• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Carb spacers

  • Thread starter Thread starter 65notch
  • Start date Start date Nov 7, 2005

65notch

New Member
Jun 18, 2005
303
1
0
661 Cali
Nov 7, 2005
#1
  • Nov 7, 2005
  • #1
i need opinions on car spacers...
they are pretty inexpensive and easy to install so im curious to hear everybodys opinions on them.
i have a 289 .030 over performer rpm intake and performer carb. stock heads. what do you guys suggest as for me getting one, and if so what kind. i see there are different sizes, materials, styles ect.
thanks
 

GrandeStang73

Member
Apr 16, 2005
93
0
6
VA
Nov 7, 2005
#2
  • Nov 7, 2005
  • #2
Doesny have to be thick, its just a peice of high specific heat plastic to try and cool the air to dense up the air flow. Might see a lil more throttle response but not much in HP or Torque. I recommend Mr.Gasket or anything made out of G-10 Plastic.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Nov 8, 2005
#3
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #3
About all the non-metal spacers do is insulate the carb from heat like Grande said. Phenolic is good, but I wouldnt go over 1" thick. Its said that installing a spacer will move the power band up some, but I think you'll see it on a dyno chart alot more than you'll feel it.
 

68 Coop

New Member
Aug 13, 2005
104
0
0
Mesquite, NV
Nov 8, 2005
#4
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #4
I agree here, you won't really notice any difference. I added one (plastic) from the Zone, fits well, but no diff in the end.
 

FORCED2DV8

New Member
Jun 6, 2005
458
0
0
Grand Rapids MI
Nov 8, 2005
#5
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #5
Yeah you will see a small increase on the dyno but you wont feel any diffrence.
 

krash kendall

Active Member
Nov 19, 2004
1,258
0
36
Aldergrove, B.C. Canada
Nov 8, 2005
#6
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #6
I had to use a 1" dual plane aluminum spacer to get my edelbrock 600 up high enough to clear the Elite series tall valve covers. The added manifold volume is supposed to provide snappier throttle response, but I can't verify anything as I can't run the car without it.

The one negative thing is that you will double the gasket mating surfaces (four instead of two), which increases the chances of a vacuum leak. I had to crank my carb down way over spec in order to stop the vacuum leaks so I could pass emissions testing.
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Nov 8, 2005
#7
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #7
I put a 1" phenolic spacer on my Vic Jr and I can say it may no differnce to the 1/4 ET or MPH. If it lowers the heat transfer into the carb (it should) I could not really tell a difference in ET or MPH, but then again I did not measure the actual temp of the carb before and after. It felt very hot to the touch either way.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Nov 8, 2005
#8
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #8
What have read is that the benefits are highly variable and dependent on your overall combo. Some say not to bother with a spacer on a Vic Jr. unless it is 2" (open), which becomes a hood clearance problem for many of us. As for dual plane, results range from worse performance to marginally better. A 1" open spacer will increase plenum volume, but defeats some of the dual plane ("180*") design by allowing plenum sharing from one side to the other. A 4-holer would preserve the dual plane design. Again, results are varied. All spacers increase plenum volume and provide more vertical space for the air/fuel mixture to make the 90* turn from the carb to the runners, which sometimes helps (less puddling of fuel at the bottom of the plenum. If material is also a thermal barrier, then some benefit from isolating the carb from manifold heat may be had.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Nov 8, 2005
#9
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #9
I put a 1/2" spacer on mine and gained nearly 200hp! But really you have to try it to tell, and there are alot of designs. From what I've read the tapered ones rule.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Nov 8, 2005
#10
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #10
Longer runners are supposed to help the bottom end not the top end, to improve top end you want shorter runners. So one would not expect to see lower ETs or higher peak dyno numbers by adding a spacer.

But the driveability should be improved slightly for normal street (as in commuting or cruising) RPM ranges.
 
M

mustangprodude

New Member
Jun 7, 2004
45
0
0
Nov 8, 2005
#11
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #11
My '83 vert came with a 1" aluminum spacer. I took it off when I tried a friends carb and never put it back on when I reinstalled my carb. No difference. It's now looking cool hanging on my shop wall.
 
T

TOM B

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 15, 2002
872
1
18
Harrisburg Pa
Nov 8, 2005
#12
  • Nov 8, 2005
  • #12
I remember HOT ROD did a story on this but I cant find it. They dino'd before and after a spacer was installed. What they found was a little torque increase in a 1/2 to 1'' spacer but then when they went thicker it fell back off. Makes sense though, That why you buy a high rise manifold or tunnel ram to increase your power band.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
Good all around perfornace-ish tires?
  • optionizerSS
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
472
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 15, 2026
TPony
B
97 GT with 03 explorer Eddie Bauer edition 4.6l
  • basbill73
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
131
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 11, 2026
squeak93
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
416
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
CFI to carb conversion question
  • StockerStang
  • Mar 23, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
633
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 11, 2025
AeroCoupe
Eastern North Carolina Autocross Events!
  • Warhorse Racing
  • Feb 23, 2026
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Replies
0
Views
549
Regional Forums and Event Information Feb 23, 2026
Warhorse Racing
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?