• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Cheapest and best fitting 351 oil pan

  • Thread starter Thread starter 83Mustang427TT
  • Start date Start date Jun 27, 2006

83Mustang427TT

New Member
Jan 18, 2006
162
0
0
Jun 27, 2006
#1
  • Jun 27, 2006
  • #1
Hey guys,
My fiance wants the engine in the car and luckily Im done with as much as I can do before it goes in anyway..Im lookin for the cheapest and best fitting 351 Swap pan. Last time I used the moroso swap pan and I dont like the way the rear bolts go through the inside of the pan, That and the ARP oilpan bolts didnt seem long enough to seal the thick rail on the moroso pan ... I have been kinda leaning towards the hamburgers oil pan what'dya all think ? is it any good or should I go with The FRPP stock type pan?
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 27, 2006
#2
  • Jun 27, 2006
  • #2
I would think the FRPP pan would be the cheapest. I have not heard any quality complaints on them.

I am using a Canton pan, and it has treated me well.

jason
 
R

R2D2

Jun 27, 2006
#3
  • Jun 27, 2006
  • #3
truck pan
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jun 27, 2006
#4
  • Jun 27, 2006
  • #4
i have a milidon pan on my 351w. the problem with them is they didn't make a dipstick at the time for it. it took me forever to get the right one and a lot of calls to the tech line.
 

83Mustang427TT

New Member
Jan 18, 2006
162
0
0
Jun 27, 2006
#5
  • Jun 27, 2006
  • #5
The Frpp is ok but I wanted something with a lil more capacity Anyone got any E-coupons for jegs?
 

pb_paulie_b

Founding Member
May 19, 2001
894
0
0
Chaptico, Maryland
Jun 27, 2006
#6
  • Jun 27, 2006
  • #6
FRPP pan and a standard volume oil pump. You don't really need anything else. I'd use a Canton for higher capacity, their price is not cheap but competitive...PB
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
Jun 27, 2006
#7
  • Jun 27, 2006
  • #7
crown vic from a junkyard, and if you wanted extra cap you could cut and weld. thats how a lot of aftermarket pans are made from stock stuff (ie canton)
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 27, 2006
#8
  • Jun 27, 2006
  • #8
352Ford2 said:
crown vic from a junkyard, and if you wanted extra cap you could cut and weld. thats how a lot of aftermarket pans are made from stock stuff (ie canton)
Click to expand...

My Canton pan does not resemble a stock pan in any way.
Even the rails are obviously not part of a stock pan.

I am sure they did cut and weld when doing the design work.
No reason to reinvent the wheel when doing mockups.

The production pans seem to be fab'd from scratch though.
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
Jun 28, 2006
#9
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #9
Most oil pans are made from a stamping die that is kinda costly tooling for low production numbers. That is why a number of aftermarket oil pan makers use new stock pans (or one for a stock replacement then they only need one tool for the number of diffrent types of oil pan they offer for that engine) and cut and weld in the additional features. It isn’t that bad if it is done properly (fixtures, good diamentional control, etc.). The advantage of the expensive aftermarket pans that have their own tooling is you can put in some really neat features like thicker pan rails. Look at a canton, and you will see it has the factory rail and the extra capacity sumps that have been welded on.

http://www.cantonracingproducts.com/pans/road_race/ford_rear_sump.html
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 28, 2006
#10
  • Jun 28, 2006
  • #10
I am not trying to pick a fight, but it seems that the Canton pans are cut from flat stock, bent to shape, and welded together.

The rail on my Canton pan does not resemble the stock 351w rails I have seen.
The Canton pan has a series of grooves (not sure what else to call them), that supposedly provide better gasket sealing.
The stock pan rails I have seen have all been flat on the gasket surface.

I don't feel that the Canton pan uses a stock Ford pan as a starting point. No doubt a couple of Ford pans were sacrificed by Canton to create the Canton design, but it appears that the production Canton pans are fabricated from scratch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
887
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Progress Thread "Alter Ego" White 1993 LX 5.0 5spd
  • idareu
  • Sep 9, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 19, 2025
idareu
Fitting a Milodon 8-qt oil pan
  • Adieu
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
1
Views
1K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Oct 28, 2022
extra_stout
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
What Oil Pan and Pick-up for sn95 with 347 and Girdle
  • ebowie
  • Sep 29, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2020
ebowie
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?