• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Chevy engine in a Stang?!?!

  • Thread starter Thread starter 69-B2
  • Start date Start date Jan 4, 2009
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Next
First Prev 5 of 7 Next Last

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 8, 2009
#81
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #81
Good to see this thread is still alive and kicking, at 4 pages no less! Nothing like a good flame fest.


Rick James said:
Wouldnt it have been easier to just start with a mustang?
Click to expand...

Wait wait wait... For an LSx motor, wouldn't it just be easier to start with a Camaro or Firebird?!!?? At this point, you can't give gearbanger a hard time for building up an engine that is SUPPOSED to be in the car.
 
R

Rick James

Member
May 13, 2007
172
3
19
burlington new jersey
Jan 8, 2009
#82
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #82
Its not a flame contest,and i am not giving gearbanger a hard time.we are allowed to have an opinion.Even you are allowed to have one.If somebody wants to put a chevy engine in there car(A BAD Ass one),more power to them.If someone wants to puta built engine in a cougar more power to them to.Any way you seem to not have anything better to do and want to see a peeing contest and you can have one......................................... without me.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 8, 2009
#83
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #83
Yea, I know, everybody is entitled to their own opinion. But don't expect to come on a Mustang website and support the idea of putting a Chevy power plant in a Ford and not get any retaliation. Its just a concept I'll fight against for the rest of my life. I still want to be friends. Haha.
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,392
3,539
233
Jan 8, 2009
#84
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #84
So this thread is growing nicely with absolutly no help from the OP.
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Jan 8, 2009
#85
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #85
25thmustang said:
Glad my junks stock, and not something others don't approve of.

Then I might really be a loser in the Mustang community.

Click to expand...

No ****. People bow to my car when they see it cause it's all stock Ford parts. Thank god they can't tell it has a non-Ford made exhaust and shifter! I would be hung right from the Burger King sign! I mean uh, just kidding... haha... they're Ford Motorsport mufflers. Please spare me Mustang Gods of Stangnet. I didn't install the Flows I swear.
 

DocG

5th graders > me. They're not bant
Sep 25, 2005
8,297
1,358
194
Cincinnati area
Jan 8, 2009
#86
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #86
You guys are funny. I love cars.

That's all there is to it. If its done well and done right, I'll probably like it. I don't care what brand it is.

But like I said...I love cars, not just Mustangs like some of ya.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Jan 8, 2009
#87
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #87
blackened88lx said:
No ****. People bow to my car when they see it cause it's all stock Ford parts. Thank god they can't tell it has a non-Ford made exhaust and shifter! I would be hung right from the Burger King sign! I mean uh, just kidding... haha... they're Ford Motorsport mufflers. Please spare me Mustang Gods of Stangnet. I didn't install the Flows I swear.
Click to expand...



This is what i dont understand about some fox mustang "enthusiasts"

the aftermarket is what made these cars so popular and without aftermarket support the car wouldnt be 10% of what it is now. If i wanted to see a stock original car with the correct tag on the radiator cap and original air still in the tires i'd go to a MOPAR SHOW... thats right, i just compared us to mopar guys, and i dont like it one bit, those guys are ****ing wacko... Modify your fox mustang till your in the 9's thats what these cars are made for
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Jan 8, 2009
#88
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #88
90lxcoupe said:
This is what i dont understand about some fox mustang "enthusiasts"

the aftermarket is what made these cars so popular and without aftermarket support the car wouldnt be 10% of what it is now. If i wanted to see a stock original car with the correct tag on the radiator cap and original air still in the tires i'd go to a MOPAR SHOW... thats right, i just compared us to mopar guys, and i dont like it one bit, those guys are ****ing wacko... Modify your fox mustang till your in the 9's thats what these cars are made for
Click to expand...

I agree 100%, my post was pure sarcasm if you didn't notice. I just don't see why it matters who makes the parts that you use to get to 9s.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 8, 2009
#89
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #89
Rick James said:
Wouldnt it have been easier to just start with a mustang?
Click to expand...

Had one.....had three of them actually and wanted something different. I got tired of the creeks and rattles, the crappy ride and every teenager in a minivan, Civic, or a Sunfire wanting to run me at the light. Also, at 6'3" another Fox wasn't going to cut it.

SN95's were still far too pricey for my liking when I got rid of my last fox and I got this car for a steal ($800 with a bad engine).

Now, it outruns anything from the factory short of an '03-'04 Cobra, or a GT500, out handles and out stops a Fox and rides better than any of them. And I've actually got a trunk with this car. Not to mention it still knocks down about 26mpg on the highway.

The plan was to keep this car a few years while the SN95's came down in price, then transplant the drive train later on. If you think about it....I saved a bunch of money. Now instead of having to be without power for X-number of years while I scrape the finances together for the SN95, I still get to have a nice, comfortable, fast car that when I'm done with will allow me to swap the parts over and not have to build a second time with another Mustang.

Look, I understand the point you are trying to make, but in no way, shape or form does me building my Cougar, that already had and was set up with an existing Ford modular based platform compare to going through the trouble of scraping up the parts to put a Chevy engine in a Mustang and creating some bastardized version of a hot rod when there are plenty of offerings, right from Ford that would make just as much power, would be easier to install and wouldn't get disapproving looks from Ford loyalists like myself.

So.....have you any more straws you would like to grasp at, or have I answered all of your questions to your liking?
 
R

Rick James

Member
May 13, 2007
172
3
19
burlington new jersey
Jan 8, 2009
#90
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #90
Gearbanger.........I think you have everything covered,i dont think i have anymore straws to grasp
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,392
3,539
233
Jan 8, 2009
#91
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #91
*passes through on way to other thread*
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 8, 2009
#92
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #92
LaserSVT said:
*passes through on way to other thread*
Click to expand...

Haha, you like it, dontcha Laser? :stirpot:
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 8, 2009
#93
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #93
Rick James said:
Gearbanger.........I think you have everything covered,i dont think i have anymore straws to grasp
Click to expand...

Sorry man, I don’t mean to sound pessimistic or catty here, but it just seemed like you were overly determined to use my car as the example to justify the Mustang/LS1 merger, but the fact remains that the examples and their circumstances were and are completely different.
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,392
3,539
233
Jan 8, 2009
#94
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #94
NikwoaC said:
Haha, you like it, dontcha Laser? :stirpot:
Click to expand...
Theres just nothing to do here at work
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 8, 2009
#95
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #95
LaserSVT said:
Theres just nothing to do here at work
Click to expand...

I feel ya. That's why I spend waaaaaay too much time on StangNet between 8am and 430pm.

At least it gives me something to stay awake about so the boss doesn't sneak up on me sleeping.
 

LaserSVT

Got FB banned again for saying nards
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
9,392
3,539
233
Jan 8, 2009
#96
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #96
 

248a

New Member
Feb 9, 2008
0
0
0
Phoenix, AZ
Jan 8, 2009
#97
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #97
NikwoaC said:
Wait wait wait... For an LSx motor, wouldn't it just be easier to start with a Camaro or Firebird?!!??
Click to expand...

I don't know if you've ever seen under the hood of a 4th gen camaro but it's like working in a van. It makes me laugh when people complain about putting LTs in the Fox4 platform... those fourth gens are nasty to work on, half the engine in under the cowl and the LT1 models are massive torque-making rolling piles of chit.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jan 8, 2009
#98
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #98
248a said:
I don't know if you've ever seen under the hood of a 4th gen camaro but it's like working in a van. It makes me laugh when people complain about putting LTs in the Fox4 platform... those fourth gens are nasty to work on, half the engine in under the cowl and the LT1 models are massive torque-making rolling piles of chit.
Click to expand...

Had a few buddies in college with F-Bodies, and yea, who knows what GM was thinking when they engineered that engine placement. The engine is installed/removed from under the car, right?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 8, 2009
#99
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #99
NikwoaC said:
Had a few buddies in college with F-Bodies, and yea, who knows what GM was thinking when they engineered that engine placement. The engine is installed/removed from under the car, right?
Click to expand...

I can only imagine the initial thought was to bring the engine as far back towards the cowl and away from the front end as possible to keep the weight distribution more even.

Based on the way I've seen most of them handle though, it still didn't do a whole lot of good?

I'd rather swap LT headers in a fox than change spark plugs in an early F-Body.
 

Strype

Cuthbert catcher
Founding Member
May 11, 1999
61
34
104
Huntsvegas, AL
Jan 8, 2009
#100
  • Jan 8, 2009
  • #100
I'm glad the troll started this thread. Now we know who to laugh at and talk about for the next couple of days.

Then I say we start the Oreo Cookie debate again.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Next
First Prev 5 of 7 Next Last
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

P
rear Impact absorbers.
  • Praetorious
  • May 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
160
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2026
Praetorious
P
H
Drivetrain 6R80 to t56 swap
  • Holymoses
  • Apr 25, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
312
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
  • Sticky
Free Beta Access: Tool I Built to Hunt Fox Bodies Faster
  • MRaburn
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
538
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 7, 2026
FastDriver
G
Fox Tire Size for 16" Pony Wheels on 1984 LX Convertible
  • gw7
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
127
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
87
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
SophiaTatum
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?