springs and lifters out for a cam change anyway?
Click to expand...

Springs are completely dependent on the size of the cam and how high you're going to turn the motor RPM wise. On a small cam, often times stock springs are best because of their pressure ratings. Springs don't need to be removed in order to just remove/install cams.

Overhead cam engines don't use a traditional lifter setup like a pushrod engine. The lifters are more often called followers in an OHC setup, and don't need to be removed either to remove/install cams. The stock pieces are pretty stout from what I've seen. Ford did their homework for the valvetrain in their SOHC/DOHC mod motors.
 

trombonedemon

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2009
1,962
39
59
U.S.A, U.S.A., U.S.A.!
Jan 8, 2011
#7
  • Jan 8, 2011
  • #7
BurningRubber said:
Springs are completely dependent on the size of the cam and how high you're going to turn the motor RPM wise. On a small cam, often times stock springs are best because of their pressure ratings. Springs don't need to be removed in order to just remove/install cams.

Overhead cam engines don't use a traditional lifter setup like a pushrod engine. The lifters are more often called followers in an OHC setup, and don't need to be removed either to remove/install cams. The stock pieces are pretty stout from what I've seen. Ford did their homework for the valvetrain in their SOHC/DOHC mod motors.
Click to expand...

, I was wondering if these mod motors get valve float, thus me supporting upgrading the springs, so how hard would a cam install be w/o removal of springs/followers. Could a home mechanic do the job/install in a day?
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Jan 8, 2011
#8
  • Jan 8, 2011
  • #8
Just to clarify: the "followers" in these engines are akin to the rocker arms in a pushrod engine and do have to be removed when changing the cams. They just pop out. The "lifter" is what's different. While the OHC engines do have the same functional part (i.e. a hydraulic lash adjuster), they don't operate in the same geometry as the "lifter" in a pushrod engine and don't have to be removed.
 

11sec.

Member
Mar 20, 2006
39
0
7
Lincoln, Ne
Jan 9, 2011
#9
  • Jan 9, 2011
  • #9
Well Ive heard from some ppl that everything will clear even with a stage 3 cam and others say the S292 will have PTV probs.....So I just wanted to make sure also if anybody has any videos of there different cam sounds fill free to send them to me thanks!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Engine Coolant leak from oil filter
  • jr273
  • Mar 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
217
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 31, 2026
squeak93
T
First Car, what should I do for power??
  • tunedV6
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
221
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
580HP*428Cj
5
D
Fox won't crank over and fuel pump won't kick on.
  • djj62478
  • Jun 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
257
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2026
General karthief
S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
53
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
SophiaTatum
S
9
Does anyone else have a combo close to this
  • 90Stanger302
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
237
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 25, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?