• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Chevy Engine In A Foxbody

  • Thread starter Thread starter sspnotcback
  • Start date Start date Nov 27, 2013
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

sspnotcback

Member
Jan 5, 2013
54
3
9
Nov 27, 2013
#1
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #1
ok so im sure many of you guys have seen chevy engines in foxbodies before.and im sure yall have noticed how they act like the ls engines are far superior to a ford engine. well the truth is they are definetly not.i think the chevy guys just really like the fox platform because its a kick ass little car that is great for all kinds of racing.how come you dont see alot of ls swaps into 3rd gen camaros.because they are junk thats why.plain and simple.point is it dosent bother me that thay do these swaps.just admit that they wish chevy would have made a cool car like the foxbody for them too. ha ha..........
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Nov 27, 2013
#2
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #2
What?

Anyone that tries to deny the capability of the Chevy LS motors is just wrong and/or brand blind. I have no problem with it at all, I think its great and it is what hot-rodding is all about.
 
Reactions: tannerc91gt, TOOLOW91, hoopty5.0 and 1 other person

elarm1

10 Year Member
Dec 17, 2010
1,428
652
154
N.Va
Nov 27, 2013
#3
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #3
An LS motor is BAD A$$! Cheap, plentiful, good on power. Whats not to like? I tell all my friends with chebbies, convert to LS or continue to eat dust!
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,289
1,632
214
Acworth, GA
Nov 27, 2013
#4
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #4
I don't look at it like the Ford body needed a Chevy engine to go fast. I look at it in the perspective that the Chevy engine needs a Ford body to go fast.

Kurt
 
Reactions: NTO_GUY, Gearbanger 101, Bullitt347 and 1 other person

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,947
2,902
194
Middle of Maine
Nov 27, 2013
#5
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #5
The LS is a good engine, the Fox platform is superior for drag racing compared to the Camaro/Firebird, especially in "stock" suspension classes. That is why you see Chevy guys swapping into the Fox body cars. Nevermind the Fox platform is generally lighter weight and the aftermarket is HUGE for those cars.
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,767
6,932
214
SW Houston
Nov 27, 2013
#6
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #6
Wtf? Dude you are way off. And yes, people do lots of 3rd gen swaps. You sound like a second grader professing that your dad can beat up anyone else's.

I'm doing an LS swap because it's cheap. For $1200 I was able to buy and lightly modify a 6.0 to handle 4 digit horsepower with a turbo.

If I could have done it with a 302, I would have. End of story.
 
Reactions: A5literMan and 85rkyboby
S

sspnotcback

Member
Jan 5, 2013
54
3
9
Nov 27, 2013
#7
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #7
revhead347 said:
I don't look at it like the Ford body needed a Chevy engine to go fast. I look at it in the perspective that the Chevy engine needs a Ford body to go fast.

Kurt
Click to expand...
this is really the point i was trying to make here guys.
 
S

sspnotcback

Member
Jan 5, 2013
54
3
9
Nov 27, 2013
#8
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #8
dont get me wrong i think the ls engines are pretty good but are they really better than a 347 or 351w set-up i dont think so.
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,767
6,932
214
SW Houston
Nov 27, 2013
#9
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #9
sspnotcback said:
dont get me wrong i think the ls engines are pretty good but are they really better than a 347 or 351w set-up i dont think so.
Click to expand...

Careful, thinking and knowing are very different.

For instance, I know that arguing this point is moot on a ford forum, but I think if you read up on LS engines you may change your opinion.
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,481
8,677
234
S.I.NY
Nov 27, 2013
#10
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #10
GroverDill said:
What?

Anyone that tries to deny the capability of the Chevy LS motors is just wrong and/or brand blind. I have no problem with it at all, I think its great and it is what hot-rodding is all about.
Click to expand...
Ditto end of story , people sometimes forget how hot rodding evolved
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,767
6,932
214
SW Houston
Nov 27, 2013
#11
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #11
And I don't want anyone to think I'm a Chevy purist, quite the opposite actually.

But like I said, if I could have got the 5.0 to do my dirty work, I would have used it.
 

85rkyboby

Active Member
Mar 2, 2011
923
96
39
South ATL
Nov 27, 2013
#12
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #12
sspnotcback said:
dont get me wrong i think the ls engines are pretty good but are they really better than a 347 or 351w set-up i dont think so.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure you would have to have a Dart 351 to compare to a LS, by standing of HP limitations. 302 block would be a paperweight.
 
S

sspnotcback

Member
Jan 5, 2013
54
3
9
Nov 27, 2013
#13
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #13
but yall know what im saying right.some but not all of these chevy guys act like ford motors cant keep up.and that is a bunch of bull.........
 
S

sspnotcback

Member
Jan 5, 2013
54
3
9
Nov 27, 2013
#14
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #14
hoopty5.0 said:
And I don't want anyone to think I'm a Chevy purist, quite the opposite actually.

But like I said, if I could have got the 5.0 to do my dirty work, I would have used it.
Click to expand...
you can get the 5.0 to do your dirty work.the ford racing block or the new coyote.but i know not for $1200 as for me i would spend a little extra to keep it all ford
 

85rkyboby

Active Member
Mar 2, 2011
923
96
39
South ATL
Nov 27, 2013
#15
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #15
$1200 is a steal. A dart shortblock 393 runs at least $5k
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Nov 27, 2013
#16
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #16
Dart based shortblock with cam,etc is 5k. OP there is no comparison between a factory block ford vs Chevy in a max power build. I have never been brand "loyal" I've owned Chevys,fords,even a dodge.
 
Reactions: 85rkyboby

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,179
17,884
224
Massachusetts
Nov 27, 2013
#17
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #17
LS motors can be had dirt cheap out of many GM products.


When I can go to a boneyard and grab a terminator 4.6 or a coyote 5.0 easily and for dirt cheap.....then I'll be happy.
 
Reactions: A5literMan and hoopty5.0

90lxwhite

I'm kind of a She-Man
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2011
3,310
374
134
Between the Red and Rio
Nov 27, 2013
#18
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #18
Yeah hp per $ Chevy wins.
 
K

keaton5.0

Member
Aug 22, 2013
43
8
19
Nov 27, 2013
#19
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #19
I'm a very brand loyal person and a die hard ford guy. But I'm also realistic and honest and the LS motors are very impressive. I'll never own one due to my stubbornness but they are definitely great engines.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Nov 27, 2013
#20
  • Nov 27, 2013
  • #20
sspnotcback said:
you can get the 5.0 to do your dirty work.the ford racing block or the new coyote.but i know not for $1200 as for me i would spend a little extra to keep it all ford
Click to expand...

No, you would spend ALOT extra to keep it all ford. A Coyote is a 7000.00 dollar engine before you have to add the 1500.00 controller to make it work, and as new as it is, you can forget getting one out of the salvage yard.
The Ford racing block? What?... the Sportsman block alone costs as much as the
LS JY engine examples that are all over the internet making, and living at twice the "stock block split" maximum a little 302 has proven capable of.

Turning your nose up at the potential of a LS engine is tantamount to sticking your head in the sand.

Yes, it is common to see a Chevy guy stuff his engine in a fox body. It doesn't take a degree in race chassis dynamics to understand the reasons,... It just means that most of them know how to add,.... and subtract..
 
Reactions: 85rkyboby
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

My 93 4v Fox
  • OffspringChaos
  • Aug 30, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2024
bird_dog0347
L
Engine 97 mustang gt manual weird idol when off the throttle and coasting in 3rd, 4th, or 5th
  • Lanezs
  • Jun 9, 2023
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2023
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
G
Progress Thread My new 5.0 engine bay progress
  • Guccijayda
  • May 19, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2019
deathb4dismount
J
Engine foxbody Ls swal
  • jakew315
  • Nov 11, 2018
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
2
Views
4K
Fox Engine Swaparoo Nov 12, 2018
tannerc91gt
So,...You're gonna take your car to a shop to have it worked on...lets talk.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Mar 3, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 3, 2019
Rdub6
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?