• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Check out this stang for sale down the road from me. DUW!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter poneypower89
  • Start date Start date May 20, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

mondos90lx

Member
Nov 18, 2004
243
0
16
Stoneham Massachusetts
May 21, 2006
#21
  • May 21, 2006
  • #21
i think thats the ugliest year mustang ever
 

poneypower89

Now everyone in the world will know I wanna bang t
Dec 6, 2004
0
3
28
Indianapolis, Indiana
May 21, 2006
#22
  • May 21, 2006
  • #22
mondos90lx said:
i think thats the ugliest year mustang ever
Click to expand...

uglier than this????

View attachment 468109

ur blind if u think so
 

C.Harris

Da Boss
Founding Member
Dec 20, 1998
1,850
0
0
May 21, 2006
#23
  • May 21, 2006
  • #23
I love the 71-73 stangs (here's a few pics)...they can be downright mean and fast with the right equipment and when done right, (the '71 Boss 351 was the quickest Boss of the bunch BTW and the last year the 429 big blocks were offered in a production Mustang) Their looks were deceiving, the cars were only slightly larger than their predecessor and weight was much dependent on the options of the car. My '71 weighs 3200 lbs with built small block, big and littles, ram air hood, 1/4 tank of gas and no weigh reduction except AC and rear seat delete.




 

Attachments

  • 429.webp
    56.9 KB · Views: 288
  • bronze1-1.webp
    40.9 KB · Views: 277
I

iwashmycar

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 7, 2004
1,236
1
39
Columbus, Ohio
May 21, 2006
#24
  • May 21, 2006
  • #24
mondos90lx said:
i think thats the ugliest year mustang ever
Click to expand...
 

Aaron

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 5, 2003
95
40
38
Buffalo, NY
May 21, 2006
#25
  • May 21, 2006
  • #25
They aren't the UGLIEST, but I really don't like the HUGE rear on them!
Now a 69 Mach 1 is absolutely beautiful!
View attachment 468098
View attachment 468101
 

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
May 21, 2006
#26
  • May 21, 2006
  • #26
C.Harris said:
(the '71 Boss 351 was the quickest Boss of the bunch BTW
Click to expand...

I beg to differ.. the 71' was proven to be extremely fast but they had a street test and took OEM bosses that had been stored and the 70' 429 boss took the cake.. also it finished 1st in the muscle car shootout to see what was the baddest car of the time.. it spanked "the judge", GTOs, LS1 chevelles (not the new modular type motor but the 454s), and 396 camaros.. as well as all the hemis.. of course im going off of what speed TV and many of the other popular car shows have tested and proven..
 

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
May 21, 2006
#27
  • May 21, 2006
  • #27
beautiful car. if i had money for one, i'd buy it
 
S

speedytang

Founding Member
Jul 28, 1999
765
1
17
Marengo,Ohio,US
May 22, 2006
#28
  • May 22, 2006
  • #28
Poster: Could you get me a phone number so I can call the owner.
Thank You
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
May 22, 2006
#29
  • May 22, 2006
  • #29
It could be a 71, most 71s had a chrome front bumper but you could also get them with the rubber one that was on all 72s and 73s. 73s had vertical front turn signals instead of the horizontal ones like whats on the 71s and 72s. You could option any 71-73 mustang however you wanted it. You could get a mach 1 without scoops, you could get a ghia with scoops and a Q-code 351. The best way to distinguish whether or not its a mach 1 other than looking at the vin that I know of is to look at the interior, mach 1s got the delux interior, which consisited of different door pannels, seats, and 3 gauges in the center of the dash above the radio.
 

C.Harris

Da Boss
Founding Member
Dec 20, 1998
1,850
0
0
May 22, 2006
#30
  • May 22, 2006
  • #30
Ironman92GT said:
I beg to differ.. the 71' was proven to be extremely fast but they had a street test and took OEM bosses that had been stored and the 70' 429 boss took the cake.. also it finished 1st in the muscle car shootout to see what was the baddest car of the time.. it spanked "the judge", GTOs, LS1 chevelles (not the new modular type motor but the 454s), and 396 camaros.. as well as all the hemis.. of course im going off of what speed TV and many of the other popular car shows have tested and proven..
Click to expand...

I do know of the musclecar shootout TV show you are referring to on Speed and the Boss 429 did win (glad it did too) but there was no Boss 351 Mustang in that lineup.

Course we all know the Boss 429 had huge potential to tap into as it was less than optomized in stock form with a small 735 cfm carb, mediocre cam profile and restrictive exhaust. I've seen plenty of literature showing better 1/4 mile times for the Boss 351s over the Boss 429 and 302s and be more comparable with the '68 1/2 428 CJs.

Mustangs & Fords awarded the Boss 351 "Best Boss Engine" & "Fastest Factory Boss" http://www.mustangandfords.com/thehistoryof/173_0402_boss_35_years/index4.html
(from what I read seems that while the Boss 429 was right there with the 351 in performance, they determined that the Boss 351 ran in the high 13s in stock form more consistently in almost every magazine test performed) - so seems depending on who was doing the testing at the time, e.t.s varied, so we'll call it a toss up

Mustang Monthly: "The amazing thing about the '71 Boss 351 road tests is the middle-b-powered fastback ran as quick as the earlier 428 Cobra Jet Mustangs."

Quick cars, both of em!
 

woodyy24

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
290
0
0
illinois
May 22, 2006
#31
  • May 22, 2006
  • #31
whys your name not on the title yet?
 
M

myshifter

Banned
May 18, 2006
13
0
0
May 22, 2006
#32
  • May 22, 2006
  • #32
Ahh good ole cleveland memories. I got enough cleveland parts in my garage to build 20 of those motors. Buy it already
 

pistonhead351

flim hunter
May 1, 2005
75
0
0
May 22, 2006
#33
  • May 22, 2006
  • #33
ill post some pics of my dads 71 boss when i get home
 

poneypower89

Now everyone in the world will know I wanna bang t
Dec 6, 2004
0
3
28
Indianapolis, Indiana
May 22, 2006
#34
  • May 22, 2006
  • #34
speedytang said:
Poster: Could you get me a phone number so I can call the owner.
Thank You
Click to expand...


SPEEDYSTANG: The for sale sign did not state the phone number or the price for the car. HOWEVER, I am 100% sure the owner is working at the building behind the parked car. It woulnt take me but 15 minutes to find out all the info once I was there. So, if you are serious, shoot me a pm and I will get the info for you. Hell, I kinda wanna know myself to just to know. So either way, just say something.
 

Look Its Aaron

Your car looks like it came straight from Mexico.
Founding Member
Nov 18, 2001
2,634
0
48
Fontana, Cali
May 22, 2006
#35
  • May 22, 2006
  • #35
Looks Uglier than crap.

Ford effed up with mustangs from 71-84
 
R

rigamaroles

New Member
Jun 27, 2005
0
0
0
British Columbia
May 22, 2006
#36
  • May 22, 2006
  • #36
64.5 - 70, 85-93, 99-06, those are the good years. Not a fan of the early sn's either, I think its fugly.
 

Aaron

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 5, 2003
95
40
38
Buffalo, NY
May 22, 2006
#37
  • May 22, 2006
  • #37
rigamaroles said:
64.5 - 70, 85-93, 99-06, those are the good years. Not a fan of the early sn's either, I think its fugly.
Click to expand...

I agree to a point...here's my version

64.5-70, 79-06.
 

QUICK91LX

Founding Member
Dec 7, 2001
968
3
39
New Jersey
May 23, 2006
#38
  • May 23, 2006
  • #38
i love all mustangs...some more than others...but i even like the II's...the II's did have their place in mustang history, helped our favorite ponycar limp through the rough gas starved seventies...i love foxes the best and all the rest kinda fall even with each other...the II's do bring up the rear though...i like all different ones more or less based on options and modifications as well...
 
R

Reed

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
78
0
0
BC, Canada
May 23, 2006
#39
  • May 23, 2006
  • #39
Agreed. The '69 Mach 1s and Bosses are my favourite Mustangs along with the '69 Shelbys.

aaron11272 said:
They aren't the UGLIEST, but I really don't like the HUGE rear on them!
Now a 69 Mach 1 is absolutely beautiful!
View attachment 467693
View attachment 467696
Click to expand...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Project 2nd Chance Pony - Status Update
  • JKWilson61
  • Dec 14, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2020
JKWilson61
M
I really wasn't expecting this....... First time Mustang owner.......
  • Mikedd969
  • Nov 27, 2019
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
3K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Nov 28, 2019
Mikedd969
M
Daily Driver Decisions....Need Honest Help
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
58
Views
11K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2020
BlakeusMaximus
Brakes 1979-1986 Fox Parking Brake Adjustment
  • LiquidStangs
  • Sep 22, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
9K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 23, 2019
LX Dave
Getting my car decent. Looking for thoughts on this long list.
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jun 10, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
50
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2020
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?