• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Can any one identify this transmission?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bob Byrd
  • Start date Start date Dec 11, 2003
B

Bob Byrd

New Member
Nov 16, 2002
10
0
0
Outerbanks, NC
Dec 11, 2003
#1
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #1
I pulled this transmission off a fuel injected 2.3 mustang. ID tag reads 78ET BA FO 6H 22G. It is a four speed manual. Would like to know what years of Mustang it will fit. Thanks and happy holidays. Bob
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Dec 11, 2003
#2
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #2
That is very unssual. The EFI mustang started in 87, and they all got the T5 which is a 5 sp manual. If it is indeed a 4sp manual, I would guess it is the SROD. They came on earlier manual 2.3's I beleive (which were all carb or carb feedback).
 

MSM0075

Member
May 13, 2003
741
0
16
Central Jersey
Dec 11, 2003
#3
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #3
intresting to find that in a Fuel Injected car..

Late '83GT models were converted over from the SRODs to the Borg-Warner T5's...I don't know about the 2.3L's
 

GT350R

Member
Oct 5, 2000
723
0
17
Cleveland
Dec 11, 2003
#4
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #4
I sat tomato you say tomato.............. you know, matoe and mahto , jeez , I guess that ones does not fly on the internet.


Anyway, my point is......

One guy say fuel inection. One guy says EFI.

See where I am going with this.

Fuel injection started in 83.

EFI started in 87.

So which is it?



Three guys walk into a bar.

The forth one ducks.


Is this thing on?
 

nomuffler

Member
Aug 20, 2003
330
0
16
Awash in a sea of decedant luxury and meaningless
Dec 11, 2003
#5
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #5
Mustangs had mechanical fuel injection?
 

MSM0075

Member
May 13, 2003
741
0
16
Central Jersey
Dec 11, 2003
#6
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #6
I diden't know this either..
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Dec 11, 2003
#7
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #7
it was a bizzar carb feeback system with an O2 sensor.
 

GT350R

Member
Oct 5, 2000
723
0
17
Cleveland
Dec 11, 2003
#8
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #8
CFI.

Pretty normal stuff actually.

GM even used it until the 90's on their trucks (some of them)

Some people like to call it Carbed fuel injection. ITs actually Central Fuel injection.

It was used from 83 on some of the 2.3N/A's (option and I think standard in Canada?) , 3.8's, As well as the 302's. Until 85 on the 302 and until 86 I believe on the 3.8's.
 

nomuffler

Member
Aug 20, 2003
330
0
16
Awash in a sea of decedant luxury and meaningless
Dec 11, 2003
#9
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #9
Oh! those stupid electric carbuerators? My dad used to have a linclon Mark7 that had one of those. Wasn't terrible I guess, It works like speed density right?
 

nomuffler

Member
Aug 20, 2003
330
0
16
Awash in a sea of decedant luxury and meaningless
Dec 11, 2003
#10
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #10
GT350R said:
It was used from 83 on some of the 2.3N/A's .
Click to expand...
Ooh I wonder if I could use the one from the mark7 (it's resting in the yard). Did the 2.3's have the same as the 302s? that'd be a big carb for a 2.3

TO GOOGLE!
 

MSM0075

Member
May 13, 2003
741
0
16
Central Jersey
Dec 11, 2003
#11
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #11
haha.

My moms '84 Caddy Sevile had Fuel Injection. It had the same looks as a carb, same air filter cleaner and everything.
 

Anlushac11

Founding Member
Feb 17, 2001
2,270
0
0
Indianapolis, Indiana
Dec 14, 2003
#12
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #12
IIRC 1985 Mustang 2.3L was carb

In 1986 they had a EFI and a Carter YF 1BBl carb 2.3L. Mine was the 1bb Carb version. THE EFI version was IIRC speed density.

And I have seen a 4speed EFI 2.3L car. But it had the evil 4speed that had the external shaft on the side.

Wasnt that the German "Hummer" 4speed?
 

boondocksaint

New Member
Aug 31, 2003
75
0
0
Dec 14, 2003
#13
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #13
where i live i believe we call those 4 speed tranny's "rock crushers" almost takes 2 hands to shift. i could be wrong though
 

MSM0075

Member
May 13, 2003
741
0
16
Central Jersey
Dec 14, 2003
#14
  • Dec 14, 2003
  • #14
well if its the SROD. its really not that bad shifting. but if your use to a T5 trans, the SROD will def feel displaced. the SROD feels higher, taller and farther away from you...its werid going back from T5 and SROD :\
 

mr_woodster

Active Member
Jul 28, 2003
1,314
0
36
Riverside, CA
Dec 15, 2003
#15
  • Dec 15, 2003
  • #15
hmm 4 speed, my brother's 79 capri rs has a 4speed (currently plotting to swap witha t5), carb'd...i havent seen an efi 4 speed though
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
TKX Transmission Shifting Problem
  • KWC156
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Jun 13, 2026
427nostang
4
P
For Sale For sale: 1995 5.0 GT 5-speed manual transmission, in Bradenton Florida
  • PColasanto
  • Aug 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
12
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Mar 2, 2025
GT4Lyfe
G
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
J
89 2.3 LX running rich, hesitation on acceleration, high and hanging idle Help!
  • jpstucky
  • Jun 13, 2023
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
4
Views
3K
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 15, 2023
jpstucky
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?