• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

Check out the new RSC-GT Mustang!

  • Thread starter Thread starter retrobuilt
  • Start date Start date Sep 21, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
G

gt06

New Member
Jul 14, 2007
54
0
0
Chicago
Sep 23, 2007
#21
  • Sep 23, 2007
  • #21
I think it looks OK, my major gripe would be the 20 inch wheels. 20's don't belong on a performance car! (Actually 20's don't belong on any car IMHO.)
 
R

retrobuilt

New Member
Sep 21, 2007
0
0
0
Sep 23, 2007
#22
  • Sep 23, 2007
  • #22
We had a deicision to make on the wheels, we wanted the Magnum 500 look but sizes jump from a 17" Magnum to the 20" we felt the 17's would be too small for the wheelwell so we went to the 20's. If anyone knows of someone making an 18" Magnum we'd be very interested, thanks, Tony
 

newskool

Active Member
Oct 17, 2006
251
37
48
Fayetteville, NC
Sep 23, 2007
#23
  • Sep 23, 2007
  • #23
retrobuilt said:
We had a deicision to make on the wheels, we wanted the Magnum 500 look but sizes jump from a 17" Magnum to the 20" we felt the 17's would be too small for the wheelwell so we went to the 20's. If anyone knows of someone making an 18" Magnum we'd be very interested, thanks, Tony
Click to expand...

Carrol Shelby makes an 18x9.5 in three finishes.
http://www.carrollshelbywheels.com/specs.htm

Also different aspects of the car are nice and I'm sure they would be marketable as individual pieces, but as a whole the car is too cluttered. It looks like a great show piece of several custom parts. Un fortunately they don't all flow together cleanly.
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Sep 23, 2007
#24
  • Sep 23, 2007
  • #24
retrobuilt said:
We had a deicision to make on the wheels, we wanted the Magnum 500 look but sizes jump from a 17" Magnum to the 20" we felt the 17's would be too small for the wheelwell so we went to the 20's. If anyone knows of someone making an 18" Magnum we'd be very interested, thanks, Tony
Click to expand...

Cervini's sells a very similar wheel in 18's. I think a couple other companies sell them too. Also Shelby started making the CS69's in 18's last month.

 
R

retrobuilt

New Member
Sep 21, 2007
0
0
0
Sep 23, 2007
#25
  • Sep 23, 2007
  • #25
Thanks for the input guys, we'll check into it...T
 

anthony05gt

Active Member
Mar 18, 2006
1,262
1
37
59
Maryland
Sep 23, 2007
#26
  • Sep 23, 2007
  • #26
OK, a couple of things here. The 2 tone color combo is throwing me off. Looks like a Foose paint job. I'd like to see a solid color like something Ford is currently using. I agree the hood has to go or modify the front section of the scoop much lower. I'm diggin' the idea overall. I'd like to see a black one.
 

blackonblack06

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
108
0
0
San Antonio, TEXAS
www.cardomain.com
Sep 24, 2007
#27
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #27
MHO...I am sorry but I have to say I think the polite replys retrobuilt is giving to some of these harshly composed posts is extremely commendable and very mature.

I think the front end does have too much going on. Moreover, make the lower bumper plain, slope the hood up towards the rear instead of the front, and add some retro 18" bullits and I bet it would look much better. And all black would definitely be a winner for me
 
M

mikes06gt

New Member
Sep 9, 2006
47
0
0
Sep 24, 2007
#28
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #28
it just doesnt fit...the front end looks like it does not belong on the car
 
R

retrobuilt

New Member
Sep 21, 2007
0
0
0
Sep 24, 2007
#29
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #29
Thanks guys, I have pics of the car in black, I'll attach soon, T
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
43
Enfield, CT
Sep 24, 2007
#30
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #30
Way to much going on in the front, as a lot of people say less is more. I would say put a standard front bumper on that and just use a normal hood scoop or no scoop, other then that I like how the front looks. Change the rear to use the standard dual exhaust cut outs, its a mustang not a corvette. I also think it would look much better with the tail panel all black instead of silver. Another thing that I think would look good on the car is the silver horse side window louvers, you might want to look into that. As for the rims, 20" is way to big for the car. As other people mentioned 18 should be as big as you go. With those changes that car would look bad a$$. You guys have a good start, now you just need to refine it.
 
R

retrobuilt

New Member
Sep 21, 2007
0
0
0
Sep 25, 2007
#31
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #31
Thanks for the input, we are taking care of the hood problem now, the rear is undergoing dramatic changes that will be seen on the Shelby version in prototyping now, I think you'll like it. The 1969 Boss 302 version is coming along nicely also, we will be incorporating the chrome bumpers and extending the roof line to the rear of the car...this really looks cool, I'll post pics of the progress soon, Thanks, Tony
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Sep 25, 2007
#32
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #32
retrobuilt said:
Thanks for the input, we are taking care of the hood problem now, the rear is undergoing dramatic changes that will be seen on the Shelby version in prototyping now, I think you'll like it. The 1969 Boss 302 version is coming along nicely also, we will be incorporating the chrome bumpers and extending the roof line to the rear of the car...this really looks cool, I'll post pics of the progress soon, Thanks, Tony
Click to expand...

Can't wait to see that. I want a fastback s197 so bad it hurts.
 

red05bullitgt

Member
Aug 15, 2005
861
0
16
Pittsburgh, PA.
Sep 26, 2007
#33
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #33
The current S-197 IS a fastback ! what Retrobuilt is describing by extending the roofline into the rear of the car.. is commonly referred to as the sportsroof, which was used on the 67-73 non-notchback coupes..Although nothing would please me more, than to see and want an S-197 full fastback ? IMHO it just wouldn't look right, as both the rear glass and trunk area, would look way too high and flat, with hardly any sloping lines at all, let alone lack of rear visibility (similar to the 71-73 Mustang) in which I refer to, as the Flatback lol. That being said ! I can understand why Ford chose not to design the current S-197, as a full fastback
 

blacksheep06

New Member
Jan 31, 2006
288
0
0
Sep 26, 2007
#34
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #34
 
R

retrobuilt

New Member
Sep 21, 2007
0
0
0
Sep 26, 2007
#35
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #35
My initial post directs you to the Retrobuilt website for pictures, Thanks, T
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Sep 26, 2007
#36
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #36
red05bullitgt said:
The current S-197 IS a fastback ! what Retrobuilt is describing by extending the roofline into the rear of the car.. is commonly referred to as the sportsroof, which was used on the 67-73 non-notchback coupes..Although nothing would please me more, than to see and want an S-197 full fastback ? IMHO it just wouldn't look right, as both the rear glass and trunk area, would look way too high and flat, with hardly any sloping lines at all, let alone lack of rear visibility (similar to the 71-73 Mustang) in which I refer to, as the Flatback lol. That being said ! I can understand why Ford chose not to design the current S-197, as a full fastback
Click to expand...

A fastback is a car body style characterised by a continuous slope from the roof to the base of the decklid. Fastbacks can be two-door coupés or two- or four-door sedans.

Unlike the hatchback, a fastback car has a fixed rear window and typically a trunk that is separated by a bulkhead from the passenger cabin.
Click to expand...

http://www.answers.com/topic/fastback

Either way, I want a longer roof line and rear quarter hips.
 

red05bullitgt

Member
Aug 15, 2005
861
0
16
Pittsburgh, PA.
Sep 26, 2007
#37
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #37
Let's get something straight once and for all ! First off, I'm fully aware of what a full fastback is, and what it looks like, and second.. I don't need to look at some quote you posted from a friggin dictionary either..As I stated quite clearly in my intial post, the 67-73 Mustang became a FULL FASTBACK when Ford added the SPORTSROOF thus extending the roofline all the way back to the rear of the car...I also clearly stated that nothing would please me more, than to see a full fastback on the S-197 Mustang as well..However unless Ford either raises the height of the roofline, or extends the overall length of the trunk/rear section ? both the rear glass and trunk would have the apperance of looking way too high and flat, in which the car would then look very similar to the 71-73 Mustang, which I refer to as the FLATBACK..As for the current S-197 is concerned I'll agree that it isn't a full fastback, and I never claimed that it was, but according to Ford it's never the less considered as a fastback, just as the original 1965-66 2+2 fastback was..Therefore the current S-197 is indeed a fastback, and not a NOTCHBACK. And YES ! I also want a longer roofline too, but at least Ford will give us rear quarter hips, when the 2010 Mustang arrives in mid 09..
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Sep 27, 2007
#38
  • Sep 27, 2007
  • #38
Wow. Strike a nerve? Settle down man. I just would like to see a full fastback. What we have now is not a fastback in my opinion, and most others. It's a coupe to me.
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Sep 27, 2007
#39
  • Sep 27, 2007
  • #39
Our cars are like this now(minus hips).


What you are wanting is this.



They are both "fastbacks", just different styling end results.
 
S

stanmckinney

10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,188
5
49
Sep 27, 2007
#40
  • Sep 27, 2007
  • #40
I'll take a 1965 or 1966 fastback any day of the week.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
New to Mustangs/Fords
  • Joradan93Foxbody
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
140
The Welcome Wagon Mar 2, 2026
Joradan93Foxbody
J
T
Service Fluid Recommendations for 2015 Paxton Supercharged GT
  • ThotTrap
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
138
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 25, 2025
ThotTrap
T
1
Electrical 1985 mustang gt Led conversion trouble
  • 1985fox
  • Jan 5, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
639
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 15, 2026
1985fox
1
L
2005 gt mustang overheating sensor/failsafe mode
  • lyndenbouw
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
255
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 12, 2025
Noobz347
R
New mustang
  • Roach88
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
205
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2025
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?