• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

car wont start when hot.....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Green 94 5.0
  • Start date Start date Mar 26, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Mar 26, 2007
#1
  • Mar 26, 2007
  • #1
cold starts are perfect and immediate, but warm starts and i have to be on the gas to get her to turn over. the basics are a 331 stroker with a vortech s-trim and 42's with a pro-m 77mm to match. what should i be looking at in the tweecer to get this resolved? im using a j4j1 bin with all the basics changed, but no changes to anything regarding a/f.
 
T

tjh566

New Member
May 22, 2004
608
0
0
Northern Va
Mar 26, 2007
#2
  • Mar 26, 2007
  • #2
I sorta have the same problem, cold start, one crank and its goin, hot start it takes awhile. Looking for a solution myself.
 
B

BobCat

New Member
Feb 12, 2001
20
0
0
Mar 26, 2007
#3
  • Mar 26, 2007
  • #3
ISC Crank Duty Cycle
and
crank_fuel_plusewidth



Also make sure your inj comp for battery voltage is dialed in and the min pulse width has been adj. If you cant get it figured out post up a tune file and I'll make a few changes you can try.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Mar 26, 2007
#4
  • Mar 26, 2007
  • #4
I found some info from an older thread back in 11-05 that may help so
I just pasted it here for you

Three fixed parameters in the pcm fuel tables come into play when talking about startup.

1) Time
2) Load
3) ECT

We are dealing with two fuel tables.

1) fuel_table_base_OL
2) fuel_table_startup_OL

The base table is where you see the commanded ratio and it is used during warm up conditions.

The startup table is where you see values that are subtracted from the base table to give you a fatter ratio and time comes into play here.

You asked about hot start conditions so lets use that as an example.

btw, we're gonna use an unmodified j4j1 file for our little example.

Say you've been driving around and go in the house for a while and decide to go somewhere else. When you start the car for the second time, the ECT is 180*

Most NA h/c/i combos will idle at a load of say about .20 to .30 so we will use that load factor.

Looking at the base table you see the pcm is commanding a ratio of 14.302 at that load value and ECT.

Looking at the startup table in the 180* temp column at 0 to 6 seconds you see the value of 1.716. Notice as the time increases, the value decreases until finally at 40 seconds, the values in the table are no longer used.

Here are the commanded, startup, and final ratio values

00-06 secs cmd 14.302 startup 1.716 final ratio of 12.586
07-10 secs cmd 14.302 startup 1.487 final ratio of 12.815
11-20 secs cmd 14.302 startup 1.259 final ratio of 13.043
21-40 secs cmd 14.302 startup 0.572 final ratio of 13.73

At this point in time, you most likely go from Open Loop to Closed Loop conditions and the O2's are calling the shots to achieve the pcm's goal of 14.7 CL happiness.

The Fix is to go to the 210 & 240 ECT columns in the startup table and zero out those entire columns. If need be, you could always play with the values in the 180* column as well.

Grady
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Mar 26, 2007
#5
  • Mar 26, 2007
  • #5
final5-0 said:
I found some info from an older thread back in 11-05 that may help so
I just pasted it here for you

Three fixed parameters in the pcm fuel tables come into play when talking about startup.

1) Time
2) Load
3) ECT

We are dealing with two fuel tables.

1) fuel_table_base_OL
2) fuel_table_startup_OL

The base table is where you see the commanded ratio and it is used during warm up conditions.

The startup table is where you see values that are subtracted from the base table to give you a fatter ratio and time comes into play here.

You asked about hot start conditions so lets use that as an example.

btw, we're gonna use an unmodified j4j1 file for our little example.

Say you've been driving around and go in the house for a while and decide to go somewhere else. When you start the car for the second time, the ECT is 180*

Most NA h/c/i combos will idle at a load of say about .20 to .30 so we will use that load factor.

Looking at the base table you see the pcm is commanding a ratio of 14.302 at that load value and ECT.

Looking at the startup table in the 180* temp column at 0 to 6 seconds you see the value of 1.716. Notice as the time increases, the value decreases until finally at 40 seconds, the values in the table are no longer used.

Here are the commanded, startup, and final ratio values

00-06 secs cmd 14.302 startup 1.716 final ratio of 12.586
07-10 secs cmd 14.302 startup 1.487 final ratio of 12.815
11-20 secs cmd 14.302 startup 1.259 final ratio of 13.043
21-40 secs cmd 14.302 startup 0.572 final ratio of 13.73

At this point in time, you most likely go from Open Loop to Closed Loop conditions and the O2's are calling the shots to achieve the pcm's goal of 14.7 CL happiness.

The Fix is to go to the 210 & 240 ECT columns in the startup table and zero out those entire columns. If need be, you could always play with the values in the 180* column as well.

Grady
Click to expand...
grady, i dont see those tables. i am using the cbaza strategy. the closest i can find a match to those tables are for the a9L.
 
B

BobCat

New Member
Feb 12, 2001
20
0
0
Mar 27, 2007
#6
  • Mar 27, 2007
  • #6
Green 94 5.0 said:
grady, i dont see those tables. i am using the cbaza strategy. the closest i can find a match to those tables are for the a9L.
Click to expand...

Decrease the crank-fuel plusewidth and increase the IAC on the functions that I posted and it will take care of your problem.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Mar 27, 2007
#7
  • Mar 27, 2007
  • #7
Gee Roger

Those tables have been around for as long as I can remember

I have seen some say on the Tweecer site the newer software
(which I don't use btw) has had some of the definition names
changed but I could not say if those two tables are in that group

I would also say the method BobCat put up has a focus on the
cranking time period where as the info I gave is for after the
motor has fired

I've seen some say they divided the old and new size inj for a
starting place to tweec with the cranking stuff. You are just
trying to cut down the fuel as the new inj is now much
larger than the old

Grady
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Mar 27, 2007
#8
  • Mar 27, 2007
  • #8
final5-0 said:
Gee Roger

Those tables have been around for as long as I can remember

I have seen some say on the Tweecer site the newer software
(which I don't use btw) has had some of the definition names
changed but I could not say if those two tables are in that group

I would also say the method BobCat put up has a focus on the
cranking time period where as the info I gave is for after the
motor has fired

I've seen some say they divided the old and new size inj for a
starting place to tweec with the cranking stuff. You are just
trying to cut down the fuel as the new inj is now much
larger than the old

Grady
Click to expand...
well that would explain it. i have the newest version of the software installed.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Mar 27, 2007
#9
  • Mar 27, 2007
  • #9
Green 94 5.0 said:
well that would explain it. i have the newest version of the software installed.
Click to expand...

That Sucks

You'd think the latest and greatest would add more options
NOT
Take them away

Maybe they are just named something different

The Base OL table has load on the left and ect on the top

The Startup OL table has time on the left and ect on the top

I took a quick look at the functions BobCat talked about.

It would seem to me you could find some help with the function
fuel_crank_PW_multiply_ECT

My reasoning would be since your current inj's are about twice
the size and you are talking about hot issues.

You could try half the value for temps 150 and up

Grady
 
T

tjh566

New Member
May 22, 2004
608
0
0
Northern Va
Mar 27, 2007
#10
  • Mar 27, 2007
  • #10
yeah, ive installed the B3U or w/e it is (latest once) and alot changed, alot of table names are different, ect.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Mar 27, 2007
#11
  • Mar 27, 2007
  • #11
tjh566 said:
yeah, ive installed the B3U or w/e it is (latest once) and alot changed, alot of table names are different, ect.
Click to expand...

That seems counter productive

A lot of those names were the same across the whole self tuning
community with EEC Tuner and the various software revisions
for Tweecer ..... up until this latest version

Its no wonder most of those "really smart peeps" on the Tweecer site
have abandoned CalEdit and started to use editors that work
with the bin file.

Yet ... One more valid reason in my eyes ................

I'll just stick to Good Ole V1.20

It works and the bugs are fairly minimal

Looks like I'm gonna be less and less of a help for others as time
marches on

Grady
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Mar 28, 2007
#12
  • Mar 28, 2007
  • #12
you wouldnt happen to have the 1.20 install files handy would you?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Mar 28, 2007
#13
  • Mar 28, 2007
  • #13
Green 94 5.0 said:
you wouldnt happen to have the 1.20 install files handy would you?
Click to expand...

Yes Sir

I don't know if I could call it handy as I don't remember where I got
it stashed but ... I got it somewhere and I can dig it up if you wish.

If you wanted to see those tables .......

A easy way for you to see them unmodified and my tweecs to them
would be for you to download the file of my complete j4j1 tune
in screen shots from my site.

Grady
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Mar 28, 2007
#14
  • Mar 28, 2007
  • #14
final5-0 said:
Yes Sir

I don't know if I could call it handy as I don't remember where I got
it stashed but ... I got it somewhere and I can dig it up if you wish.

If you wanted to see those tables .......

A easy way for you to see them unmodified and my tweecs to them
would be for you to download the file of my complete j4j1 tune
in screen shots from my site.

Grady
Click to expand...
if you could find them that would be great.....if not, i refer to the screens on your site. thanks for all the help grady.
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Mar 28, 2007
#15
  • Mar 28, 2007
  • #15
well joe came over this morning and we got the surge down to a minimum. the tps voltage was way off reading 1.3 when we started. it is now sitting at 0.95 which brought it down form a 750rpm surge to maybe a 100rpm jump. once we get the timing set 100% im going to focus on the hot start issue a little more. the reason i mention what we did is the car seems to run a bit longer now on hot start than it did before.
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Apr 3, 2007
#16
  • Apr 3, 2007
  • #16
UPDATE: the timing is at 10* and the tps is at 0.965. now she runs but we are back to the surging again. she is running so rich it burns your eyes to be next to the car after it has been on for a few seconds. any idea what tables to modify to lean it out at idle?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 3, 2007
#17
  • Apr 3, 2007
  • #17
Green 94 5.0 said:
UPDATE: the timing is at 10* and the tps is at 0.965. now she runs but we are back to the surging again. she is running so rich it burns your eyes to be next to the car after it has been on for a few seconds. any idea what tables to modify to lean it out at idle?
Click to expand...

Do you have a wb and if so ... what is it showing currently at idle

What are your K's now doing

Here are a few things ... but ... you may have already done them

Low slope at 42
High slope at 50.4

Load in breakpoints for 42's

Cut your minimum pulse width in half

Grady
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Apr 3, 2007
#18
  • Apr 3, 2007
  • #18
final5-0 said:
Do you have a wb and if so ... what is it showing currently at idle

What are your K's now doing

Here are a few things ... but ... you may have already done them

Low slope at 42
High slope at 50.4

Load in breakpoints for 42's

Cut your minimum pulse width in half

Grady
Click to expand...
i do have a wideband, but as of now it isnt in. i switched mid pipes and need to get another bung welded. im going to try a few of those things and see if any of them help.....thanks again for all the help grady.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 3, 2007
#19
  • Apr 3, 2007
  • #19
Green 94 5.0 said:
i do have a wideband, but as of now it isnt in. i switched mid pipes and need to get another bung welded. im going to try a few of those things and see if any of them help.....thanks again for all the help grady.
Click to expand...

No Prob

Really ... for Closed Loop Tuning ... since you can datalog

You can use the K values and obtain a very stable tune without a WB

Lots of good info about slopes, breakpoints, and other stuff which pertain
to dialing in all the inj values can be found in EEC Analyzer.

Let us know about your progress
and
A bunch of folks run 42's over on the Tweecer site
and
Their search engine is fairly decent

Grady
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Apr 3, 2007
#20
  • Apr 3, 2007
  • #20
Hey Roger

I Hosed Up on the above posts

I told you to load in the breakpoints for 42's

I was just having a ... Senior Moment ... when I posted that stuff

I should'a used the word ..... offsets

Sorry about that

Grady
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
G
Engine At the end of my sanity. 92 GT on jack stands for the last 11 years - NO START
  • Green 94 5.0
  • Apr 13, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 24, 2024
FastDriver
J
Warm Engine stalls when put in gear
  • Jarhead67
  • Dec 1, 2021
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
699
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 1, 2021
Jarhead67
J
F
1993 Cobra flooding
  • FireFoxCobra_SVT93
  • May 20, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 11, 2023
nickyb
1
1990 mustang gt running like crap when hot,but good when first start up.
  • 1990GT331
  • Nov 17, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2020
jrichker
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?