• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Camshaft break in prior to setting timing on rebuilt 289?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ks65stang
  • Start date Start date Nov 14, 2012
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
K

ks65stang

Member
Nov 4, 2002
184
0
17
Kansas City Metro, Lenexa
Nov 14, 2012
#1
  • Nov 14, 2012
  • #1
I'm getting ready to start my rebuilt 289 for the 1st time later this week or weekend.

I plan to set the 1# piston and TDC and then back off to 12 degrees before TDC on the balancer, prime the oiling system w/ a oil priming rod and a drill, then drop in my distributer pointing the rotor at #1 cylinder, then twist the dizzy till I can visually see my dizzy cap and rotor lining up on #1. Start the engine and follow the break in instructions that came with my cam. After this is complete this I will set timing exactly at 12 degrees before TDC.

Does this sound right and should I be able to visually get everything set close enough to run for the break-in or should I time 1st thing after starting?

Thanks in advance!!!
 

Fstbk

Member
Sep 7, 2010
215
2
19
Nov 14, 2012
#2
  • Nov 14, 2012
  • #2
It sounds like you have given this a lot of thought and you should be fine. FWIW All I did was point the distributor to where it usually is and went for it. Its not like you are going to be at idle or anything so its just gotta be close enough to run at high enough RPM to break in.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Nov 14, 2012
#3
  • Nov 14, 2012
  • #3
sounds good to me.
 
K

ks65stang

Member
Nov 4, 2002
184
0
17
Kansas City Metro, Lenexa
Nov 16, 2012
#4
  • Nov 16, 2012
  • #4
Ok, I will start this weekend, just put headers back on last night.
 

Fstbk

Member
Sep 7, 2010
215
2
19
Nov 16, 2012
#5
  • Nov 16, 2012
  • #5
Did you coat the cam well and did you use a good oil additive for break in? Be sure you do!
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Nov 17, 2012
#6
  • Nov 17, 2012
  • #6
Another new-engine start-up tip that works well for me is to pre-fill the carb. I use a little squirt bottle I stole from my wife's kitchen and use it to fill the carb's vent tube with gas. The vent tube pours it into the bowls, so fill it a bit, pump the linkage by hand until you see it squirt into the engine and your ready to try to fire it. Grinding on the starter waiting for a mechanical pump to fill the carb doesn't do a new cam any good.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Nov 17, 2012
#7
  • Nov 17, 2012
  • #7
zookeeper said:
Another new-engine start-up tip that works well for me is to pre-fill the carb. I use a little squirt bottle I stole from my wife's kitchen and use it to fill the carb's vent tube with gas. The vent tube pours it into the bowls, so fill it a bit, pump the linkage by hand until you see it squirt into the engine and your ready to try to fire it. Grinding on the starter waiting for a mechanical pump to fill the carb doesn't do a new cam any good.
Click to expand...

excellent point that is often overlooked.
 
K

ks65stang

Member
Nov 4, 2002
184
0
17
Kansas City Metro, Lenexa
Nov 18, 2012
#8
  • Nov 18, 2012
  • #8
Well, I had wiring issues, my engine harness is shot. So I rigged it and only cranked the un-broken-in engine for about a total of a minute during the trouble shooting process till she started. I did lube the cam w/ the lube in came w/ and, used a name brand oil w/ a break in additive, pre-filled the carb w/ fuel and primed the oiling system prior to starting. I also ran a fan in front of the radiator while running and during cool down.

If you are reading this and doing this yourself have a garden hose near w/ the water on. I did and good, beacuse I had two fires, one from a rag on top of my jack stand supporting the frame (close to headers) and other was a spark plug boot. I sprayed the rag out but had the shut the engine down for the plug boot.

During the 1st run, it ran never below 1500 RPM and fluctuated the RPM often (per cam directions). I was able to run about 10 minutes before the passenger, #3 boot caught on fire (it was setting right on the header). During this run the engine put out blue smoke during the first 7-8 minutes and then just all a sudden she ran clean, the rings seated!!! The passenger side bank headers did get semi red hot. I did some reading and discovered this could be due to timing, fuel mixture and/or vacuum leak.

So a very nervous me pressed on and wrapped the #3 plug in header wrap and ran a second run for 32 minutes, never below 1500 RPM and fluctuated the RPM often (per cam directions). Passenger bank did get hot again and one tube on the drivers side bank got a little hot. This has to be a timing issue for sure as I just got the timing semi-close by eye and ran with it. After 32 minutes I let it idle at 800RPM, pretty rough due to the timing, tune and new cam profile, but I considered yesterday a sucess, nothing broke, popped, leaked and seem to go as planned.

Now I need to order a new wiring harness and plug wires and tune next week.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Nov 18, 2012
#9
  • Nov 18, 2012
  • #9
sounds like you had a successful break in period.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Nov 18, 2012
#10
  • Nov 18, 2012
  • #10
Just out of curiosity, what brand of cam did you use? What oil and break in lube? Keep your eyes on the oil for a few days, just to make sure nothing shiny shows up.
 
K

ks65stang

Member
Nov 4, 2002
184
0
17
Kansas City Metro, Lenexa
Nov 19, 2012
#11
  • Nov 19, 2012
  • #11
My setup is a 65 289 block, bored .040" over, flat top pistons, stock rods and a freshly turned stock crank, summit knock off of the Performer cam (Sum-3600), Performer intake w/ a 600 CFM Edelbrock carb, rebuilt GT40 heads from 93 Cobra w/ Scorpion Pedestal Mount roller rockers and hooker headers.

Used Lucas oil additive.

Think I will hit the 300+ horse power mark? That is my goal and to still maintain drivability.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Nov 20, 2012
#12
  • Nov 20, 2012
  • #12
I would think 300 at the wheel fairly easy. I have a similar set up in my 68. I've had bad luck with oils, or just ty Edelbrock camshafts, one of the two, as I'm now on my 3rd cam. This time I used Joe Gibbs break in oil. And now for some reason, when the engine warms up, I only have 20 lbs of oil pressure....
 

72 fastback

Member
Apr 4, 2006
146
3
19
Hamden Ct
Nov 24, 2012
#13
  • Nov 24, 2012
  • #13
woodsnake said:
I would think 300 at the wheel fairly easy. I have a similar set up in my 68. I've had bad luck with oils, or just ****ty Edelbrock camshafts, one of the two, as I'm now on my 3rd cam. This time I used Joe Gibbs break in oil. And now for some reason, when the engine warms up, I only have 20 lbs of oil pressure....
Click to expand...
Having only 20 psi at idle on a small block ford is unusual. I woild check it with another guage to be sure.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Nov 24, 2012
#14
  • Nov 24, 2012
  • #14
Also, don't think just because your sending unit may be new that it's good. Last year my nearly new 306 dropped it's oil pressure during startup. It went to zero so I shut it off. I did some preliminary checks and found nothing so I bought a new sending unit and sure enough, even though it had less than 1000 miles on it, the sending unit was toast. No problems since then, but it is good peace of mind to see the gauge go up where it's supposed to.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Nov 25, 2012
#15
  • Nov 25, 2012
  • #15
My fear, is that when the last lobe failed, somehow I got material somewhere it isn't supposed to be. I am in NY for the next few months, and so will have to wait until I get back to Colorado to diagnose further. I would be a very happy camper if it were only a bad gauge, and that I don't have to polish the crank and get new bearings! The engine only has around 3500 miles on it.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Nov 25, 2012
#16
  • Nov 25, 2012
  • #16
Here's a link to a similar build for power estimate. GT40p's are comparable to slightly better than GT40s. This guy made 287 at the wheels with untouched GT40ps and slightly over 300 at the wheels with heads that had some cleanup work. Of course all the details matter such as compression ratio, cam details, etc. He's probably running a roller lifter camshaft which I would expect to make a little more power than your flat tappet. Also, he has a T5 and you're running a C4. The automatic will soak up a little more power than a manual would. Same with an 8.8 vs. a 9 inch rear. His EFI tuning will be pretty accurate and it's hard to get a carb that right on, so if you don't spend time working on getting the carb just right that will also drop your numbers down a little. I would expect your power at the wheels could be anywhere between 200 and 320 depending on how good the air and if it's a happy dyno, etc.
http://forums.corral.net/forums/5-0-5-8-engine-tech/1394532-gt40p-gt40x-gain.html
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Nov 25, 2012
#17
  • Nov 25, 2012
  • #17
woodsnake said:
My fear, is that when the last lobe failed, somehow I got material somewhere it isn't supposed to be. I am in NY for the next few months, and so will have to wait until I get back to Colorado to diagnose further. I would be a very happy camper if it were only a bad gauge, and that I don't have to polish the crank and get new bearings! The engine only has around 3500 miles on it.
Click to expand...
Yeah if you trashed a cam and didn't tear everything down you had some metal fragments migrating around through the engine. That could have toasted the bearings.
 
K

ks65stang

Member
Nov 4, 2002
184
0
17
Kansas City Metro, Lenexa
Dec 7, 2012
#18
  • Dec 7, 2012
  • #18
I fixed my wiring issue thanks to you guys here on Stangnet.

I set the timing to 12 degrees before tdc and the engine started running much smoother. I also swapped the coil to a Summit knock off performance coil.

Engine still got pretty hot and spit some coolant, but it maybe overfilled and I do need an overflow tank. Not too worried about the heat issue. The header tubes heat temp per my laser thermometer were between 300-500, some tubes had a 200 degree difference? Im guessing this is due to intake runner length and feul / air mixture.

Also im running stock 93 mustang plugs with a large gap vs. stock 65 plug gap?

I plan to change the oil (total of 1 hour on the break in oil), get my Mustang Steve cluch cable set up and do my alignment (just did Arning drop) and will post more tuning updates.....

Thanks for all your help!
 

Fstbk

Member
Sep 7, 2010
215
2
19
Dec 7, 2012
#19
  • Dec 7, 2012
  • #19
These cars will pule coolant since they do not have an over flow tank, they sorta find center on their own. I was going to add an overflow, but it would look out of place under my hood since it looks "Stockish" and restored.
 

bartl

Active Member
Feb 4, 2001
218
8
29
West Rutland, Vermont
Dec 9, 2012
#20
  • Dec 9, 2012
  • #20
ks65stang said:
I fixed my wiring issue thanks to you guys here on Stangnet.

I set the timing to 12 degrees before tdc and the engine started running much smoother. I also swapped the coil to a Summit knock off performance coil.

Engine still got pretty hot and spit some coolant, but it maybe overfilled and I do need an overflow tank. Not too worried about the heat issue. The header tubes heat temp per my laser thermometer were between 300-500, some tubes had a 200 degree difference? Im guessing this is due to intake runner length and feul / air mixture.

Also im running stock 93 mustang plugs with a large gap vs. stock 65 plug gap?

I plan to change the oil (total of 1 hour on the break in oil), get my Mustang Steve cluch cable set up and do my alignment (just did Arning drop) and will post more tuning updates.....

Thanks for all your help!
Click to expand...

If you're measuring temp close to the exhaust port it should be fairly consistent. Would suspect one side of the carb is running rich/lean as opposed to the others or a vacuum leak. If you're not running a HEI ignition system I'd keep the plug gap at .045" or less.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Resolved Weird sound coming from a freshly rebuilt 5.0L
  • karhoot
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
212
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 27, 2026
Mac131
Distributor installed wrong
  • djj62478
  • Jun 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
212
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
G
Help with initial Microsquirt ignition setting
  • germain101
  • Nov 13, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
3
Views
581
Digital Self-tuning Forum Nov 15, 2025
Mustang5L5
S
Timing chain, guides and tensioner installation (Possible orientation in Intake Stroke)
  • StallionMax
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
401
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
StallionMax
S
B
Engine Another no start after washing engine bay
  • bruno
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
738
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?