• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Cervini fiberglass hatch lids

  • Thread starter Thread starter dderek
  • Start date Start date Aug 10, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

dderek

New Member
Feb 29, 2004
180
0
0
Aug 10, 2004
#1
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #1
got bored. looked around their website.
they have fiberglass hatch lids for $449.

i was just wondering, how much do you think they weigh vs stock steel lids.
$450 might be worth that extra weight off the car.
even though its off the rear

plus whatever you make back selling the stock lid
 

mustang90

Founding Member
Feb 8, 2001
1,209
15
58
Aug 10, 2004
#2
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #2
Why would you want to reduce weight off of the rear of the car? There already too light as is. I would save the money and juice up the suspension!
Cervinis only caries the best of quality and Im sure you will save 40lbs or so.
 

MustangMulch

New Member
Mar 27, 2003
303
0
0
Santa Clarita, CA
Aug 10, 2004
#3
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #3
Yeah sounds like a bad idea. I'd put the money towards suspension.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 10, 2004
#4
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #4
Yeah, weight off the car is good, but try to take it off of the front if you can. Have you got the battery in the hatch yet? Doesn't save any weight, but it redistributes the weight that you've already got. Save up for a tubular K-member, that'll cut it down some.
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Aug 10, 2004
#5
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #5
It isn't even that much of a weight savings. Most of the weight of the hatch is that huge ass glass window. You gonna leave that out? The spoiler is no feather either. The hatch itself, once you take out the glass and pull the wing, doesn't weigh much at all.
Also, as was already mentioned, the weight is coming off the wrong end of the car. About the only benefit I can see at all is that, well, it isn't going to rust...
 

UMDSmith

Member
Feb 10, 2004
226
0
17
Salisbury, Maryland
Aug 10, 2004
#6
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #6
The window weighs no more then 30 lbs. The metal of the hatch weighs more then that. Tempered parts are very light. Even large windshields aren't more then 50 lbs, and I'm talking Chevy/Ford Van's, and Semi's.
 

UMDSmith

Member
Feb 10, 2004
226
0
17
Salisbury, Maryland
Aug 10, 2004
#7
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #7
Call Cervini's, see if they have the specs on weight difference. ANY weight off the car would be good, as long as your suspension is setup to put the weight on the rear wheels under hard acceleration.

Overall though, if you can get 1hp pushing less lbs, front or back, you will be faster. Like I said though, your suspension will have to be set correctly.
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Aug 10, 2004
#8
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #8
And you've had a hatch apart? I have, several. When you take out the glass and remove the wing, you can carry it around with one finger. Furthurmore, you have to remove 100lbs to shave one tenth of one second off a quarter mile ET, and that's only if the car is left as well balanced as it was before. In this case, it won't be. It takes a performance automatic longer than that to shift. You not only won't shave 100lbs like this, you won't even shave 50. That means the time savings would be more like 1/20th of a second. Absolutely useless, not even considering that taking that weight from the rear, if anything, would make it slower on the holeshot and squirmier at speed regardless of suspension configuration. If this worked, all the fastest foxes would have them, and they don't. Matter of fact, in five years of working on them, living them, and subscribing to every magazine dedicated to them, I think I've seen two- and they weren't that fast anyway.
 

dderek

New Member
Feb 29, 2004
180
0
0
Aug 10, 2004
#9
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #9
uh i wasnt thinking of this as a 'good mod to do'
i was just asking about it. seeing how much it would save.
shoot me for being curious. damn.

anyway
yes. i have a battery relocation kit. havent installed it yet
still waiting for my heads to get back from the machine shop
yes. suspension is next on my list.
probably maximum motor sports. havent decided
then baer brakes to take me to 5 lug.

i dont appreciate being flamed for asking how much it would save.
weight is weight.
ill have a optima yellowtop & sealed box, 40lb 12" +fiberglass, 1,500watt amp, and dynomat all in the back anyways.
as for the front end. it will all be tubular soon, and aluminum heads save some weight. not like ill have to worry about it being too light back there

and no. i dont care about the extra weight from a system and all that
its my daily driver. id like to enjoy it
and if a sub makes me a ricer. i dont ****ing care.
 
B

blk92stangg

New Member
Jan 30, 2004
583
0
0
Hawaii
Aug 10, 2004
#10
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #10
Hey derek, I don't think you were being flamed, as I read the posts. Either way, the only reason I would go with a fiber-hatch is because mine is rusted.
 

dderek

New Member
Feb 29, 2004
180
0
0
Aug 11, 2004
#11
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #11
blk92stangg said:
Hey derek, I don't think you were being flamed, as I read the posts. Either way, the only reason I would go with a fiber-hatch is because mine is rusted.
Click to expand...

well, the '86 has a rusted hatch.
so i figured. maybe i can get a fiberglass one for the lx. and put that one on the 86
that is if i can still get the ex's uncle to paint it super cheap. he had a paint booth in his back yard.
be cheap. save weight on one car. fix a rust problem on another.
 

DirtyD916

Active Member
May 25, 2003
804
1
38
Norcal 916
Aug 11, 2004
#12
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #12
heck if your going to get a new hatch get the fiberglass one. Might as well.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Aug 11, 2004
#13
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #13
If you are in fact going to go for the fibreglass unit, you'd better make sure you've got a host of chassis bracing throughout the rest of the car to stiffen it up. The rear hatchback is a real point of strength for that body style and I'd bet the fibreglass unit doesn't offer the strength or ridged construction that the steel unit does. It may contribute to a lot of unwanted body flex?
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Aug 11, 2004
#14
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #14
blk92stangg said:
Hey derek, I don't think you were being flamed, as I read the posts.
Click to expand...
Thank you... I think. Derek, if you were referring to me, I had no intention of flaming you. If I did, there would be no doubt in anyone's mind. I was in fact replying to UMDSmith, who hopefully isn't too pissed at me. If you gleaned some info from it, all the better- but it was a respectable question on your part and I just tried to give an honest answer from experience, as I wondered the same thing once and I doubt many people have worked with them. Gearbanger brought up a valid point that I'm irritated I forgot about: if you want to do it, you better figure a cage in there as well. The hatch's are a flimsy platform already, and taking out the steel hatch only makes it worse. Good luck with your rides.

BTW- call me a ricelover; I have 2 subs, 2 amps, an Epicenter, a capacitor, a yellow top, and a dedicated system fan back there.
 

UMDSmith

Member
Feb 10, 2004
226
0
17
Salisbury, Maryland
Aug 11, 2004
#15
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #15
Not pissed at all, but the conclusion we gained is that the wing must weigh a ton. I install autoglass, and the hatch glass is pretty damn light, so the wing must be fairly heavy. That would make sense considering the wind forces that are applied to it to create downforce at high speeds.

I'm still a firm beleiver that weight is weight, whether it be negligible or not. A bad weight balance can be corrected with a decent suspension and springs - with limits of course.

As far as flexing is concerned, that is something I had not considered, but I would think the fiberglass + glass inside it would be fairly stiff, although certainly not as stiff as the metal hatch. Subframes, preferably with cross members would be a good addition if chasis flex is a problem without a metal hatch.

2 subs in a soon to be finished custom box where the back seat was, 2 amps, 4 speakers, 2 components, and soon to add a yellow top myself.
 

MCRParts.com

Founding Sponsor
Mar 21, 2002
1,259
0
0
New Hampshire
Oct 21, 2004
#16
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #16
UMDSmith said:
Not pissed at all, but the conclusion we gained is that the wing must weigh a ton. I install autoglass, and the hatch glass is pretty damn light, so the wing must be fairly heavy. That would make sense considering the wind forces that are applied to it to create downforce at high speeds.

I'm still a firm beleiver that weight is weight, whether it be negligible or not. A bad weight balance can be corrected with a decent suspension and springs - with limits of course.

As far as flexing is concerned, that is something I had not considered, but I would think the fiberglass + glass inside it would be fairly stiff, although certainly not as stiff as the metal hatch. Subframes, preferably with cross members would be a good addition if chasis flex is a problem without a metal hatch.

2 subs in a soon to be finished custom box where the back seat was, 2 amps, 4 speakers, 2 components, and soon to add a yellow top myself.
Click to expand...


I'm getting a Cervinis fiberglass hatch and was concerned about the weight loss, so heres your solution.When you go to the track FILL YOUR TANK.

I think 1 Gallon of gas weights something like 8lbs. So instead of racing on a 1/4 tank race on a full tank.

My hatch is rotted,so thats why I'm going this route.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 21, 2004
#17
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #17
Holy Thread Resurecton Batman!
 

MCRParts.com

Founding Sponsor
Mar 21, 2002
1,259
0
0
New Hampshire
Oct 21, 2004
#18
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #18
Gearbanger 101 said:
Holy Thread Resurecton Batman!
Click to expand...



I used the search button (yup I did) to do some research on a glass hatch,and pulled up this thread.

I wish that there was a metal aftermarket hatch available,but I can't find one.SO figured I'd get a new one from Cervinie's.I'll just have to tank up for drag racin trips.
 
D

Demented4.6

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2001
1,055
1
38
DAYTON, OHIO
Oct 21, 2004
#19
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #19
well since you resurected the thread. I wonder if there is anyone on here that has a fiberglass hatch. Id like to know about quality and see some pics.
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Oct 21, 2004
#20
  • Oct 21, 2004
  • #20
Gearbanger 101 said:
If you are in fact going to go for the fibreglass unit, you'd better make sure you've got a host of chassis bracing throughout the rest of the car to stiffen it up. The rear hatchback is a real point of strength for that body style and I'd bet the fibreglass unit doesn't offer the strength or ridged construction that the steel unit does. It may contribute to a lot of unwanted body flex?
Click to expand...
LOL LMAO THAT IS THE FUNNIEST THING I HAVE HEARD.............IF YOU THINK THE HATCH STIFFENS THE CHASSIS YOUR CRAZY FOX BODY HATCH'S ARE KNOWN TO HAVE HORRIBLE FLEX AND NOT SEAL AT ALL.........MOST CAN MOVE SIDE TO SIDE CLOSED.....................NOW A CROSS BRACE THAT BOLTS UP IN THE TRUNK WOULD HELP FLEX BUT THE HATCH AINT WORTH $hit... I HATE WHEN EVERYONE JUMPS UP PEOPLE'S @SS HERE HE JUST WANTED TO KNOw HOW MUCH WEIGHT IT SAVED IM GONNA USE ONE WHY NOT?????LOOK AT A NASCAR THAT ARE ALL TIN........ AND FAST AS HELL.......IF YOU HAVE FATTER TIRES BIGGER RIMS AND THE WHOLE 9 YARDS ON THE SUSPENSION SIDE YOU SHOULD COME OUT EQUAL BECAUSE OF THE BIGGER RIMS/TIRES AND ADDED SUSPENSION PARTS.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Tuesday at 3:59 PM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
146
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Yesterday at 8:05 PM
AeroCoupe
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
851
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?