• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Carb Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Credzba
  • Start date Start date Oct 7, 2004
C

Credzba

Member
Jul 11, 2004
37
0
6
Oct 7, 2004
#1
  • Oct 7, 2004
  • #1
I am having a new engine built for my mustang.
It's one of the std. 347 stroker engines with afr 185 heads and a moderate cam (cam not selected until we flow the heads).

At any rate, I was going to use my 289 performer intake from edelbrock and my 500 cfm card from edelbrock.
I considered going to a holley 750 dbl-pumper, but when I went to the Holley site and did the math I'd be lucky to need a 600 cfm carb.

Their formula for carb selection is
Engine size (CID) x maximum RPM / 3456 = CFM
CFM @ 100% volumetric efficiency

And they note most cars are 80% efficiency up to 89% on highly modified cars.

Well 347 * 6000 / 3456 = 602
at even 90% efficiency thats only 541

Based on that my 500 cfm carb will limit me some, but a 750 seems way overkill.

What is you guys experience?
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Oct 7, 2004
#2
  • Oct 7, 2004
  • #2
I think that intake and 500cfm carb would choke your motor.

The formula only gives a ballpark, but I think you'd be much better off with a good single plane intake and a 750cfm carb.

You already have the extra cubes and good flowing heads, upgrade the rest to match.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Oct 7, 2004
#3
  • Oct 7, 2004
  • #3
check out the AFR website and see what they have done with an xe274hr cam and an xe282hr camshaft. You should probably go with the xe274hr for an OTS camshaft.

As for a Carburetor....Holley's math is correct, however, I think your engine is going to spin a little more than 6000 rpms. Again, check the AFR site. They usually use a Speed Demon 650 (they flow 753cfm of air). They use that carb with their box-stock AFR heads and the cam that I mentioned.

As for an intake. First of all, if you want to sell the performer 289, let me know. I think you should probably go with something like a weiand X-cellerator or an Edelbrock RPM with the center section notched. That performer intake is definetly going to inhibit your engine's potential.

Shane
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
230
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
J
Converting to carburetor
  • Jarhead67
  • Dec 28, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
841
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 19, 2025
Jarhead67
J
R
351w stroked to 408 CARB
  • Ric4eyedFox
  • Mar 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
630
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2025
General karthief
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
369
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
670
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?